agentleFS
wordbrickswordbricks/onequery/.agents/skills/better-result-adopt/SKILL.md

better-result-adopt

Skill17 starsChanged 7 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Adopt better-result in an existing TypeScript codebase. Use when replacing try/catch, Promise rejection handling, null sentinels, or thrown domain exceptions with typed Result workflows.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

6 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this skill when the user wants to:

    line 14
  2. Very specific:

    Check for an opensrc/ directory.

    line 35
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not convert the whole codebase at once.

    line 50
  4. Very specific:

    Update immediate callers so they handle or propagate the new Result.

    line 125
  5. Distinctive:

    Run tests and add coverage for both success and error paths.

    line 128
  6. Very specific:

    If opensrc/ exists, treat it as the source of truth for implementation details and current API behavior.

    line 153

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

better-result Adopt

Adopt better-result incrementally in existing codebases without rewriting everything at once.

When to Use

Use this skill when the user wants to:

  • migrate from try/catch to Result.try or Result.tryPromise
  • replace nullable return values with typed Result<T, E>
  • define domain-specific TaggedError types
  • refactor nested error handling into andThen chains or Result.gen
  • standardize error handling across a service or module

Reading Order

TaskFiles to Read
Adopt better-result in a moduleThis file
Define or review error typesreferences/tagged-errors.md
Inspect library implementation detailsopensrc/ if present

Prerequisites

Before editing code:

  1. Confirm better-result is already installed in the target project.
  2. Check for an opensrc/ directory. If present, read the package source there for current patterns.
  3. Identify the migration scope first: one file, one module, or one boundary layer.

Migration Strategy

1. Start at boundaries

Begin with I/O boundaries and exception-heavy code:

  • HTTP clients
  • database access
  • file system operations
  • parsing and validation
  • framework adapters

Do not convert the whole codebase at once.

2. Classify existing failures

CategoryExamplesTarget shape
Domain errorsnot found, validation, authTaggedError + Result.err
Infrastructure errorsnetwork, DB, file I/OResult.tryPromise + mapped error
Programmer defectsbad assumptions, null derefleave throwing; defects become Panic inside Result callbacks

3. Migrate in this order

  1. Define error types.
  2. Wrap throwing boundaries with Result.try / Result.tryPromise.
  3. Replace null or boolean sentinel returns with Result.
  4. Refactor call sites to propagate Result values.
  5. Collapse nested branching into andThen, mapError, or Result.gen.

Core Transformations

Try/catch → Result.try

function parseConfig(json: string): Result<Config, ParseError> {
  return Result.try({
    try: () => JSON.parse(json) as Config,
    catch: (cause) => new ParseError({ cause, message: `Parse failed: ${cause}` }),
  });
}

Async throws → Result.tryPromise

async function fetchUser(id: string): Promise<Result<User, ApiError | UnhandledException>> {
  return Result.tryPromise({
    try: async () => {
      const res = await fetch(`/api/users/${id}`);
      if (!res.ok) throw new ApiError({ status: res.status, message: `API ${res.status}` });
      return res.json() as Promise<User>;
    },
    catch: (cause) => (cause instanceof ApiError ? cause : new UnhandledException({ cause })),
  });
}

Null sentinel → Result

function findUser(id: string): Result<User, NotFoundError> {
  const user = users.find((candidate) => candidate.id === id);
  return user
    ? Result.ok(user)
    : Result.err(new NotFoundError({ id, message: `User ${id} not found` }));
}

Nested flow → Result.gen

async function processOrder(orderId: string): Promise<Result<OrderResult, OrderError>> {
  return Result.gen(async function* () {
    const order = yield* Result.await(fetchOrder(orderId));
    const validated = yield* validateOrder(order);
    const result = yield* Result.await(submitOrder(validated));
    return Result.ok(result);
  });
}

Execution Workflow

  1. Audit the target module for try, catch, .catch(...), throw, null, undefined, and status-flag error handling.
  2. Define or update TaggedError classes before changing control flow.
  3. Convert boundary functions first and change their signatures to Result<T, E> or Promise<Result<T, E>>.
  4. Update immediate callers so they handle or propagate the new Result.
  5. Where multiple Result-returning steps compose, use Result.gen or andThen.
  6. Preserve error context by keeping cause, IDs, messages, and other structured fields.
  7. Run tests and add coverage for both success and error paths.

Completion Criteria

A migration is complete when:

  • target functions no longer rely on try/catch for expected domain failures
  • nullable or sentinel error returns are replaced with explicit Result values
  • domain failures use typed TaggedError classes
  • callers either propagate Result or explicitly unwrap/match it
  • tests cover at least one success path and one representative error path

Common Pitfalls

  • Over-wrapping everything instead of starting at boundaries
  • Losing original failure context when mapping errors
  • Mixing throw-based and Result-based APIs deep in the same flow
  • Catching Panic instead of fixing the underlying defect

In This Reference

FilePurpose
references/tagged-errors.mdTaggedError patterns, matching, type guards, and examples

If opensrc/ exists, treat it as the source of truth for implementation details and current API behavior.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.