map-dependencies
Skill505 starsChanged 49 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Construct a dependency graph and identify cycles, critical paths, and parallelizable branches.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- rpraharaj/ai-sdlctheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Pthahnix/De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engineword for word, first seen Oct 9, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- Pthahnix/De-Anthropocentric-Research-Engine★ 504100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- rpraharaj/ai-sdlc★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository270 other files it gives its agents.
- abstract-structureSkill
- adjudicate-exchangeSkill
- adjust-abstraction-scopeSkill
- adversarial-deliberationSkill
- aggregate-rankingSkill
- analogical-discoverySkill
- analyze-constraints-readinessSkill
- analyze-experiment-resultsSkill
- analyze-future-scenariosSkill
- analyze-heterogeneitySkill
- analyze-interventionSkill
- analyze-leaderboard-dynamicsSkill
- analyze-patent-citation-networkSkill
- analyze-scaling-regimeSkill
- analyze-temporal-trajectorySkill
- apply-perturbationSkill
- apply-question-frameworkSkill
- apply-separation-principleSkill
- apply-stage-gateSkill
- apply-veto-filterSkill
- appreciative-reframeSkill
- assess-construct-validitySkill
- assess-evidence-saturationSkill
- assess-goal-feasibilitySkill
- assess-patent-claim-scopeSkill
- assess-patent-legal-statusSkill
- assess-prior-art-and-claimsSkill
- assess-problem-wickednessSkill
- assess-publication-biasSkill
- assess-question-qualitySkill
- assess-ranking-consistencySkill
- assess-readiness-dimensionSkill
- assess-removabilitySkill
- assess-sensitivitySkill
- assess-system-boundarySkill
- assumption-stress-testSkill
- atomize-claimSkill
- atomize-conceptSkill
- attach-evidence-to-relationSkill
- audit-benchmark-validitySkill
- audit-convergence-independenceSkill
- audit-data-contaminationSkill
- audit-explanatory-compressionSkill
- audit-reporting-qualitySkill
- audit-structural-equivalenceSkill
- audit-structure-consistencySkill
- audit-study-validitySkill
- audit-validator-independenceSkill
- biologize-problemSkill
- biomimetic-transferSkill
- build-concept-fanSkill
- build-current-reality-treeSkill
- build-domain-ontologySkill
- build-failure-chainSkill
- build-noncircularity-matrixSkill
- calibrate-adversarial-confidenceSkill
- calibrate-probability-forecastSkill
- canonicalize-entitySkill
- categorize-evidenceSkill
- challenge-assumptionSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 27
If dependency types and blocking relations are explicit, consider sequence-work as the next tactic.
- Distinctive: line 39
Every edge has direction, strength, and evidence.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
map-dependencies
Purpose
Construct a dependency graph and identify cycles, critical paths, and parallelizable branches.
Input contract
required: [items, dependency_evidence, relation_schema]
optional: [criticality_rule, execution_context, candidate_order]
constraints: [the graph contains at least 2 items when the source protocol applies; dependency direction and strength are explicit]Procedure
- Normalize item identifiers and proposed dependency relations.
- Classify each edge as strong or weak with evidence.
- Detect cycles, compute critical paths, and identify independent branches.
- Return the dependency graph and unresolved relation questions.
If dependency types and blocking relations are explicit, consider sequence-work as the next tactic.
Output contract
produces: [dependency_graph, cycle_register, critical_paths, independent_branches]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, open_questions]Quality gates
- At least 2 subproblems are represented where the source protocol applies.
- Every edge has direction, strength, and evidence; cycles are reported rather than silently linearized.
- Parallel branches are descriptive graph properties, not execution instructions.
Parameterization
The caller must provide item/subproblem schema, edge vocabulary, strength scale, evidence links, critical-path rule, and the scope in which parallel independence is assessed.
Failure and counterexamples
Reject self-justifying edges, cycles hidden by reordering, or "parallel" labels where shared prerequisites remain.
Provenance map
- resolved: hypothesis-formation/dependency-mapping
- resolved: creative-ideation/dependency-identification
Preserved source criteria ledger
| source | physical line | kind | source criterion |
| hypothesis-formation/dependency-mapping | 12 | numeric | Requires >=2 subproblems; labels strong/weak dependencies, detects cycles, identifies critical path and parallel opportunities. |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

