compose-migration
Skill0 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub
Interop and incremental migration between Android Views and Jetpack Compose: ComposeView lifecycle strategy in Fragments, AndroidView factory/update split, XML layout interop, and migration ordering. Use when embedding composables in View hierarchies, wrapping legacy views, or planning a View-to-Compose migration. Core rules have machine checks in checks/.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- android-testingSkill
- compose-architectureSkill
- compose-multiplatformSkill
- compose-performanceSkill
- compose-testingSkill
- dependency-injectionSkill
- gradle-build-logicSkill
- kmp-fundamentalsSkill
- material3-themingSkill
- offline-firstSkill
- release-engineeringSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
After ANY interop or migration edit, run the Verification step (bottom of this file).
- Very specific: line 55
MUST keep the factory lambda pure: create the view and nothing else — it runs once at instantiation, so state read there goes stale.
- Very specific: line 85
When a layout hosts more than one ComposeView, each MUST have a unique android:id, or savedInstanceState restoration breaks.
- Very specific: line 117
No deterministic check covers ordering.
- Distinctive: line 122
Run after every interop or migration edit (from the project root):
- Very specific: line 130
All three must pass (exit 0) before declaring the task done.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Compose Migration
Operational rules for a coding agent. RIGHT/WRONG pairs are canonical. After ANY interop or migration edit, run the Verification step (bottom of this file).
1. ComposeView in Fragments — set the composition strategy
MUST set
setViewCompositionStrategy(ViewCompositionStrategy.DisposeOnViewTreeLifecycleDestroyed)
on every ComposeView used inside a Fragment, so the composition disposes
with the Fragment's view lifecycle. The default strategy
(DisposeOnDetachedFromWindowOrReleasedFromPool) disposes on window
detach and may cause state loss during incremental migration.
WRONG:
class ProfileFragment : Fragment() {
override fun onCreateView(...): View =
ComposeView(requireContext())
.apply { setContent { ProfileScreen() } }
}RIGHT:
class ProfileFragment : Fragment() {
override fun onCreateView(...): View =
ComposeView(requireContext()).apply {
setViewCompositionStrategy(
ViewCompositionStrategy.DisposeOnViewTreeLifecycleDestroyed
)
setContent { ProfileScreen() }
}
}Fragments are a transitionary step: Compose-only screens belong in a single-Activity architecture without Fragments.
2. AndroidView — factory creates once, update reads state
MUST keep the factory lambda pure: create the view and nothing else —
it runs once at instantiation, so state read there goes stale. MUST read
Compose state in update, which reruns whenever the state it reads
changes. MUST NOT hold view references outside AndroidView via
remember.
WRONG:
AndroidView(
factory = { context ->
TextView(context).apply { text = count.value.toString() } // stale
},
)RIGHT:
AndroidView(
factory = { context -> TextView(context) },
update = { view -> view.text = count.value.toString() },
)Reach for AndroidView only for SDK components without a Compose
counterpart (ads, maps, WebView); custom views are better rewritten as
composables. In lazy lists and pagers use the AndroidView overload with
onReset (1.4.0+) so the underlying view instance is reused.
3. XML interop — unique IDs for multiple ComposeViews
When a layout hosts more than one ComposeView, each MUST have a unique
android:id, or savedInstanceState restoration breaks.
WRONG:
<androidx.compose.ui.platform.ComposeView android:layout_width="match_parent" />
<androidx.compose.ui.platform.ComposeView android:layout_width="match_parent" />RIGHT:
<androidx.compose.ui.platform.ComposeView android:id="@+id/header_compose" ... />
<androidx.compose.ui.platform.ComposeView android:id="@+id/body_compose" ... />Embed legacy XML during migration via AndroidViewBinding
(androidx.compose.ui:ui-viewbinding) — for small legacy layouts only,
never for full screens.
4. Migration order (review-verified)
- New features and screens: Compose first — ComposeView in the Fragment's
onCreateViewwith the strategy above while navigation is still Fragment-based. - Existing screens: migrate bottom-up — reusable leaf elements first, building a shared component library as the source of truth, one screen at a time; start with simple screens.
- Navigation: move to Navigation Compose only after all Fragments are replaced by screen-level composables; keep Fragment navigation until then.
- Rely on UI tests across migration steps to catch regressions.
No deterministic check covers ordering; verify against references/migration.md.
Verification
Run after every interop or migration edit (from the project root):
bash <skill-dir>/checks/check_composeview_fragment_strategy.sh <src-dir>
bash <skill-dir>/checks/check_androidview_factory_state.sh <src-dir>
bash <skill-dir>/checks/check_composeview_ids_in_xml.sh <res-or-src-dir>All three must pass (exit 0) before declaring the task done. Checks are deterministic file-level heuristics — they catch the documented anti-patterns above, not every migration bug. Ordering (§4) is verified by review against references/migration.md.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

