progress-tracker
Skill0 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Track multi-step AI task progress with a local checklist and optional GitHub Issue sync. Use this whenever the user describes a workflow with 2+ steps, starts a long-running command (training, inference, batch processing, data processing), asks about task status or progress, or mentions checklists, subtasks, or tracking progress — even if they don't explicitly ask for a progress tracker. Two-layer system: Skill layer (conversation-driven) + Runtime layer (importable Python decorator/tracker/CLI for autonomous reporting from training jobs).
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- mattbutlerengineering/mattbutlerengineeringtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- mfielding92/claude-code-experttheir own version, first seen Mar 23, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 2
- mattbutlerengineering/mattbutlerengineering★ 3same name
- mfielding92/claude-code-expert★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. About 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈8
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Detect, don't invent: Only create tasks when the user has actual multi-step work — not for single commands or trivial one-liners.
- Very specific: line 14
Confirm before writing: When you detect a multi-step workflow, print the proposed task tree and ask the user to confirm before running init.
- Very specific: line 16
Scripts are authoritative: Always use the bundled scripts to read and write progress state.
- Distinctive: line 18
Update silently: When a step completes during normal execution, update its status without announcing it to the user.
- Distinctive: line 20
Alert loudly on failure: When a command exits non-zero, times out, or hits a known error, flag the task with an alert and tell the user …
- Distinctive: line 24
Use this skill when any of these patterns appear:
- Distinctive: line 81
Ask: "Want me to sync this to a GitHub Issue?" — do not push without asking.
- Very specific: line 85
When a step completes, update its status to done immediately.
- Distinctive: line 87
Only display the full tracker when:
- Very specific: line 94
When a command exits non-zero, times out, or produces a recognizable error, run progress.py alert with a short, actionable message.
- Very specific: line 96
Run progress.py show so the user sees the full state including the alert.
- Distinctive: line 97
Do not advance to the next step until the user confirms the issue is resolved.
- Distinctive: line 106
Always ask before pushing.
- Very specific: line 110
When the user's project contains training/inference scripts that need autonomous progress reporting (without AI conversation), recommend …
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Progress Tracker
Track multi-step AI tasks with a local progress.json file, automatic status updates, and optional GitHub Issue sync.
Core Rules
- Detect, don't invent. Only create tasks when the user has actual multi-step work — not for single commands or trivial one-liners. If there is only one step, there is nothing to track.
- Confirm before writing. When you detect a multi-step workflow, print the proposed task tree and ask the user to confirm before running
init. This avoids creating trackers the user did not want. - Scripts are authoritative. Always use the bundled scripts to read and write progress state. Never edit
progress.jsonby hand — the scripts handle status transitions and parent-child consistency automatically. - Update silently. When a step completes during normal execution, update its status without announcing it to the user. Show progress only at milestones (a parent task reaches 100%), when the user explicitly asks, or on failure.
- Alert loudly on failure. When a command exits non-zero, times out, or hits a known error, flag the task with an alert and tell the user immediately. Alerts persist in the tracker until the task is resolved.
When to Trigger
Use this skill when any of these patterns appear:
- The user describes a workflow with 2 or more distinct steps
- The user starts a long-running command (model training, inference, data processing, batch job)
- The user asks "how is X going?", "what's the status?", or "where are we?"
- The user explicitly asks to track progress, create a checklist, or manage subtasks
- A task naturally decomposes into sequential phases that each need confirmation
Script Reference
Scripts live in scripts/ next to this SKILL.md. All commands operate on progress.json in the current project root.
<SKILL_DIR> is the directory containing this SKILL.md — resolve it from the skill's install path (typically ~/.claude/skills/progress-tracker/ for manual installs).
progress.py
# init - Create a new progress tracker with a top-level task and subtasks
python <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/progress.py init \
--title "Fine-tune Qwen2.5" \
--subtasks "Prepare data,Configure training,Start training,Evaluate model"
# update - Change a task status (auto-syncs parent)
python <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/progress.py update --id t1.2 --status done
# show - Display the full progress tree
python <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/progress.py show
# show - Display only one task and its children
python <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/progress.py show --id t1
# alert - Flag a task with an error or warning message
python <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/progress.py alert --id t1.3 --msg "CUDA OOM at step 1500, try reducing batch size"Status values are pending, in_progress, and done. Task IDs use dotted hierarchy: t1 (parent), t1.1, t1.2 (children). Maximum depth is 2 levels.
sync.py
# push - Sync local progress.json to a GitHub Issue (auto-detects or creates)
python <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/sync.py push
# pull - Download progress from a GitHub Issue and overwrite local file (confirms first)
python <SKILL_DIR>/scripts/sync.py pullSync requires the gh CLI to be authenticated and the project to have a GitHub remote. The Issue title is Progress: <project-name>.
Workflows
Starting a New Task
- Detect that the user's request has 2+ distinct steps.
- Propose a task tree in conversation: "I will track this: Fine-tune Qwen2.5 with 4 subtasks: Prepare data, Configure training, Start training, Evaluate model. Create the tracker?"
- On confirmation, run
progress.py initwith the title and comma-separated subtasks. - Show the result with
progress.py showso the user sees the checklist. - Ask: "Want me to sync this to a GitHub Issue?" — do not push without asking.
Updating During Execution
- When a step completes, update its status to
doneimmediately. Do not announce. - Mark the next step
in_progressbefore starting it. - Only display the full tracker when:
- A parent task reaches 100% (all children done) — milestone achieved
- The user asks "how's it going?" or "show progress"
- A failure occurs (see below)
Handling Failures
- When a command exits non-zero, times out, or produces a recognizable error, run
progress.py alertwith a short, actionable message. - Tell the user: "Task
<name>hit an error:<message>. Marked in the progress tracker." - Run
progress.py showso the user sees the full state including the alert. - Do not advance to the next step until the user confirms the issue is resolved.
Syncing to GitHub
Suggest syncing when:
- The user explicitly asks to sync or push
- A major milestone is reached (parent task hits 100%)
- The session is ending and there are active (non-done) tasks
Always ask before pushing. Pulling overwrites the local file, so it always prompts for confirmation.
Runtime Layer
When the user's project contains training/inference scripts that need autonomous progress reporting (without AI conversation), recommend scripts/runtime.py:
# Decorator (import into Python)
from runtime import track
@track(task_id="t1.3")
def train(): ...
# Manual tracker
from runtime import RuntimeTracker
tracker = RuntimeTracker(task_id="t1.3")
tracker.start(); tracker.report(pct=50, msg="Half done"); tracker.done()
# CLI (shell scripts)
python runtime.py report --id t1.3 --pct 60 --msg "Batch 600/1000"
python runtime.py watch --id t1.3 --interval 5 --timeout 3600Display Format
The show command renders a tree with progress bars and status markers:
Progress Tracker - 2026-05-29T14:30:00
+ Fine-tune Qwen2.5 [==== ] 40%
[x] Prepare data
[x] Configure training
[ ] Start training <- in progress
[ ] Evaluate model
Total: 2/4 done (50%)Markers: [x] done, [ ] pending, <- in progress for the active step. Alerted tasks show !! <message> appended. The bar is a 10-char visual scaled to the percentage.
Data Model
The tracker writes a progress.json file at the project root. The full JSON Schema is at <SKILL_DIR>/assets/progress.schema.json.
Key constraints:
- Task tree is maximum 2 levels deep (parent tasks with children, no grandchildren)
- Each task has exactly one of three statuses:
pending,in_progress,done - Task IDs are auto-generated:
t1for the first parent,t1.1,t1.2etc. for children - Parent status is auto-computed from children: all done -> done, any in_progress -> in_progress, otherwise pending
- Percentages are computed from child statuses, never stored — no stale numbers
- Alerts are optional string fields that persist until the task is updated
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

