python-engineering
Skill2 starsChanged 9 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Production Python engineering patterns covering architecture, observability, testing, performance/concurrency, and core practices. Use when designing Python systems, implementing async/sync APIs, setting up monitoring, structuring tests, optimizing performance, or following Python best practices.
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nledford/engineering-review-boardtheir own version, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- cmdr-chara/chara-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- cmdr-chara/codex-toolkittheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- novatic-cu/nova-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 20, 2026
- nafeeur/MaskShifttheir own version, first seen Sep 12, 2026
- caseyng/Claude-skillstheir own version, first seen May 22, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use rust-engineering, go-engineering and 1 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
pirafrankSkillrust-engineering
Apply pragmatic Rust engineering conventions when implementing, modifying, reviewing, or refactoring Rust code. Use for Rust CLI tools, system utilities, daemons, filesystem operations, network integrations, and security-sensitive code. Based on the official Rust guidelines and selected Google Rust Style Guide practices.
Also in 4 projects that use this
caseyngSkillgo-engineering
Senior Go engineering standards for production code. Module structure, error handling, interface design, concurrency, context propagation, testing, security, observability. Includes gomobile-specific constraints for cross-language bindings. Compose with code-integrity-guardrail go for verification. Trigger on: any Go implementation task, any gomobile binding, any Go component in pipeline.
Also in 4 projects that use this
SentrySkillsecurity-review
Finds exploitable application security vulnerabilities in code changes. Use for Warden security scans, appsec review, OWASP-style checks, authentication or authorization bugs, injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, secrets, unsafe crypto, webhook verification, open redirects, or sensitive data exposure.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- nledford/engineering-review-board★ 11same name
- ldilov/harness-forge★ 4same name
- cmdr-chara/chara-toolkit★ 2same name
- cmdr-chara/codex-toolkit★ 2same name
- nafeeur/MaskShift★ 2same name
- caseyng/Claude-skills★ 1same name
- novatic-cu/nova-skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-dev-guardrailsSkill
- owasp-api-security-top-10Skill
- owasp-cicd-top-10Skill
- owasp-cloud-native-top-10Skill
- owasp-iot-top-10Skill
- owasp-kubernetes-top-10Skill
- owasp-llm-top-10Skill
- owasp-mobile-top-10Skill
- owasp-privacy-top-10Skill
- owasp-serverless-top-10Skill
- owasp-top-10Skill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

