agentleFS
wilbeibiwilbeibi/wilbeibi-skills/skills/show-me/SKILL.md

show-me

Skill2 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Explain code structure, dataflow, or proposed changes with a compact tree, pseudocode, type signature, diff, or diagram. Use when a visual clarifies those relationships; whole-repo briefings belong to grok-repo.

79 other projects use a version of this, 44 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use maintain-formal-verification-skill, create-formal-verification-skill and 8 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • TheOnlyFusionCubeSkill

    maintain-formal-verification-skill

    Bring a project's formal verification back in line with the code after the code changes: find the commits that touched verified code, update the model, harness, or properties to describe the code as it is now, rerun, and say whether each failure is drift in the verification or a bug in the code. Use for /maintain-formal-verification-skill, \"is the model still true to the code\", or after merges and refactors that touched verified code without rechecking it.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • TheOnlyFusionCubeSkill

    create-formal-verification-skill

    Generate a project-local skill that formally verifies the code where a bug costs the most and tests reach the least, in any language, with whichever verification tool fits. Use for /create-formal-verification-skill, \"model-check this race\", \"prove this invariant\", or when concurrency, retries, state machines, parsers, or unsafe code need more than tests.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    eli5

    Explain a topic like I'm a 5 year old. Use when the user types /eli5 <topic> or asks for a dead-simple picture explainer of how something works.

    Also in 10 projects that use this

  • drafaelSkill

    in-your-own-words

    Restate the user's goals and the problem they are trying to solve to check understanding. Manual invocation only; use when the user explicitly invokes in-your-own-words or requests this understanding check. Do not solve the task or rewrite the assistant's last answer.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • jaydubya818Skill

    maintain-verification-skill

    Use when a project's verification driver or feature map may be stale.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • arkanSkill

    break-ui

    Try to break a piece of UI by feeding it worst-case data — long names, unbreakable emails, one-letter names, missing fields, huge counts, zero items, long labels, non-Latin text, emoji, extreme numbers — then render it behind a "Demo data / Worst case" toggle and report everything that broke, with the fix for each. Use when the user asks to stress-test, break, or find edge cases in a component or screen, or to "try the worst case". For visual design critique use emil-design-eng; for motion use review-animations.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +1 more from TheOnlyFusionCube

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 73 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use trees, pseudocode, or diffs in plain terminals.

    line 26
  2. Distinctive:

    Use an interactive visualization or self-contained HTML when interaction or spatial layout adds value.

    line 27
  3. Distinctive:

    Follow the host's output-directory convention and return a link.

    line 28
  4. Distinctive:

    Call tree — runtime order:

    line 33

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 73 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

show-me

Pick the smallest view that makes the point, set it beside one or two lines of text, stop. One view per question; two if a second genuinely adds an axis. Never all of them.

Pick the view

The question is aboutShow
an algorithm, branching, an invariantpseudocode
runtime order, who calls whomcall tree
UI structure, state ownershipcomponent tree — JSX plus the hooks and module paths that matter
where code lives, refactor scopeshallow file tree, one-line responsibility per entry
interaction across processes or timeMermaid sequenceDiagram / stateDiagram
the shape of an API before writing ittype signatures only, no bodies
a change to any of the abovethat same view, as a diff
a layout, or a comparison too dense for the aboveone self-contained HTML file

Render target decides the format

  • Use trees, pseudocode, or diffs in plain terminals. Use Mermaid when the actual destination renders it.
  • Use an interactive visualization or self-contained HTML when interaction or spatial layout adds value. Follow the host's output-directory convention and return a link. Open the file only when requested, using the available platform mechanism; do not assume macOS or a graphical session.

Examples

Call tree — runtime order:

submitForm
  createSession
    persistPrompt
    launchAgent
  navigateToSession

Component tree — structure, state, and the module a component comes from:

<SessionPage> (apps/example/src/routes/session.tsx)
  useSessionEvents()
  <SessionToolbar>
    <RunSkillButton> (packages/ui)

File tree — responsibility, one line each:

src/
├── commands/       # parses user actions
├── sessions/       # owns session state
└── transport/      # sends API requests

Diff — when the surrounding shape already exists. Diff whichever view fits the topic; any of the above takes diff markers. Here, pseudocode:

 on(save)
-  write content
+  if content is unchanged
+    return cached result
+  write new content
+  invalidate cache

Rules

  • Include only the calls, files, props, states, and boundaries this question needs. Elide the rest with …. Do not pad a view toward completeness.
  • Real paths, real names, real data. A tidy diagram with invented labels is worse than prose.
  • Show the whole block instead of a diff when most of it is new, when the omitted context hides ownership or order, or when the user needs something copyable.
  • Skip the preamble. The visual is the answer; the prose is a caption.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.