agentleFS
witi-projectswiti-projects/Skills/recording-browser-flow-as-test/SKILL.md

recording-browser-flow-as-test

Skill2 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub

Execute a user flow step-by-step in Cursor's built-in browser while documenting each action, then emit a Playwright test that replays the same flow using stable selectors derived from the accessibility tree. Use when the user says "/recording-browser-flow-as-test", "recording browser flow as test", or asks about recording browser flow as test.

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  • could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
  1. Distinctive:

    Use the browser MCP as a recorder: every navigation, click, fill, and keypress becomes a row in a script.

    line 9
  2. Very specific:

    After actions that change the DOM or navigate, take a new browser_snapshot before the next interaction.

    line 44
  3. Very specific:

    If the flow must wait for async content, use browser_wait_for or short incremental waits per cursor-ide-browser guidance — then snapshot …

    line 46
  4. Very specific:

    Auth: if the flow needs login, use env vars for test credentials or Playwright storageState — never commit secrets.

    line 74
  5. Distinctive:

    Parallel runs: ensure test data does not collide with other tests.

    line 75

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Recording Browser Flow as Playwright Test

Use the browser MCP as a recorder: every navigation, click, fill, and keypress becomes a row in a script. The agent then translates that trace into a Playwright test file in the repo (or a snippet to paste into an existing spec).

This is Cursor-native because it combines browser_snapshot (refs + roles + names) with structured actions — not a separate recorder extension.

Prerequisites

  • Target app reachable (e.g. dev server running); use finding-dev-server-url if needed.
  • Repo has or will have Playwright installed (@playwright/test). If not, add it with adding-e2e-tests or the project’s standard setup.

Recording workflow

1. Define the flow

One sentence scope, e.g. “Log in, open Settings, toggle dark mode, save.”

2. For each step, in order

  1. browser_snapshot — get the accessibility tree and element refs.
  2. Choose the smallest interaction:
    • browser_click with ref from snapshot (not coordinate clicks unless required).
    • browser_fill or browser_type for inputs.
    • browser_select_option for selects.
    • browser_navigate for full URL changes.
  3. Log the step in a structured list the main agent keeps:

    • Step number
    • Action verb (navigate, click, fill, press, select)
    • Locator strategy for Playwright — prefer:
      • getByRole('button', { name: '...' })
      • getByLabel('...')
      • getByPlaceholder('...')
      • getByTestId('...') if the app uses test IDs
    • Value (for fills), URL (for navigates)
    • Optional: short assertion (“expect URL to contain /settings”)
  4. After actions that change the DOM or navigate, take a new browser_snapshot before the next interaction.
  5. If the flow must wait for async content, use browser_wait_for or short incremental waits per cursor-ide-browser guidance — then snapshot again.

3. Add assertions

From the final snapshot and URL, add at least:

  • expect(page).toHaveURL(...) or URL fragment check
  • One visible outcome: text, role, or test id

4. Generate Playwright output

Emit a test file, e.g. tests/recorded/<flow-name>.spec.ts, containing:

  • test.describe and test('...', async ({ page }) => { ... })
  • Steps as await page.goto(...), await page.getByRole(...).click(), etc.
  • No raw snapshot refs in the final file — they are session-specific.

5. Run and harden

npx playwright test tests/recorded/<flow-name>.spec.ts

Fix flakiness: prefer expect(locator).toBeVisible() before clicks, use toPass() retries for async lists, avoid arbitrary waitForTimeout except as last resort.

Tips

  • Stable selectors: roles and accessible names beat CSS from devtools. Add data-testid in app code if names are ambiguous.
  • Auth: if the flow needs login, use env vars for test credentials or Playwright storageState — never commit secrets.
  • Parallel runs: ensure test data does not collide with other tests.

When not to use

  • Flows that require manual 2FA, captchas, or email links — stop and ask the user for a test bypass or mock.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.