weekly-review-planning
Skill28 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub
Weekly reset: commitments, stalled work, next-week plan.
11 other projects use a version of this, 10 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ashleysbrain/skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- PrisacariuRobert/sidematestheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- rakaarwaky/agents-arwakyedited, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- nobodyohm-web/Thotedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- barzzly/BarzzLyp_Agent_Skillsedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- NousResearch/hermes-agentedited, first seen Oct 2, 2026
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 10
- NousResearch/hermes-agent★ 262k98% same
- aivrar/portable-hermes-agent★ 23998% same
- Samin12/skills★ 895% same
- abduznik/abduznik-skills★ 298% same
- rmusser01/tldw-stuff★ 298% same
- ashleysbrain/skills★ 198% same
- barzzly/BarzzLyp_Agent_Skills★ 098% same
- nobodyohm-web/Thot★ 098% same
- rakaarwaky/agents-arwaky★ 024% same
- wlkerwong-boop/family-ai-skills★ 098% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- PrisacariuRobert/sidemates★ 9same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository69 other files it gives its agents.
- agent/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- cron/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- gateway/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- loki_cli/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- plugins/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- skills/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- tools/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- tui_gateway/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- web/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- llms-full.txtllms.txt
- apple-notesSkill
- apple-remindersSkill
- findmySkill
- imessageSkill
- claude-codeSkill
- codexSkill
- computer-useSkill
- loki-agentSkill
- opencodeSkill
- architecture-diagramSkill
- ascii-videoSkill
- baoyu-infographicSkill
- claude-designSkill
- design-mdSkill
- humanizerSkill
- manim-videoSkill
- p5jsSkill
- popular-web-designsSkill
- songwriting-and-ai-musicSkill
- sdlc-reviewSkill
- email-inbox-triageSkill
- himalayaSkill
- gif-searchSkill
- songseeSkill
- youtube-contentSkill
- obsidianSkill
- airtableSkill
- boxSkill
- document-to-action-itemsSkill
- docxSkill
- google-workspaceSkill
- mapsSkill
- meeting-action-itemsSkill
- notionSkill
- pdfSkill
- powerpointSkill
- product-price-monitorSkill
- teams-meeting-pipelineSkill
- xlsxSkill
- arxivSkill
- competitor-news-monitorSkill
- grounded-citationsSkill
- llm-wikiSkill
- xurlSkill
- codebase-inspectionSkill
- dogfoodSkill
- githubSkill
- inspecting-loki-desktop-domSkill
- loki-agent-skill-authoringSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 1 is common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
1
Common
Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Run a bounded weekly reset across the user's chosen systems.
- Very specific: line 26
Don't use for: daily briefs (see the google-workspace daily-brief reference) or single-inbox triage (email-inbox-triage).
- Common: line 56
Update tasks/projects, create calendar holds, archive processed items, and draft follow-ups only as approved.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Weekly Review and Planning
Run a bounded weekly reset across the user's chosen systems. This is a concrete recurring task, not a generic productivity methodology — the weekly-review Automation Blueprint schedules it as a cron job.
When to Use
- "Run my weekly review."
- "What did I commit to and what is slipping?"
- "Plan next week from my calendar, tasks, and notes."
- "Find stale projects and waiting items."
- A cron tick fires for a scheduled weekly review.
Don't use for: daily briefs (see the google-workspace daily-brief reference) or single-inbox triage (email-inbox-triage).
Procedure
1. Set systems and window
Confirm timezone, review period, planning horizon, authoritative task/project store, calendars, inboxes, and allowed writes. Default to recommendations/drafts, not mutations. Done when source-of-truth conflicts have a declared winner.
2. Review calendar evidence
Load google-workspace or the relevant calendar connector. Inspect the completed week for meetings and commitments, then the next 1-2 weeks for deadlines, travel, preparation, and capacity. Capture follow-ups implied by past events and conflicts ahead. Done when both retrospective and horizon are covered.
3. Clear capture inboxes
Review the task inbox, notes (obsidian, notion), flagged email (email-inbox-triage owns thread-level triage), and other declared capture points. Convert each item to next action, project, waiting, scheduled, someday, reference, archive, or delete proposal. Do not mutate until scope is approved. Done when remaining unprocessed items are counted and stated.
4. Reconcile active projects
For each project identify desired outcome, next action, owner, deadline, blocker, last meaningful activity, and source link. Flag projects with no next action, missed dates, duplicate records, or contradictory status. Done when every active project is actionable or explicitly paused.
5. Review waiting and commitments
Find promises made by the user and items owed by others. Propose follow-ups with dates and channels. Do not infer that silence means completion. Done when each waiting item has an owner and next review/follow-up date.
6. Build a capacity-aware plan
Estimate fixed calendar load and select a small set of weekly outcomes plus near-term next actions. Rank by consequence, deadline, dependency, and effort; do not fill every free hour. Done when the plan fits actual capacity and names deferred work.
7. Apply approved updates
Update tasks/projects, create calendar holds, archive processed items, and draft follow-ups only as approved. Read every changed record back from the provider. Done when verified writes match the review summary.
Output Shape
- Wins and completed commitments
- Overdue or at risk
- Waiting/follow-ups
- Stalled or ambiguous projects
- Next week's outcomes and calendar constraints
- Proposed updates awaiting approval
- Coverage gaps
Pitfalls
- Planning from tasks without calendar capacity.
- Carrying every unfinished item forward as high priority.
- Marking projects active with no next action.
- Silently deleting or rescheduling personal commitments.
- Treating silence from others as completion.
Verification
- Both the completed week and the planning horizon were covered, or gaps are stated.
- Every stalled/waiting flag traces to a specific record, event, or thread.
- No task, event, or note was mutated without approval; approved writes were read back.
- The plan names what was deferred, not just what was chosen.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

