agentleFS
wulawuluwulawulu/learn-claude-code-rs/skills/agent-builder/SKILL.md

agent-builder

Skill154 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub

Design and build AI agents for any domain. Use when users: (1) ask to "create an agent", "build an assistant", or "design an AI system" (2) want to understand agent architecture, agentic patterns, or autonomous AI (3) need help with capabilities, subagents, planning, or skill mechanisms (4) ask about Claude Code, Cursor, or similar agent internals (5) want to build agents for business, research, creative, or operational tasks Keywords: agent, assistant, autonomous, workflow, tool use, multi-step, orchestration

58 other projects use a version of this, 1 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use workflow-builder, benchmark and 5 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Hussain-ElfalahSkill

    workflow-builder

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • dragonflydbSkill

    benchmark

    Benchmark Dragonfly (and compare against Valkey/Redis) on local or remote cloud instances, then produce a performance + memory report with charts and a raw-data appendix. Use this whenever the user runs /benchmark, or asks to benchmark / load-test / measure throughput, QPS, latency, or memory efficiency of Dragonfly or another Redis-compatible server, to compare Dragonfly vs Valkey or Redis, or to generate a benchmark report. Trigger it even when the user just describes the goal ("see how fast Dragonfly is on this box", "compare memory per key vs Valkey") without saying the word "benchmark".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    onboard

    Onboard a service to sentry-options. Use when integrating a new service, creating schemas, or setting up the multi-repo sentry-options workflow.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • OpenAISkill

    audit

    Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    review

    Fixture review skill.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    grill-me

    A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +1 more from getsentry

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 25 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Design principle: Start with 3-5 capabilities.

    line 39
  2. Distinctive:

    Start simple. Add complexity only when real usage reveals the need:

    line 67
  3. Distinctive:

    Iteration reveals: - Start minimal, evolve from usage

    line 94

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 25 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Agent Builder

Build AI agents for any domain - customer service, research, operations, creative work, or specialized business processes.

The Core Philosophy

The model already knows how to be an agent. Your job is to get out of the way.

An agent is not complex engineering. It's a simple loop that invites the model to act:

LOOP:
  Model sees: context + available capabilities
  Model decides: act or respond
  If act: execute capability, add result, continue
  If respond: return to user

That's it. The magic isn't in the code - it's in the model. Your code just provides the opportunity.

The Three Elements

1. Capabilities (What can it DO?)

Atomic actions the agent can perform: search, read, create, send, query, modify.

Design principle: Start with 3-5 capabilities. Add more only when the agent consistently fails because a capability is missing.

2. Knowledge (What does it KNOW?)

Domain expertise injected on-demand: policies, workflows, best practices, schemas.

Design principle: Make knowledge available, not mandatory. Load it when relevant, not upfront.

3. Context (What has happened?)

The conversation history - the thread connecting actions into coherent behavior.

Design principle: Context is precious. Isolate noisy subtasks. Truncate verbose outputs. Protect clarity.

Agent Design Thinking

Before building, understand:

  • Purpose: What should this agent accomplish?
  • Domain: What world does it operate in? (customer service, research, operations, creative...)
  • Capabilities: What 3-5 actions are essential?
  • Knowledge: What expertise does it need access to?
  • Trust: What decisions can you delegate to the model?

CRITICAL: Trust the model. Don't over-engineer. Don't pre-specify workflows. Give it capabilities and let it reason.

Progressive Complexity

Start simple. Add complexity only when real usage reveals the need:

LevelWhat to addWhen to add it
Basic3-5 capabilitiesAlways start here
PlanningProgress trackingMulti-step tasks lose coherence
SubagentsIsolated child agentsExploration pollutes context
SkillsOn-demand knowledgeDomain expertise needed

Most agents never need to go beyond Level 2.

Domain Examples

Business: CRM queries, email, calendar, approvals Research: Database search, document analysis, citations Operations: Monitoring, tickets, notifications, escalation Creative: Asset generation, editing, collaboration, review

The pattern is universal. Only the capabilities change.

Key Principles

  1. The model IS the agent - Code just runs the loop
  2. Capabilities enable - What it CAN do
  3. Knowledge informs - What it KNOWS how to do
  4. Constraints focus - Limits create clarity
  5. Trust liberates - Let the model reason
  6. Iteration reveals - Start minimal, evolve from usage

Anti-Patterns

PatternProblemSolution
Over-engineeringComplexity before needStart simple
Too many capabilitiesModel confusion3-5 to start
Rigid workflowsCan't adaptLet model decide
Front-loaded knowledgeContext bloatLoad on-demand
MicromanagementUndercuts intelligenceTrust the model

Resources

Philosophy & Theory:

  • references/agent-philosophy.md - Deep dive into why agents work

Implementation:

  • references/minimal-agent.py - Complete working agent (~80 lines)
  • references/tool-templates.py - Capability definitions
  • references/subagent-pattern.py - Context isolation

Scaffolding:

  • scripts/init_agent.py - Generate new agent projects

The Agent Mindset

From: "How do I make the system do X?" To: "How do I enable the model to do X?"

From: "What's the workflow for this task?" To: "What capabilities would help accomplish this?"

The best agent code is almost boring. Simple loops. Clear capabilities. Clean context. The magic isn't in the code.

Give the model capabilities and knowledge. Trust it to figure out the rest.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.