mcp-toolchain-manager
Skill7 starsChanged 21 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Detect frontend tool capabilities, report gaps, verify official setup sources, plan approval-gated MCP changes, or update project/mcp-profile.md. Prefer capabilities over provider names; never install or configure without approval.
In this repository23 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- agent-rules-skill-authorSkill
- agent-self-improvementSkill
- design-screenshot-specSkill
- execution-plan-managerSkill
- frontend-architecture-plannerSkill
- frontend-bugfix-debuggerSkill
- frontend-design-directorSkill
- frontend-design-intelligenceSkill
- frontend-layout-implementerSkill
- frontend-linter-managerSkill
- frontend-prototype-explorerSkill
- frontend-quality-reviewerSkill
- frontend-refactor-surgeonSkill
- frontend-visual-qaSkill
- goal-plannerSkill
- greenfield-project-builderSkill
- loop-workflow-plannerSkill
- pattern-library-managerSkill
- project-context-adapterSkill
- project-onboarding-adapterSkill
- webdev-feedbackSkill
- webdev-kit-updaterSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
37 rules. About 0 are common, 24 are distinctive, and 13 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈24
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
13
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 41
Use this skill when:
- Very specific: line 51
Use this skill in Standard Workflow or Deep Workflow when tool capability affects the current slice.
- Distinctive: line 57
Do not use this skill just because a task exists.
- Distinctive: line 59
Do not use this skill for:
- Distinctive: line 67
Do not install tools from this skill unless the user explicitly approved that installation in the current task context and the official …
- Distinctive: line 69
Do not use this skill to implement frontend code, write tests, scaffold projects, create UI library setups, or access production systems.
- Very specific: line 75
Read common/mcp-installation-policy.md when installation or configuration is in scope.
- Very specific: line 76
Read common/prompt-intent-routing-rules.md when workflow level is unclear.
- Very specific: line 77
Read tool-capabilities-manifest.json for selected skills and capabilities.
- Very specific: line 78
Read common/codex-official-docs-policy.md only when openai_platform_docs is active.
- Very specific: line 79
Read selected agents/openai.yaml files only when Codex UI or invocation metadata matters.
- Very specific: line 80
Read project/mcp-profile.md when it exists and the task needs durable tool state.
- Very specific: line 81
Read project/verification-profile.md only when verification commands influence tool needs.
- Distinctive: line 82
Do not read all skills or all YAML files during normal routing.
- Distinctive: line 90
Must prefer declared capabilities over server-name assumptions.
- Distinctive: line 91
Must not install MCP servers without explicit user approval.
- Distinctive: line 92
Must not change Codex, Claude, Cursor, VS Code, MCP, shell, package manager, or project configuration without explicit user approval.
- Distinctive: line 93
Must not run package installs.
- Distinctive: line 94
Must not access production systems or secrets.
- Distinctive: line 122
Prefer callable Figma MCP reads.
- Distinctive: line 131
Use prompt intent routing first.
- Distinctive: line 132
Do not expand a lightweight task into tool setup unless the user asked for tool setup or the missing capability blocks required …
- Distinctive: line 136
Treat it as the only bundle source for required, conditional, optional, and blocked capabilities.
- Distinctive: line 139
Do not scan every skill unless onboarding or full toolchain audit is explicitly requested.
- Distinctive: line 162
Do not claim tool-based verification if the provider is missing.
- Very specific: line 163
Do not treat package.json, lockfiles, local Playwright dependencies, or a running dev server as proof of MCP availability.
- Very specific: line 164
Do not treat client config, provider names, or agents/openai.yaml as proof of availability.
- Distinctive: line 166
Verify official install source when installation is relevant.
- Very specific: line 167
Use accepted sources from common/mcp-installation-policy.md.
- Distinctive: line 170
Ask approval before installation or configuration changes.
- Very specific: line 182
Update project/mcp-profile.md only when durable state is useful for the project.
- Very specific: line 194
When writing or updating project/mcp-profile.md, use these sections:
- Distinctive: line 257
no tool was installed without explicit approval.
- Distinctive: line 258
no config was changed without explicit approval.
- Distinctive: line 259
no package install was performed.
- Distinctive: line 267
no UI component library or testing skill was introduced.
- Distinctive: line 268
no production systems or secrets were accessed.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
MCP Toolchain Manager
Purpose
Detect, explain, validate, and record tool capabilities needed by WebDev Agent Kit skills without turning tool setup into automatic or unsafe behavior.
This skill exists to keep MCP usage deliberate. It identifies which capabilities are required for the current workflow, which providers are already available, which providers are missing, what each missing capability blocks, which fallback is allowed, and what official source must be verified before installation or configuration is proposed.
When To Use
Use this skill when:
- a selected skill declares capability dependencies in
tool-capabilities-manifest.json; - a task requires rendered UI verification, official documentation lookup, project context retrieval, visual references, GitHub metadata, or another external capability;
- the agent needs to audit available vs missing MCP servers, native tools, connectors, or fallbacks;
- the user asks what MCP servers or tools are required for the skill pack;
- the user asks to install, configure, validate, or troubleshoot MCP tools;
project/mcp-profile.mdmust be created or refreshed;- a missing tool limitation must be reported before fallback behavior.
Use this skill in Standard Workflow or Deep Workflow when tool capability affects the current slice.
It may also be used in Lightweight Workflow only when the user directly asks about MCP/tool availability or when a missing already-required capability prevents a narrow task from being verified.
When Not To Use
Do not use this skill just because a task exists.
Do not use this skill for:
- one small bug when no external tool is needed;
- one obvious type error;
- one small styling adjustment that does not require rendered verification;
- documentation-only edits unrelated to MCP/tooling;
- generic planning that does not depend on tool capabilities.
Do not install tools from this skill unless the user explicitly approved that installation in the current task context and the official source was verified.
Do not use this skill to implement frontend code, write tests, scaffold projects, create UI library setups, or access production systems.
Required Context
- Read
AGENTS.md. - Read
common/tool-capability-model.md. - Read
common/mcp-installation-policy.mdwhen installation or configuration is in scope. - Read
common/prompt-intent-routing-rules.mdwhen workflow level is unclear. - Read
tool-capabilities-manifest.jsonfor selected skills and capabilities. - Read
common/codex-official-docs-policy.mdonly whenopenai_platform_docsis active. - Read selected
agents/openai.yamlfiles only when Codex UI or invocation metadata matters; never use them as capability declarations or availability evidence. - Read
project/mcp-profile.mdwhen it exists and the task needs durable tool state. - Read
project/verification-profile.mdonly when verification commands influence tool needs. - Do not read all skills or all YAML files during normal routing.
Tool Contract
- May read
tool-capabilities-manifest.json, selected skill metadata, Codex UI metadata when relevant, and local-onlyproject/mcp-profile.md. - May read or update
project/mcp-profile.mdwhen durable tool state is needed. - May search official documentation only to verify installation sources or current client/tool docs.
- For active OpenAI questions, prefer a callable official OpenAI Developer Docs MCP provider, then the official web fallback; do not call either for generic frontend facts.
- Must prefer declared capabilities over server-name assumptions.
- Must not install MCP servers without explicit user approval.
- Must not change Codex, Claude, Cursor, VS Code, MCP, shell, package manager, or project configuration without explicit user approval.
- Must not run package installs.
- Must not access production systems or secrets.
- Route live design inspection to
design-screenshot-spec; this skill maps provider availability and does not acquire design content or edit canvases.
Core Tool Capabilities
Core capability vocabulary is defined in common/tool-capability-model.md and tool-capabilities-manifest.json.
Expected high-value capabilities:
project_files
command_execution
current_library_docs
web_platform_docs
rendered_visual_evidence
openai_platform_docs
client_platform_docs
repo_metadata
design_reference_filesConditional design acquisition through design-screenshot-spec:
live_design_sourcePrefer callable Figma MCP reads; fall back to browser/computer use with canvas pointer interaction and property-panel screenshots. Screenshot-only input needs no live provider. The capability excludes design writes and automatic setup.
Core does not mean always installed or always used. Use only what the current workflow needs.
Workflow
- Identify the active task and selected skill chain.
- Use prompt intent routing first.
- Do not expand a lightweight task into tool setup unless the user asked for tool setup or the missing capability blocks required verification.
- Collect required capability declarations.
- Inspect
tool-capabilities-manifest.jsonfor selected skills. - Treat it as the only bundle source for required, conditional, optional, and blocked capabilities.
- Inspect
agents/openai.yamlonly when Codex UI or invocation metadata must be aligned. - Record required, required-when-in-scope, optional, and blocked capabilities.
- Do not scan every skill unless onboarding or full toolchain audit is explicitly requested.
- Inspect
- Determine need for the current slice.
- Required for this slice.
- Required only when visual QA or another conditional workflow is in scope.
- Useful but optional.
- Not needed.
- Explicitly blocked.
- Compare capabilities with available providers.
- Callable in the current session registry, including native host tools.
- Recorded as validated in the local-only project profile.
- Directly confirmed by the user only for supplied design references.
- Missing.
- Approved for install.
- Installed and validated.
- Skipped.
- Blocked.
- Unknown.
- Explain missing capability impact.
- State what cannot be verified or automated without the capability.
- State the allowed fallback and confidence level when fallback is allowed.
- Do not claim tool-based verification if the provider is missing.
- Do not treat
package.json, lockfiles, local Playwright dependencies, or a running dev server as proof of MCP availability. - Do not treat client config, provider names, or
agents/openai.yamlas proof of availability.
- Verify official install source when installation is relevant.
- Use accepted sources from
common/mcp-installation-policy.md. - Reject random snippets, search summaries, unofficial forks, and generated guesses.
- Use accepted sources from
- Ask approval before installation or configuration changes.
The approval request must name:
- capability;
- provider/server name;
- target client and config scope;
- reason;
- official source;
- install/config action;
- expected validation step;
- risks or scope.
- Record toolchain state.
Update
project/mcp-profile.mdonly when durable state is useful for the project. - Hand off.
Return to the selected frontend skill with:
- capabilities available now;
- missing capabilities;
- active providers;
- approved fallbacks;
- verification limits.
Project MCP Profile Output
When writing or updating project/mcp-profile.md, use these sections:
Client
Capability State
Configured MCP Servers
Missing Capabilities
Optional Capabilities
Blocked Capabilities
Official Sources Verified
Approval State
Validation Results
Allowed Fallbacks
Confidence Impact
Last UpdatedTool entry shape:
Capability
Status
Provider
Availability Evidence
Required By
Reason
Current Task Need
Official Source
Install Approved
Validation
Fallback
Confidence Impact
NotesOutput Contract
Final response: return only facts that affect the user's understanding, confidence, or next action. Omit empty fields and workflow narration.
Return a Toolchain Report with:
Task
Workflow Level
Selected Skill Chain
Required Capabilities
Available Capabilities
Available Providers
Missing Capabilities
Optional Capabilities
Blocked Capabilities
Official Sources Verified
Approval Needed
Allowed Fallbacks
Confidence Impact
MCP Profile Update
Next Skill Or Next StepValidation Gates
Before finishing, verify:
- no tool was installed without explicit approval;
- no config was changed without explicit approval;
- no package install was performed;
- official sources are recorded for proposed installations;
- missing capability limitations are explicit;
- fallback confidence is honest;
project/mcp-profile.mdwas updated only when durable state is useful;- server names were not treated as capabilities;
- local dependencies, config entries, provider names, or running servers were not reported as MCP availability;
- optional provider absence did not trigger installation work;
- no UI component library or testing skill was introduced;
- no production systems or secrets were accessed.
Trigger Evals
Should trigger:
- "Check which MCP servers this skill pack needs."
- "Do we have Playwright MCP available for visual QA?"
- "Set up the MCP tools, but show me the official install sources first."
- "Update project/mcp-profile.md after onboarding."
- "This skill requires rendered visual evidence and MDN; tell me what is missing."
- "Which capabilities are missing for Cursor visual QA?"
Should not trigger:
- "Fix this TypeScript error."
- "Change this local CSS background color."
- "Run visual QA now with the browser tool that is already available."
Reference Map
common/codex-official-docs-policy.mdcommon/tool-capability-model.mdcommon/mcp-installation-policy.mdtool-capabilities-manifest.jsoncommon/prompt-intent-routing-rules.mdproject/mcp-profile.md
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

