step-verification
Skill4 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
验证行政执法程序的每个步骤是否合法合规,确保程序链条完整无缺。
In this repository59 other files it gives its agents.
- .agents/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .agents/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- anomaly-detectionSkill
- change-assessmentSkill
- checklist-compileSkill
- compliance-judgmentSkill
- compliance-suggestionSkill
- criteria-matchingSkill
- cross-domain-tracingSkill
- document-normSkill
- document-reviewSkill
- evidence-reviewSkill
- fulltextSkill
- impact-analysisSkill
- ingestSkill
- law-applicationSkill
- license-breakdownSkill
- lintSkill
- pattern-recognitionSkill
- policy-monitorSkill
- procedure-reviewSkill
- public-participationSkill
- querySkill
- regulation-searchSkill
- researchSkill
- risk-identificationSkill
- standard-matchSkill
- time-limit-calcSkill
- trend-analysisSkill
- anomaly-detectionSkill
- change-assessmentSkill
- checklist-compileSkill
- compliance-judgmentSkill
- compliance-suggestionSkill
- criteria-matchingSkill
- cross-domain-tracingSkill
- document-normSkill
- document-reviewSkill
- evidence-reviewSkill
- fulltextSkill
- impact-analysisSkill
- ingestSkill
- law-applicationSkill
- license-breakdownSkill
- lintSkill
- pattern-recognitionSkill
- policy-monitorSkill
- procedure-reviewSkill
- public-participationSkill
- querySkill
- regulation-searchSkill
- researchSkill
- risk-identificationSkill
- standard-matchSkill
- step-verificationSkill
- time-limit-calcSkill
- trend-analysisSkill
The file
Files
Step Verification Skill — 步骤验证
功能
验证行政执法程序的每个步骤是否合法合规,确保程序链条完整无缺。
输入
{
"case_type": "行政处罚|行政强制|行政许可",
"steps": [
{
"step_name": "步骤名称",
"step_order": 1,
"executed": true,
"execution_time": "执行时间",
"executor": "执行人",
"documents": ["相关文书"]
}
],
"case_context": "案件背景"
}输出
{
"status": "合规|程序瑕疵|程序违法",
"verification_results": [
{
"step": "步骤名称",
"required": true,
"executed": true,
"order_correct": true,
"timing_compliant": true,
"document_complete": true,
"issues": ["问题列表"],
"severity": "高|中|低"
}
],
"missing_steps": ["缺失步骤"],
"order_issues": ["顺序问题"],
"timing_issues": ["时限问题"],
"summary": "验证结论"
}行政处罚标准步骤
- 立案:立案审批表 → 审批
- 调查取证:现场检查 → 询问 → 证据收集
- 审查:案件审查 → 法制审核
- 告知:处罚前告知 → 听取陈述申辩
- 决定:处罚决定审批 → 制作决定书
- 送达:依法送达处罚决定书
- 执行:督促执行 → 强制执行(如需)
- 结案:结案审批 → 归档
约束
- 每个步骤检查"是否执行、顺序是否正确、时限是否合规、文书是否完整"
- 程序违法可能导致处罚决定被撤销,需高严重度标注
- 区分"程序瑕疵"(可补正)和"程序违法"(不可逆)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

