nextflow-reviewer
Skill1 starsChanged 40 days agoMITView on GitHub
Review Nextflow DSL 2 implementations against spec acceptance tests. References implementation-principles, code-smells, nextflow-conventions, testing-principles, and agent-conduct. Launched as a clean-context subagent by orchestrator, bugfix, or pr-reviewer.
In this repository38 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-conductSkill
- bugfixSkill
- code-smellsSkill
- deliverSkill
- final-responseSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- go-conventionsSkill
- go-implementorSkill
- go-reviewerSkill
- go-test-strengthSkill
- implementation-principlesSkill
- nextflow-conventionsSkill
- nextflow-implementorSkill
- nextjs-fastapi-conventionsSkill
- nextjs-fastapi-implementorSkill
- nextjs-fastapi-reviewerSkill
- orchestratorSkill
- phase-creatorSkill
- phase-reviewerSkill
- prose-principlesSkill
- pr-resolverSkill
- pr-reviewerSkill
- python-conventionsSkill
- python-implementorSkill
- python-reviewerSkill
- spec-authorSkill
- spec-proofreaderSkill
- spec-reviewerSkill
- spec-writerSkill
- subagentsSkill
- swift-conventionsSkill
- swift-implementorSkill
- swift-reviewerSkill
- testing-principlesSkill
- tightenSkill
- unslopSkill
- verificationSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈6
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 8
Read and follow agent-conduct, implementation-principles,
- Distinctive: line 27
Run for every modified module.
- Distinctive: line 35
Every spec.md acceptance test must have a corresponding nf-test.
- Distinctive: line 51
No hardcoded paths; all input via params or channels.
- Distinctive: line 55
Every process specifies a container (docker + singularity).
- Very specific: line 57
Every process emits versions.yml with tool version(s).
- Distinctive: line 79
No errors for modified files.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Nextflow Reviewer Skill
Read and follow agent-conduct, implementation-principles, testing-principles, code-smells, and nextflow-conventions before starting.
You are a review subagent with clean context. Independently verify that code meets the spec and quality standards.
Review Procedure
For each item:
1. Read spec.md and all source/test files for the item(s).
2. Run tests
nf-test test modules/local/<tool>/tests/main.nf.testRun for every modified module. All must pass. Then run pipeline-level tests:
nf-test test3. Verify acceptance test coverage
Every spec.md acceptance test must have a corresponding nf-test. Reject missing, stubbed (unless data-size justified), circumvented, or hardcoded-result tests. Apply the testing-principles review rule.
4. Verify implementation correctness
- Apply all rules from implementation-principles.
- Match the changed code against code-smells. Report each hit as a judgement call with the hunk quoted, unless a convention or an implementation-principles rule makes it blocking.
- One process per module file under
modules/local/<tool>/main.nf. - Each module has
tests/main.nf.testwith snapshot assertions. - Processes use
metamap pattern:tuple val(meta), path(...). - Named output channels (
emit:), not positional. tag,labelon every process.- nf-core modules used where available; no hand-edited
modules/nf-core/. - No hardcoded paths; all input via params or channels.
5. Verify containers and versions
- Every process specifies a container (docker + singularity).
- Containers sourced from nf-core/BioContainers/Seqera Wave/official images.
- Every process emits
versions.ymlwith tool version(s). - Final
versions.ymlaggregated in the main workflow.
6. Verify configuration
nextflow.config: default params, profile includes.conf/base.config: resource labels (process_low,_medium,_high).conf/modules.config: publishDir and ext.args per module.- Profiles: at minimum
docker,singularity,test.
7. Verify documentation
docs/usage.md: params, input format, run examples.docs/output.md: all output files described.README.md: overview, quick start.
8. Lint
nf-core pipelines lintNo errors for modified files.
9. Verdict
- PASS - optionally note minor non-blocking suggestions.
- FAIL - specific, actionable feedback: missing tests, unmet spec requirements, missing containers, missing versions, config gaps, doc gaps.
Batch Reviews
- Single-item: review that item.
- Parallel batch: review ALL items together; return per-item verdict.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

