agentleFS
Sign inStart free
yvesoryyvesory/academic-research-suite/skills/research-review/SKILL.md

research-review

Skill9 starsChanged 3 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Get a deep critical review of research from an external reviewer backend (Codex or manual). Use when user says "review my research", "help me review", "get external review", or wants critical feedback on research ideas, papers, or experimental results.

18 other projects use a version of this, 11 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use experiment-bridge, experiment-audit and 4 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • raja21068Skill

    experiment-bridge

    Workflow 1.5: Bridge between idea discovery and auto review. Reads EXPERIMENT_PLAN.md, implements experiment code, deploys to GPU, collects initial results. Use when user says \"实现实验\", \"implement experiments\", \"bridge\", \"从计划到跑实验\", \"deploy the plan\", or has an experiment plan ready to execute.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • PostHogSkill

    experiment-audit

    Audit a PostHog A/B experiment for a customer — verify config, exposure, attribution, and metrics. Trigger phrases include \"audit [customer]'s experiment\", \"audit the [name] experiment\", \"check experiment setup for [customer]\", \"validate this A/B test\", or any request to review whether an experiment is correctly wired up. Assumes you already have MCP access to the customer's project (typically via the impersonation flow set up by the `impersonate-audit` wrapper that ships with this plugin).

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • raja21068Skill

    proof-checker

    Rigorous mathematical proof verification and fixing workflow. Reads a LaTeX proof, identifies gaps via cross-model review (Codex GPT-5.4 xhigh), fixes each gap with full derivations, re-reviews, and generates an audit report. Use when user says "检查证明", "verify proof", "proof check", "审证明", "check this proof", or wants rigorous mathematical verification of a theory paper.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • rongaredeSkill

    semantic-scholar

    使用 Semantic Scholar API 检索和验证学术论文。支持并发多关键词搜索、批量 ID/DOI 查询、引用分析、批量补全摘要、统一 Markdown 导出。覆盖 2.14 亿+ 学术论文，无需 API Key 即可使用。触发词：论文检索、论文验证、Semantic Scholar、S2 搜索、查论文、补全摘要、导出MD

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +2 more from raja21068

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 4 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 8 are very specific to this project.

  • 4

    Common

    Most of the 16 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 8

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 16 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free