pre-mortem
Skill20 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use for a pre-mortem, or before committing to a plan, launch or migration: "what could go wrong?", "stress test this plan", "how might this fail?", "risks before we ship". Assumes failure, lists causes, ranks them and sets mitigations. Skip for explaining a failure that already happened.
30 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- rahul-kulkarni105/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- cwhited26/pocket-agent-starter-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- yuusakuri/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Big-LAORE/Biblioth-que-de-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- daviszhen/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- takayoshitoyoda05/claude-ml-templatetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use brainstorm-experiments-existing, prioritize-assumptions and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
skytiger6724Skillbrainstorm-experiments-existing
Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.
Also in 7 projects that use this
skytiger6724Skillprioritize-assumptions
Prioritize assumptions using an Impact × Risk matrix and suggest experiments for each. Use when triaging a list of assumptions, deciding what to test first, or applying the assumption prioritization canvas.
Also in 7 projects that use this
45ckSkillpestle-analysis
Also in 7 projects that use this
About-IntelligenceSkillpositioning-ideas
Brainstorm product positioning ideas differentiated from competitors.
Also in 7 projects that use this
About-IntelligenceSkillproduct-name
Brainstorm 5 unique, memorable product names with rationale aligned to brand values and target audience.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +5 more from skytiger6724
- +1 more from About-Intelligence
Other versions30 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 30
- avelikiy/great_cto★ 112same name
- MbappeWU/murder-board★ 15same name
- jackjin1997/ClawForge★ 12same name
- sergeeey/Claude-cod-top-2026★ 9same name
- carlkibler/agent-skills★ 6same name
- fzfclee/consulting-skills★ 6same name
- broomva/skills★ 4same name
- Adhamxon/claude-code-skills★ 2same name
- skytiger6724/qwen-skills★ 2same name
- yuusakuri/agent-skills★ 2same name
20 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- analytical-thinkingSkill
- creative-thinkingSkill
- critical-thinkingSkill
- design-thinkingSkill
- ethical-thinkingSkill
- fermi-estimationSkill
- first-principles-thinkingSkill
- five-whysSkill
- lateral-thinkingSkill
- prioritizationSkill
- six-thinking-hatsSkill
- strategic-thinkingSkill
- swot-analysisSkill
- systems-thinkingSkill
- thinking-method-selectorSkill
- tradeoff-analysisSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 23 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Before a launch, migration, reorg, contract, hire, architecture change or any hard-to-reverse commitment.
- Distinctive: line 26
Gather first: Read the plan, timeline, dependencies, past incidents and similar launches before generating causes.
- Distinctive: line 32
Write one sentence in the past tense: "It is [date].
- Distinctive: line 49
Add an owner (or "to be assigned").
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 23 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Pre-mortem
Gary Klein's technique: imagine the plan has already failed, then work backward to explain why. Assuming failure makes it safe to name risks that optimism hides.
When to use
- Before a launch, migration, reorg, contract, hire, architecture change or any hard-to-reverse commitment.
- "What could go wrong?", "stress test this", "play out the failure".
- A plan everyone likes and nobody has attacked.
Skip: explaining a failure that already happened, or reviewing the logic of an argument rather than a plan.
Before you start
- State in one block: Plan (what, who, by when), Failure definition (what "failed badly" means, observable), Horizon, and Pass (Imagine, Causes, Rank, Mitigate, Decide).
- Gather first. Read the plan, timeline, dependencies, past incidents and similar launches before generating causes. Ask up to 3 questions only for what tools cannot answer.
- Light path. Small ask: 6 causes, top 3 ranked, one mitigation each.
Steps
1. Imagine
Write one sentence in the past tense: "It is [date]. The [plan] failed badly: [failure definition]."
2. Causes
List reasons it failed. Cover different angles so they do not cluster: people and skills, process and timeline, technology and dependencies, customers and market, money, external events. Add one inversion prompt: "What would guarantee failure?" and list what you would then have to avoid. Each cause is a specific story ("the vendor API changes its rate limit during launch week"), not a category ("vendor risk").
3. Rank
For each cause give a plain-language likelihood, impact if it happens, and an early warning sign. Keep the top 5-8.
| Cause | Likelihood | Impact | Early warning |
4. Mitigate
For each top cause choose one:
- Prevent: change the plan so it cannot happen.
- Detect: a metric or check that shows it early.
- Respond: a rehearsed fallback.
Add an owner (or "to be assigned").
5. Decide
- Plan changes to make now.
- Tripwires: conditions under which the plan is paused, changed or stopped.
- Go / no-go statement: go as is, go with changes, or hold until named risks are reduced.
Pitfalls
- Generic risks ("scope creep") with no story. Write what it looks like when it happens.
- Everything high likelihood and high impact. Force a ranking; a list where all items matter does not guide action.
- Mitigations nobody owns. Name an owner or mark it unassigned.
- Using it on something already failed. That is a postmortem; use a root-cause method.
- Treating the output as a promise that nothing else will go wrong. Revisit at each tripwire.
Worked example: references/example.md.
Checklist
- Plan, failure definition and horizon stated
- Failure written in the past tense
- Causes are specific stories across several angles, plus an inversion prompt
- Ranked with likelihood, impact and an early warning sign
- Mitigations are prevent, detect or respond, with owners
- Tripwires and a go / no-go statement
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

