distill
Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Strip designs to their essence by removing unnecessary complexity. Great design is simple, powerful, and clean.
75 other projects use a version of this, 32 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- venhdev/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kylehughes/distillation-for-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- komluk/scaffoldingtheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- Integralist/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- theexperiencecompany/gaiaedited, first seen Nov 3, 2026
- JHostalek/dotclaudetheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use layout, shape and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
owshq-mecSkilllayout
Improve layout, spacing, and visual rhythm. Fixes monotonous grids, inconsistent spacing, and weak visual hierarchy. Use when the user mentions layout feeling off, spacing issues, visual hierarchy, crowded UI, alignment problems, or wanting better composition.
Also in 8 projects that use this
HAR5HA-7663Skillshape
Plan the UX and UI for a feature before writing code. Runs a structured discovery interview, then produces a design brief that guides implementation. Use during the planning phase to establish design direction, constraints, and strategy before any code is written.
Also in 11 projects that use this
ReScienceLabSkillarchive
Archive session learnings, debugging solutions, and deployment logs to .archive/yyyy-mm-dd/ as indexed markdown with searchable tags. Use when completing a significant task, resolving a tricky bug, deploying, or when the user says \"archive this\". Maintains .archive/MEMORY.md index for cross-session knowledge reuse.
Also in 3 projects that use this
klauswgSkillckm:design-system
Token architecture, component specifications, and slide generation. Three-layer tokens (primitive→semantic→component), CSS variables, spacing/typography scales, component specs, strategic slide creation. Use for design tokens, systematic design, brand-compliant presentations.
Also in 3 projects that use this
iovisorSkillevolve
Evolve uBPF through a gated spec-first workflow that propagates approved changes through requirements, design, validation, implementation, and RFC alignment artifacts.
Also in 3 projects that use this
termdockSkillrecall
Retrieves cross-session memories about past decisions, lessons, and patterns. Use when user asks about prior work, past decisions, or mentions a feature. Triggers include check memory, what did we decide, how did we solve.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions75 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 32
- talesofai/cohub★ 58590% same
- nexmoe/DayBee★ 42492% same
- nexmoe/eve★ 42492% same
- Southclaws/storyden★ 34892% same
- 10xChengTu/Mux0★ 33790% same
- theexperiencecompany/gaia★ 32590% same
- AkaraChen/aghub★ 27190% same
- zacharyfmarion/openscad-studio★ 23892% same
- jagrat7/linux-wallpaper-engine★ 22791% same
- owshq-mec/semana-ai-data-engineer★ 12291% same
22 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 43
- juxt/allium★ 506same name
- educlopez/ui-craft★ 441same name
- Michaelliv/napkin★ 428same name
- wado-lang/wado★ 120same name
- griffinhilly/claude-code-synthesis★ 67same name
- Kastalien-Research/thoughtbox★ 64same name
- norrietaylor/distillery★ 25same name
- Integralist/agent-skills★ 23same name
- JinukMoon/oh-my-mlip★ 20same name
- eric-cielo/moflo★ 19same name
33 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
18 rules. 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 71 edited versions we read keep these.
18
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Remove unnecessary complexity from designs, revealing the essential elements and creating clarity through ruthless simplification.
- Distinctive: line 24
If you don't find *exact* information and have to infer from existing design and functionality, you MUST STOP and STOP and call the …
- Distinctive: line 27
Do NOT proceed until you have answers.
- Distinctive: line 53
If any of these are unclear from the codebase, STOP and call the AskUserQuestionTool to clarify.
- Distinctive: line 59
Create a ruthless editing strategy:
- Distinctive: line 73
Reduce scope: Remove secondary actions, optional features, redundant information
- Distinctive: line 77
Remove redundancy: If it's said elsewhere, don't repeat it here
- Distinctive: line 80
Reduce color palette: Use 1-2 colors plus neutrals, not 5-7 colors
- Distinctive: line 85
Consistent spacing: Use one spacing scale, remove arbitrary gaps
- Distinctive: line 90
Full-width: Use available space generously instead of complex multi-column layouts
- Distinctive: line 106
Essential information only: Remove marketing fluff, legalese, hedging
- Distinctive: line 107
Remove redundant copy: No headers restating intros, no repeated explanations, say it once
- Distinctive: line 116
Remove necessary functionality (simplicity ≠ feature-less)
- Distinctive: line 119
Remove information users need to make decisions
- Distinctive: line 125
Ensure simplification improves usability:
- Distinctive: line 135
If you removed features or options:
- Distinctive: line 136
Document why they were removed
- Distinctive: line 137
Consider if they need alternative access points
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 71 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Adapted from impeccable by Paul Bakaus, used under the Apache License 2.0. Modified for this collection; see NOTICE.md for what changed.
Remove unnecessary complexity from designs, revealing the essential elements and creating clarity through ruthless simplification.
MANDATORY PREPARATION
Context Gathering (Do This First)
You cannot do a great job without having necessary context, such as target audience (critical), desired use-cases (critical), and understanding what's truly essential vs nice-to-have for this product.
Attempt to gather these from the current thread or codebase.
- If you don't find exact information and have to infer from existing design and functionality, you MUST STOP and STOP and call the AskUserQuestionTool to clarify. whether you got it right.
- Otherwise, if you can't fully infer or your level of confidence is medium or lower, you MUST STOP and call the AskUserQuestionTool to clarify. clarifying questions first to complete your context.
Do NOT proceed until you have answers. Simplifying the wrong things destroys usability.
Load design guidelines when available
If a design-guidelines skill is installed (Anthropic's frontend-design, impeccable's /impeccable commands, or the project's own design system), load it first for principles and anti-patterns. If none is available, continue with the defaults in this file. Do not stop the task because a companion skill is missing.
Assess Current State
Analyze what makes the design feel complex or cluttered:
- Identify complexity sources:
- Too many elements: Competing buttons, redundant information, visual clutter
- Excessive variation: Too many colors, fonts, sizes, styles without purpose
- Information overload: Everything visible at once, no progressive disclosure
- Visual noise: Unnecessary borders, shadows, backgrounds, decorations
- Confusing hierarchy: Unclear what matters most
- Feature creep: Too many options, actions, or paths forward
- Find the essence:
- What's the primary user goal? (There should be ONE)
- What's actually necessary vs nice-to-have?
- What can be removed, hidden, or combined?
- What's the 20% that delivers 80% of value?
If any of these are unclear from the codebase, STOP and call the AskUserQuestionTool to clarify.
CRITICAL: Simplicity is not about removing features - it's about removing obstacles between users and their goals. Every element should justify its existence.
Plan Simplification
Create a ruthless editing strategy:
- Core purpose: What's the ONE thing this should accomplish?
- Essential elements: What's truly necessary to achieve that purpose?
- Progressive disclosure: What can be hidden until needed?
- Consolidation opportunities: What can be combined or integrated?
IMPORTANT: Simplification is hard. It requires saying no to good ideas to make room for great execution. Be ruthless.
Simplify the Design
Systematically remove complexity across these dimensions:
Information Architecture
- Reduce scope: Remove secondary actions, optional features, redundant information
- Progressive disclosure: Hide complexity behind clear entry points (accordions, modals, step-through flows)
- Combine related actions: Merge similar buttons, consolidate forms, group related content
- Clear hierarchy: ONE primary action, few secondary actions, everything else tertiary or hidden
- Remove redundancy: If it's said elsewhere, don't repeat it here
Visual Simplification
- Reduce color palette: Use 1-2 colors plus neutrals, not 5-7 colors
- Limit typography: One font family, 3-4 sizes maximum, 2-3 weights
- Remove decorations: Eliminate borders, shadows, backgrounds that don't serve hierarchy or function
- Flatten structure: Reduce nesting, remove unnecessary containers—never nest cards inside cards
- Remove unnecessary cards: Cards aren't needed for basic layout; use spacing and alignment instead
- Consistent spacing: Use one spacing scale, remove arbitrary gaps
Layout Simplification
- Linear flow: Replace complex grids with simple vertical flow where possible
- Remove sidebars: Move secondary content inline or hide it
- Full-width: Use available space generously instead of complex multi-column layouts
- Consistent alignment: Pick left or center, stick with it
- Generous white space: Let content breathe, don't pack everything tight
Interaction Simplification
- Reduce choices: Fewer buttons, fewer options, clearer path forward (paradox of choice is real)
- Smart defaults: Make common choices automatic, only ask when necessary
- Inline actions: Replace modal flows with inline editing where possible
- Remove steps: Can signup be one step instead of three? Can checkout be simplified?
- Clear CTAs: ONE obvious next step, not five competing actions
Content Simplification
- Shorter copy: Cut every sentence in half, then do it again
- Active voice: "Save changes" not "Changes will be saved"
- Remove jargon: Plain language always wins
- Scannable structure: Short paragraphs, bullet points, clear headings
- Essential information only: Remove marketing fluff, legalese, hedging
- Remove redundant copy: No headers restating intros, no repeated explanations, say it once
Code Simplification
- Remove unused code: Dead CSS, unused components, orphaned files
- Flatten component trees: Reduce nesting depth
- Consolidate styles: Merge similar styles, use utilities consistently
- Reduce variants: Does that component need 12 variations, or can 3 cover 90% of cases?
NEVER:
- Remove necessary functionality (simplicity ≠ feature-less)
- Sacrifice accessibility for simplicity (clear labels and ARIA still required)
- Make things so simple they're unclear (mystery ≠ minimalism)
- Remove information users need to make decisions
- Eliminate hierarchy completely (some things should stand out)
- Oversimplify complex domains (match complexity to actual task complexity)
Verify Simplification
Ensure simplification improves usability:
- Faster task completion: Can users accomplish goals more quickly?
- Reduced cognitive load: Is it easier to understand what to do?
- Still complete: Are all necessary features still accessible?
- Clearer hierarchy: Is it obvious what matters most?
- Better performance: Does simpler design load faster?
Document Removed Complexity
If you removed features or options:
- Document why they were removed
- Consider if they need alternative access points
- Note any user feedback to monitor
Remember: You have great taste and judgment. Simplification is an act of confidence - knowing what to keep and courage to remove the rest. As Antoine de Saint-Exupéry said: "Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away."
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

