paper-review-skills
Skill298 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
8 peer review skills. Trigger: reviewing manuscripts, comparing papers, quality assessment. Design: systematic review criteria, evaluation rubrics, and automated review tools.
In this repository39 other files it gives its agents.
- dataviz-skillsSkill
- econometrics-skillsSkill
- statistics-skillsSkill
- wrangling-skillsSkill
- ai-ml-skillsSkill
- biomedical-skillsSkill
- business-skillsSkill
- chemistry-skillsSkill
- cs-skillsSkill
- ecology-skillsSkill
- economics-skillsSkill
- education-skillsSkill
- finance-skillsSkill
- geoscience-skillsSkill
- humanities-skillsSkill
- law-skillsSkill
- math-skillsSkill
- pharma-skillsSkill
- physics-skillsSkill
- social-science-skillsSkill
- discovery-skillsSkill
- fulltext-skillsSkill
- metadata-skillsSkill
- search-skillsSkill
- automation-skillsSkill
- deep-research-skillsSkill
- funding-skillsSkill
- methodology-skillsSkill
- code-exec-skillsSkill
- diagram-skillsSkill
- document-skillsSkill
- knowledge-graph-skillsSkill
- ocr-translate-skillsSkill
- scraping-skillsSkill
- citation-skillsSkill
- composition-skillsSkill
- latex-skillsSkill
- polish-skillsSkill
- templates-skillsSkill
The file
Files
Peer Review — 8 Skills
Select the skill matching the user's need, then read its SKILL.md.
| Skill | Description |
| automated-review-guide | AI-assisted peer review tools, workflows, and quality standards |
| latte-review-guide | Automate systematic literature reviews with LatteReview AI agents |
| paper-critique-framework | Structured framework for writing peer review reports and paper critiques |
| paper-reading-assistant | AI-assisted paper reading, PDF Q&A, and summarization workflows |
| peer-review-guide | Conduct thorough, constructive peer reviews and evaluate research papers |
| rebuttal-writing-guide | Write effective rebuttals to reviewer comments for journal submissions |
| review-response-guide | Craft effective point-by-point reviewer response letters |
| scientify-write-review-paper | Write literature reviews and survey papers from collected papers |
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.