agentleFS
yeer0syeer0s/ultimate-seo-collection/skills/seo-content/SKILL.md

seo-content

Skill1 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub

Plans and audits search content: keyword research, intent and page type, topic clusters, briefs, programmatic pages without doorway risk, comparison pages with EU legal gates, local SEO, GSC page-2 audits and pre-publish gates. Use for "keyword research", "content gaps vs competitors", "content brief", "programmatic SEO", "comparison page", "page 2 queries", "cannibalisation". Not for links (seo-authority) or AI citations (seo-ai-search).

39 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use seo-agentic, seo-image-gen and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • AgriciDanielSkill

    seo-agentic

    Audit and fix agent readiness: the Lighthouse Agentic Browsing fraction, accessibility tree for agents, robots.txt and Content-Signal for AI agents, WAF treatment of agent traffic, llms.txt, Markdown delivery, ai-catalog.json, /.well-known discovery files, and WebMCP tools. Use when the user asks whether AI agents can use or browse the site, or about llms.txt or WebMCP. Exclude AI citability and brand signals (seo-geo) and commerce protocol depth (seo-ecommerce).

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • timruebenachSkill

    seo-image-gen

    AI image generation for SEO assets: OG/social preview images, blog hero images, schema images, product photography, infographics. Powered by Gemini via nanobanana-mcp. Requires banana extension installed. Use when user says \"generate image\", \"OG image\", \"social preview\", \"hero image\", \"blog image\", \"product photo\", \"infographic\", \"seo image\", \"create visual\", \"image-gen\", \"favicon\", \"schema image\", \"pinterest pin\", \"generate visual\", \"banner\", or \"thumbnail\".

    Also in 16 projects that use this

  • timruebenachSkill

    seo-cluster

    SERP-based semantic topic clustering for content architecture planning. Groups keywords by actual Google SERP overlap (not text similarity), designs hub-and-spoke content clusters with internal link matrices, and generates interactive visualizations. Optionally executes content creation if claude-blog is installed. Use when user says "topic cluster", "content cluster", "semantic clustering", "pillar page", "hub and spoke", "content architecture", "keyword grouping", or "cluster plan".

    Also in 15 projects that use this

  • megastepSkill

    seo-images

    Image optimization analysis for SEO and performance. Checks alt text, file sizes, formats, responsive images, lazy loading, and CLS prevention. Use when user says "image optimization", "alt text", "image SEO", "image size", or "image audit".

    Also in 23 projects that use this

  • megastepSkill

    seo-competitor-pages

    Generate SEO-optimized competitor comparison and alternatives pages. Covers "X vs Y" layouts, "alternatives to X" pages, feature matrices, schema markup, and conversion optimization. Use when user says "comparison page", "vs page", "alternatives page", "competitor comparison", or "X vs Y".

    Also in 23 projects that use this

  • mangollcSkill

    seo-backlinks

    Backlink analysis and link building strategy: competitor backlink profiling, outreach plan generation, monthly SEO reporting framework, toxic link identification, link opportunity scoring, and unlinked mention discovery.

    Also in 17 projects that use this

  • +3 more from timruebenach
  • +2 more from megastep

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 36 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Never forecast a published number onto a client site.

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    No rollout without a pre-declared revert rule (applicability, holdout, what stays fixed, metric + window, trigger).

    line 15
  3. Distinctive:

    If the intent cannot be named, the page is not ready to build.

    line 52

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 36 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

seo-content

Which queries are worth winning, which page owns each, and what that page must contain before it ships.

<!-- grammar-excerpt -->

Label every tactic with one of the 9 marks: [documented: <URL>, <date>] · [documented-secondary: …] · [unverified: …] · [measured: MARK, n=S, c=C] · [practitioner: anonymised sources · …] · [hypothesis] · [vendor] · [memory] · [unvalidated house heuristic]. Numbers keep their denominator; marks are counts, not verdicts; bundles support direction, not size. Never forecast a published number onto a client site; only the client's own GSC demand and funnel forecast. No rollout without a pre-declared revert rule (applicability, holdout, what stays fixed, metric + window, trigger). Repetition never proves; full grammar: skill seo-optimizer § Evidence marks.

<!-- /grammar-excerpt -->

Load rule

Open one reference per load-when row the question touches (a "by H2" row: only the part holding that H2); never a file "to be thorough". A pointer into another seo- skill's file is a citation: quote it, or first load that skill's SKILL.md and open the file through its own load-when row. Engine pages, ledger and practitioner parts and the crawler registry are lookup-only.

Load when

IDQuestion shapeOpen
CO1keyword researchthe part holding the step: part 1 (order, GSC, Bing, free sources) or part 2 (categorise, validate, prioritise, map)
CO2intent, page type, refresh, decayby H2: part 1 (intent, clusters, briefs, titles, scoring) or part 2 (refresh and decay triage, cannibalisation)
CO3programmatic pages, section riskby H2: part 1 (distinction, checklist, data tiers, patterns, playbooks) or part 2 (implementation, section-level risk check, when not to)
CO4comparison pages, EU legal gatesby H2: part 1 (subtypes, schema, fairness, claim audit, EU legal gates) or part 2 (rollout gates, comparison-site practice)
CO5GSC page 2, striking distanceby H2: part 1 (access, MCP guards, anonymisation, bands, segments) or part 2 (page audit, the three above you, output contract)
CO6briefs, personas, research before the briefby H2: part 1 (modes, rules, information gain, research, variants) or part 2 (competitor filter, output shape, personas, wireframes)
CO7pre-publish and pipeline gatespublishing-gates.md
CO8local and Mapslocal-and-maps-seo.md
CO9SERP clustering, page typespage-types-and-serp-clustering.md
CO10prompts for flow winsflow-win-prompts.md

Scripts (run, not loaded): scripts/gsc_bigquery.sql (GSC bulk export: low CTR, page 2, cannibalisation), scripts/autocomplete_expand.py (set both --hl and --gl).

Not mine

QuestionSkill
will an engine penalise this templateseo-engine-policies
does a content tactic workseo-evidence
links, PR, E-E-A-Tseo-authority
getting cited by AI answer enginesseo-ai-search
"can we say this" (claims)your claims review

Rules

  1. If the intent cannot be named, the page is not ready to build.
  2. One stable URL per distinct intent; identical bodies with changed titles or slugs are a doorway warning sign; check function (funnels to one page = doorway).
  3. Value per URL decides programmatic scale, not the production method.
  4. Comparison and credit/insurance pages pass the EU legal gates before a precise number ships.
  5. GSC first: own impressions beat any keyword-tool estimate.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.