dual-column-self-check
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Run one of the ML/CS reproducibility checklists (ML Reproducibility Checklist, REFORMS, NeurIPS Paper Checklist, Model Cards, Datasheets for Datasets) against a paper as a reader-side audit, producing a category (Yes/No/NA) plus free-text reason per item. Use this whenever the user wants a reproducibility/completeness self-check run on an ML or CS paper — invoke this directly, it has no study-design gate in this package since these checklists are engineering self-audits, not clinical-study tools.
In this repository34 other files it gives its agents.
- acu-nugget-recallSkill
- argumentative-zoningSkill
- atomic-unit-matchingSkill
- atomic-unit-recall-aggregateSkill
- atomic-unit-writingSkill
- claim-label-predictionSkill
- claim-writingSkill
- domain-level-judgmentSkill
- engineering-config-gradingSkill
- first-pass-skimSkill
- keshav-three-passSkill
- multi-stage-cascade-extractionSkill
- paper-fetchSkill
- qalmriSkill
- qalmri-worksheetSkill
- qasper-evidence-qaSkill
- quality-appraisal-checklistSkill
- question-framingSkill
- rationale-selectionSkill
- reforms-gradingSkill
- reporting-standard-checklistSkill
- reproducibility-third-party-verificationSkill
- research-question-appraisalSkill
- rhetorical-structure-qualitySkill
- second-pass-graspSkill
- signalling-question-answeringSkill
- star-awardingSkill
- study-design-tool-gateSkill
- sum-threshold-scoringSkill
- template-slot-fillingSkill
- third-pass-deep-readSkill
- unit-classificationSkill
- unit-segmentationSkill
- worst-case-lookupSkill
The file
Files
Dual Column Self-Check
Category (Yes/No/NA) + free-text reason per item, across 5 ML/CS reproducibility checklists. Originally author-facing self-certification tools, reversed here for reader-side auditing — each item's framing must be flipped to a question before being answered.
Execution
Subagent — spawned via spawn-agent skill.
No upstream gate (intentional, not a gap)
Unlike quality-appraisal-checklist/reporting-standard-checklist, this SOP has no in-edge from study-design-tool-gate in the graph — its 5 checklists are ML/CS engineering self-audits, not tied to a clinical study design, so no study-design dispatch was ever drawn to it (spec §5's flagged note). Do not add a gate dependency here without revisiting that decision explicitly.
<!-- BEGIN available-tables (generated) -->Available SOPs
| SOP | When to use |
| spawn-agent | Spawn a customized CC subagent with full MCP tool access. |
<!-- END available-tables (generated) -->Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.