matlab-review-code
Skill8 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Review MATLAB code for quality, performance, maintainability, and adherence to MathWorks coding standards. Uses check_matlab_code and matlab_coding_guidelines. Use when reviewing code, checking style, finding code smells, assessing quality, or preparing code for handoff or publication.
In this repository58 other files it gives its agents.
- skills/writing-polish/humanizer/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- frontend-designSkill
- ask-mattSkill
- codebase-designSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- diagnosing-bugsSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- github-codex-keySkill
- github-ssh-key-pushSkill
- implementSkill
- improve-codebase-architectureSkill
- prototypeSkill
- setup-matt-pocock-skillsSkill
- tddSkill
- to-issuesSkill
- to-prdSkill
- triageSkill
- huggingface-accelerateSkill
- quantizing-models-bitsandbytesSkill
- gpuboxSkill
- evaluating-llms-harnessSkill
- ml-training-recipesSkill
- peft-fine-tuningSkill
- experiment-tracking-swanlabSkill
- unslothSkill
- matlab-add-awgnSkill
- matlab-agentic-toolkit-setupSkill
- matlab-build-appSkill
- matlab-create-live-scriptSkill
- matlab-debuggingSkill
- matlab-design-digital-filterSkill
- matlab-display-imageSkill
- matlab-install-productsSkill
- matlab-list-productsSkill
- matlab-map-database-objectsSkill
- matlab-model-serdes-systemsSkill
- matlab-modernize-codeSkill
- matlab-read-databaseSkill
- matlab-testingSkill
- matlab-use-duckdbSkill
- matlab-write-databaseSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- grill-with-docsSkill
- handoffSkill
- teachSkill
- writing-great-skillsSkill
- ara-compilerSkill
- ara-research-managerSkill
- research-paper-notesSkill
- ara-rigor-reviewerSkill
- brainstorming-research-ideasSkill
- creative-thinking-for-researchSkill
- academic-plottingSkill
- ml-paper-writingSkill
- paper-spineSkill
- humanizerSkill
- prompt-optimizerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 19
After a significant implementation — verify before committing
- Very specific: line 40
Use the check_matlab_code MCP tool on each file.
- Very specific: line 59
Read the matlab_coding_guidelines MCP resource to get the authoritative MathWorks coding standards.
- Very specific: line 104
Use of eval, assignin, or evalin — security and maintainability risk
- Distinctive: line 121
Do not skip Steps 3-6 of the workflow just because checkcode returns few results.
- Very specific: line 186
Always run check_matlab_code as the first step — it catches issues automatically
- Very specific: line 190
Check requiredFilesAndProducts to verify toolbox dependencies are documented
- Distinctive: line 191
Verify every public function has an H1 help text line
- Very specific: line 192
Use codeIssues for directory-wide analysis (R2022b+)
- Distinctive: line 193
Do not suggest changes that alter behavior — review is read-only assessment
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Code Review
Systematically review MATLAB code for quality, correctness, performance, and adherence to MathWorks coding conventions using static analysis and manual inspection patterns.
When to Use
- User asks to review, audit, or improve code quality
- User wants to check adherence to MathWorks coding standards
- Preparing code for handoff, publication, or open-source release
- After a significant implementation — verify before committing
- User reports "code smells" or asks for cleanup suggestions
When NOT to Use
- User wants to debug a runtime error — use
matlab-debugginginstead - User wants to optimize performance — use performance profiling skills
- User wants to generate tests — use
matlab-testinginstead
Workflow
- Run static analysis — Use
check_matlab_codeMCP tool on all target files - Load coding standards — Read the
matlab_coding_guidelinesMCP resource - Check naming — Verify functions, classes, variables, and files follow conventions
- Review function signatures — Arguments blocks, input/output counts, name-value patterns
- Assess structure — Function length, nesting depth, complexity
- Check patterns — Vectorization, preallocation, modern API usage
- Summarize — Report findings by severity: errors > warnings > suggestions
Step 1: Static Analysis
Use the check_matlab_code MCP tool on each file. Then inspect results programmatically:
info = checkcode("src/computeArea.m", "-struct");
for k = 1:numel(info)
fprintf('Line %d (col %d-%d): %s\n', ...
info(k).line, info(k).column(1), info(k).column(end), info(k).message);
endFor directory-wide analysis (R2022b+):
issues = codeIssues("src");
disp(issues.Issues);Step 2: Load Coding Standards
Read the matlab_coding_guidelines MCP resource to get the authoritative MathWorks coding standards. Use these as the baseline for all naming, formatting, and structural checks.
Review Checklist
Naming
| Element | Convention | Example |
| Functions | lowerCamelCase, verb phrase | computeArea, loadData |
| Classes | PascalCase | SensorReader, DataProcessor |
| Variables | lowerCamelCase, descriptive | sampleRate not sr |
| Constants | UPPER_SNAKE or Constant property | MAX_ITERATIONS |
| Test files | t prefix | tComputeArea.m |
| App files | PascalCase | DashboardApp.m |
| File = function | File name matches primary function | computeArea.m → function computeArea |
Function Quality
| Check | Standard | Severity |
| Input count | Max 6 positional inputs | Warning |
| Output count | Max 4 outputs | Warning |
| Validation | arguments block present | Warning |
| Name-value args | options.Name pattern (not varargin) | Suggestion |
| Length | Flag if >50 lines | Suggestion |
| Nesting | Flag if >3 levels deep | Warning |
end keyword | All functions terminated with end | Warning |
| Help text | H1 line present for public functions | Suggestion |
Code Patterns
| Check | Modern | Legacy (flag it) |
| Multi-panel figures | tiledlayout/nexttile | subplot |
| Date/time | datetime | datenum/datestr |
| Strings | string type | char arrays for text |
| Vectorization | .*, ./, logical indexing | Loops over elements |
| Preallocation | zeros(n,1) before loop | Growing arrays in loops |
| Data containers | table/timetable | Raw matrices for named data |
| Dynamic eval | Direct function calls | eval, evalin, assignin |
High-Severity Flags
These should always be reported as errors:
- Use of
eval,assignin, orevalin— security and maintainability risk - Growing arrays inside loops without preallocation — performance
- Shadowing built-in functions —
sum = 5shadowssum() - Missing
argumentsblock in public-facing functions - Hardcoded file paths with backslashes
What checkcode Misses
check_matlab_code does NOT catch all issues. After running static analysis, always scan the source code for these common problems that require visual inspection:
subplotusage — not flagged by checkcode, but should usetiledlayout/nexttile- Shadowed builtin variables —
sum = 0shadowssum(), checkcode may not flag it - Deep nesting (>3 levels) — checkcode does not measure nesting depth
- Hardcoded backslash paths — checkcode flags unused variables but not path style
- Magic numbers — unlabeled constants in code (e.g.,
if length(x) > 10) - Missing H1 help text — checkcode does not require help text
Do not skip Steps 3-6 of the workflow just because checkcode returns few results.
Patterns
Complexity Assessment
function complexity = assessComplexity(filePath)
%assessComplexity Estimate cyclomatic complexity of a MATLAB function.
arguments
filePath (1,1) string {mustBeFile}
end
code = fileread(filePath);
branchKeywords = ["if " "elseif " "case " "while " "for " "catch "];
complexity = 1;
for kw = branchKeywords
complexity = complexity + numel(strfind(code, kw));
end
endCheck Toolbox Dependencies
[files, products] = matlab.codetools.requiredFilesAndProducts('src/myFunction.m');
fprintf('Required products:\n');
for k = 1:numel(products)
fprintf(' %s (ID: %d)\n', products(k).Name, products(k).ProductNumber);
endReview Report Format
Present findings in this format:
## Code Review: computeArea.m
### Static Analysis (checkcode)
- 2 warnings, 0 errors
### Naming ✓
- [x] Function: lowerCamelCase
- [x] Variables: descriptive
- [x] File name matches function
### Structure
- [x] arguments block present
- [x] Function under 50 lines
- [ ] ⚠ Nesting depth reaches 4 levels (line 32)
### Patterns
- [x] Vectorized
- [x] Modern graphics API
- [ ] ⚠ Uses datenum (line 18) — migrate to datetime
### Suggestions
1. Extract nested logic at line 32 into a local function
2. Replace datenum with datetime for date handlingConventions
- Always run
check_matlab_codeas the first step — it catches issues automatically - Load
matlab_coding_guidelinesfor the authoritative standard - Report findings by severity: errors (must fix) > warnings (should fix) > suggestions (nice to have)
- Flag any use of
eval,assignin, orevalinas high-severity - Check
requiredFilesAndProductsto verify toolbox dependencies are documented - Verify every public function has an H1 help text line
- Use
codeIssuesfor directory-wide analysis (R2022b+) - Do not suggest changes that alter behavior — review is read-only assessment
- For deprecated API migration details, use the
matlab-modernize-codeskill
Copyright 2026 The MathWorks, Inc.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

