agentleFS
yogsoth-aiyogsoth-ai/north-star-crystallization/skills/final-validation/SKILL.md

final-validation

Skill2 starsChanged 6 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Self-review the North Star + ResearchBrief for completeness, consistency, and clarity before presenting to user. If issues found, return to specific tactic/SOP for targeted fix. If passes, present final output to user for confirmation.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Internal consistency: do any sections contradict each other?

    line 18

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Final Validation

Quality gate before final output.

Execution

Dialogue — inline, CC performs self-review then presents.

Self-Review Checks

  1. Placeholder scan: any TBD, empty sections, incomplete information?
  2. Internal consistency: do any sections contradict each other?
  3. Completeness: any critical information gaps that would block downstream work?
  4. Ambiguity: any requirement interpretable two different ways?

If Issues Found

Return to the specific tactic/SOP that can fix the gap. Targeted fix, not full re-run.

If Passes

Present North Star + ResearchBrief to user.

What to Ask

  • Is this the direction you want to pursue?
  • Does anything need adjustment?
  • Are you ready to move forward with this as your research brief?

Output

User-confirmed North Star + ResearchBrief (final artifacts).

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.