agentleFS
wpultimatesecuritywpultimatesecurity/WordPress-Security-Skills/skills/gutenberg-block-editor-security/SKILL.md

gutenberg-block-editor-security

Skill45 starsChanged 54 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when building dynamic blocks or block-editor features - a render_callback, server-side rendered blocks via ServerSideRender, REST-backed block data, or register_rest_field for the editor. Sanitizes block attributes per type, escapes server render output, sets a real permission_callback on editor REST surfaces, and handles RichText content with wp_kses. Prevents stored XSS and broken access control in the editor.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill whenever code interacts with the block editor beyond simple static blocks:

    line 20
  2. Very specific:

    RichText allows markup — constrain it: Use wp_kses_post() or a custom allowlist instead of raw storage.

    line 43
  3. Distinctive:

    If the block needs server-side rendering in the editor, ensure the underlying data source enforces permissions.

    line 55
  4. Very specific:

    Add schema with arg_options sanitize/validate callbacks.

    line 58
  5. Very specific:

    Treat RawHTML, dangerouslySetInnerHTML, innerHTML, and jQuery .html() as sinks in admin and editor JavaScript.

    line 200

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Gutenberg block editor security

When to use this skill

Use this skill whenever code interacts with the block editor beyond simple static blocks:

  • Building dynamic blocks with a PHP render_callback.
  • Using ServerSideRender to fetch server-rendered markup in the editor.
  • Exposing or saving block data via register_rest_field().
  • Handling RichText content or allowing markup in block attributes.
  • Enqueuing block-editor assets that call custom REST endpoints.

The block editor trusts server-rendered HTML and REST field values. If the server returns unescaped data or allows unauthorized writes, the vulnerability lands inside the editor UI and the saved post content.

Related: see the shortcode-block-security skill for attribute sanitization basics and the rest-api-security skill for REST endpoints.

Core principles (and why they matter)

  1. Block attributes are user input. Declaring a type in block.json validates shape but does not sanitize HTML or JavaScript. Sanitize in render_callback.
  2. Server render output must be escaped. The editor and front-end both render the callback's return value; escape for the context (HTML, attribute, URL, rich text).
  3. Editor REST fields need real permission callbacks. register_rest_field() update_callback must check current_user_can( 'edit_post', $post_id ) or a matching capability.
  4. RichText allows markup — constrain it. Use wp_kses_post() or a custom allowlist instead of raw storage.
  5. ServerSideRender requests are REST requests. They are public unless the block's REST route or render callback enforces capability checks.
  6. Use apiFetch with the X-WP-Nonce header. Modern editor JS uses apiFetch, which adds the nonce automatically for same-site REST requests.

Step-by-step implementation

  1. Define block attributes in block.json with types and defaults.
  2. In the PHP render_callback, sanitize each attribute before use.
  3. Build markup with escaped values (esc_html, esc_attr, esc_url, wp_kses_post).
  4. If the block needs server-side rendering in the editor, ensure the underlying data source enforces permissions.
  5. For register_rest_field() used by the block:
    • Add schema with arg_options sanitize/validate callbacks.
    • In update_callback, check the acting user's capability on the object.
  6. For RichText, sanitize on save with wp_kses_post() and escape on render.

Supporting references

ReferenceLoad when
Gutenberg block editor security checklistBefore final verification of the gutenberg block editor security controls.
Secure block editor integrationImplementing a dynamic block render callback and capability-gated REST field updates.

Common AI mistakes / anti-patterns

Mistake 1 — Render callback echoing attributes unescaped

// ❌ Insecure: stored XSS through a block attribute.
function my_plugin_render_alert( $attributes ) {
    return '<div class="alert">' . $attributes['message'] . '</div>';
}
// ✅ Secure: sanitize and escape the attribute.
function my_plugin_render_alert( $attributes ) {
    $message = isset( $attributes['message'] ) ? sanitize_text_field( $attributes['message'] ) : '';
    return '<div class="alert">' . esc_html( $message ) . '</div>';
}

Mistake 2 — register_rest_field update_callback with no capability check

// ❌ Insecure: any authenticated user can update the field.
register_rest_field( 'post', 'my_plugin_meta', array(
    'get_callback'    => function ( $object ) {
        return get_post_meta( $object['id'], '_my_plugin_meta', true );
    },
    'update_callback' => function ( $value, $object ) {
        update_post_meta( $object->ID, '_my_plugin_meta', $value );
    },
) );
// ✅ Secure: check capability before updating; sanitize value.
register_rest_field(
    'post',
    'my_plugin_meta',
    array(
        'get_callback'    => function ( $object ) {
            return get_post_meta( $object['id'], '_my_plugin_meta', true );
        },
        'update_callback' => function ( $value, $object ) {
            if ( ! current_user_can( 'edit_post', $object->ID ) ) {
                return new WP_Error( 'forbidden', __( 'You cannot edit this post.', 'my-plugin' ), array( 'status' => 403 ) );
            }
            update_post_meta( $object->ID, '_my_plugin_meta', sanitize_text_field( $value ) );
            return true;
        },
        'schema'          => array(
            'type'        => 'string',
            'arg_options' => array(
                'sanitize_callback' => 'sanitize_text_field',
            ),
        ),
    )
);

Mistake 3 — Storing raw RichText without wp_kses_post

// ❌ Insecure: RichText can contain script tags and event handlers.
update_post_meta( $post_id, '_my_plugin_note', $attributes['note'] );
// ✅ Secure: constrain rich markup.
$note = isset( $attributes['note'] ) ? wp_kses_post( $attributes['note'] ) : '';
update_post_meta( $post_id, '_my_plugin_note', $note );

Mistake 4 — ServerSideRender of privileged data without checks

// ❌ Insecure: block preview reveals data the editor user may not be allowed to see.
function my_plugin_render_private( $attributes ) {
    return '<pre>' . get_option( 'my_plugin_secret_report' ) . '</pre>';
}
// ✅ Secure: enforce the same capability in render_callback.
function my_plugin_render_private( $attributes ) {
    if ( ! current_user_can( 'manage_options' ) ) {
        return '<p>' . esc_html__( 'You do not have permission to view this.', 'my-plugin' ) . '</p>';
    }
    $report = get_option( 'my_plugin_secret_report', '' );
    return '<pre>' . esc_html( $report ) . '</pre>';
}

Mistake 5 — Manual fetch without nonce

// ❌ Insecure: custom fetch to a REST endpoint without the nonce.
fetch( '/wp-json/my-plugin/v1/data' )
  .then( r => r.json() );
// ✅ Secure: use apiFetch, which attaches X-WP-Nonce automatically.
import apiFetch from '@wordpress/api-fetch';

apiFetch( { path: 'my-plugin/v1/data' } )
  .then( data => { /* ... */ } );

Mistake 6 — Trusting postMessage and raw HTML in editor code

// ❌ Insecure: any window (an embedded preview, an ad iframe, an opener) can
// post a message, and its HTML is rendered unsanitized in the editor.
window.addEventListener( 'message', ( event ) => {
  setAttributes( { html: event.data.html } );
} );
// ...
<RawHTML>{ attributes.html }</RawHTML>
// ✅ Secure: check origin and shape, and never render untrusted markup raw.
window.addEventListener( 'message', ( event ) => {
  if ( event.origin !== window.location.origin || typeof event.data?.text !== 'string' ) {
    return;
  }
  setAttributes( { text: event.data.text } );
} );
// Render as text (React escapes it), and sanitize server-side on render.

Treat RawHTML, dangerouslySetInnerHTML, innerHTML, and jQuery .html() as sinks in admin and editor JavaScript. Deep-merging settings from URL parameters, storage, or messages into objects (Object.assign, lodash.merge) can pollute prototypes; reject __proto__, constructor, and prototype keys.

Correct code examples

A secure dynamic block with render_callback and a REST field with permission checks is in references/secure-block-editor.php.

Checklist

  • Block attributes are declared in block.json with types and defaults.
  • render_callback sanitizes every attribute before use.
  • Server-rendered output is escaped for its context.
  • register_rest_field() used by the block has schema + sanitize/validate callbacks.
  • register_rest_field() update_callback checks the appropriate capability.
  • RichText and rich markup are constrained with wp_kses_post() or a custom allowlist.
  • ServerSideRender blocks enforce the same permissions as the front-end render.
  • Editor JS uses apiFetch (or sends X-WP-Nonce) for same-site REST calls.
  • No secrets are returned to the block editor for low-privilege users.
  • message listeners verify event.origin against an allowlist and validate the payload shape.
  • RawHTML / dangerouslySetInnerHTML / innerHTML never receive user- or message-controlled markup.
  • Settings deep-merged from URLs, storage, or messages reject __proto__, constructor, and prototype keys.

Official references

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.