adversarial-review
Skill1 starsChanged 7 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Run a multi-round adversarial code review with two independent AI reviewers that cross-examine each other's findings. Iterates until only nitpicks remain (max 3 rounds). Use when you want deep, debate-style review that catches issues a single pass misses. Triggers on "adversarial review", "debate review", "cross-review", "deep review".
104 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- revisit-studies/studytheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- ozt88/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- selamy-labs/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- kellen-miller/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- leinardi/adversarial-review-looptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- artberri/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use rethink, root-cause-analysis and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
fabioespindulaSkillrethink
Reframe a plan, idea, or decision before the user commits to it. Use when the user asks to rethink, step back, pressure-test, gut-check, decide, right-size, simplify, think bigger about, or evaluate a concrete plan or decision in product, strategy, technical architecture, career, life, company direction, or personal priorities. This skill improves decision quality before action: clarify the real question, challenge assumptions, compare alternatives, calibrate ambition, classify the operating mode, surface risks, and recommend a next move. Do not use for broad future exploration without a concrete decision; that belongs to a think-big or research-style skill.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillroot-cause-analysis
Use when a Regional Retail Manager asks I'm seeing unusual inventory movement at our Northwest stores. Can you help me understand what's happening?
Also in 3 projects that use this
anasahmed07Skillbetter-auth-best-practices
Skill for integrating Better Auth - the comprehensive TypeScript authentication framework.
Also in 4 projects that use this
DockerSkillfix-issue
Fix a single GitHub issue end-to-end: triage, research, write the fix, review, and create a PR. Use when asked to fix an issue: "fix issue 1234", "resolve #500", "create a PR for issue 200".
Also in 3 projects that use this
- MicrosoftSkill
pull-request
Write concise, focused pull request descriptions for Wassette — at most three sentences on the what and why, with an explicit note on any breaking public-API change and how users adapt. Use when opening or editing a Wassette pull request.
Also in 3 projects that use this
juriwiensSkillcodex-review
Run code review via Codex CLI
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +2 more from microsoft
Other versions104 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 104
- PrefectHQ/fastmcp★ 28ksame name
- jlowin/fastmcp★ 28ksame name
- mengxi-ream/read-frog★ 10ksame name
- epicenter-md/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- EpicenterHQ/epicenter★ 4.8ksame name
- basicmachines-co/basic-memory★ 4.5ksame name
- DanMcInerney/architect-loop★ 626same name
- deadlock-mod-manager/deadlock-mod-manager★ 584same name
- boraoztunc/skills★ 454same name
- syahiidkamil/Software-Engineer-AI-Agent-Atlas★ 404same name
94 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- code-principlesSkill
- dispatch-cli-agentSkill
- isolated-db-branchesSkill
- new-issueSkill
- pr-commentsSkill
- readabilitySkill
- review-councilSkill
- shipSkill
- work-logSkill
- workSkill
- write-engineering-lessons-articleSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 93 edited versions we read keep these.
7
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 93 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.