agentleFS
yu-iskwyu-iskw/coding-agent-fabric/.claude/skills/test-and-fix/SKILL.md

test-and-fix

Skill1 starsChanged 9 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Run unit tests and automatically fix code failures, regression bugs, or test mismatches. Use when tests are failing, after implementing new features, or to repair "broken" tests.

5 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use techdebt and grill.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • dbankscardSkill

    techdebt

    Find and report technical debt, duplicated code, and cleanup opportunities. Run at end of sessions.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • renatorozasSkill

    grill

    Adversarial code review. Don't let me ship until the changes pass your scrutiny.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Identify: Run pnpm test to identify failing tests.

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    If passed: Move to the next failing test or finish if all are resolved.

    line 21
  3. Distinctive:

    If failed: Analyze the new failure (or the same one if the fix was insufficient) and repeat the loop.

    line 22
  4. Very specific:

    All tests pass (as reported by pnpm test).

    line 26

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Test and Fix Loop

Purpose

An autonomous loop for the agent to identify, analyze, and fix failing unit tests using Vitest.

Loop Logic

  1. Identify: Run pnpm test to identify failing tests.
  2. Analyze: Examine the test output to determine:
    • The failing test file and line number.
    • The expected vs actual values.
    • Refer to ../common-references/troubleshooting.md for common test failure patterns.
  3. Fix: Apply the minimum necessary change to either the source code (if it's a bug) or the test code (if the test is outdated).
  4. Verify: Re-run pnpm test.
    • If passed: Move to the next failing test or finish if all are resolved.
    • If failed: Analyze the new failure (or the same one if the fix was insufficient) and repeat the loop.

Termination Criteria

  • All tests pass (as reported by pnpm test).
  • Reached max iteration limit (default: 5).
  • The error persists after multiple distinct fix attempts, indicating a need for human intervention or a broader architectural change.

Examples

Scenario: Fixing a logic error

  1. pnpm test fails in packages/common/src/math.test.ts because add(2, 2) returned 5.
  2. Agent analyzes packages/common/src/math.ts and finds a typo a + b + 1.
  3. Agent fixes the typo to a + b.
  4. pnpm test passes.

Scenario: Updating a test after a deliberate change

  1. pnpm test fails because a UI component's text changed from "Submit" to "Confirm".
  2. Agent confirms the change was intentional.
  3. pnpm test passes.

Resources

  • pnpm Commands for Node.js: Common commands for testing and managing dependencies.
  • Testing Best Practices: Project-specific testing guidelines.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.