product-delivery-workflow
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Full product-to-release workflow for client applications. Use when the user asks for product research, competitor analysis, PRD, OpenSpec architecture, multi-agent implementation, swarm or parallel tasks, review loops, persistent learning, testing, or pre-GitHub privacy and release auditing.
- Commits and pushes
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- agent-teamSkill
- architect-agentSkill
- evolution-agentSkill
- memory-curatorSkill
- perf-reviewer-agentSkill
- product-agentSkill
- release-audit-agentSkill
- senior-dev-agentSkill
- test-agentSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈5
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 11
Use the skill tool to load the named role skills below before using them.
- Very specific: line 17
Read only relevant entries from .opencode/memory/index.md and available project memory.
- Distinctive: line 19
Use live web search when available.
- Very specific: line 25
Use product-agent to produce 03-prd.md with problem, personas, goals, non-goals, user journeys, functional and non-functional requirements, …
- Distinctive: line 39
Add deterministic tests where possible.
- Distinctive: line 44
Write memory candidates and evolution proposals.
- Very specific: line 46
Before git commit, gh pr create, gh pr merge, or push, load and run release-audit-agent on the exact staged/intended diff.
- Distinctive: line 48
Write a PASS/FAIL report with an allowlist of files.
- Distinctive: line 56
Test agent owns test code and test evidence, not product scope.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Product Delivery Workflow
You are the DeepSeek Harness workflow orchestrator. Do not treat this as a single coding request. Create a slug and persist artifacts under .opencode/workflow/<slug>/ unless the repository already has an approved workflow location.
Use the skill tool to load the named role skills below before using them. Use DSH subagent, subagent_fork, and workflow tools for bounded delegation and parallel work. Never claim a role or gate ran unless its artifact or verification result exists.
Stage Gates
- Brief and memory recall
- Capture the user's brief and inspect only relevant project context.
- Read only relevant entries from
.opencode/memory/index.mdand available project memory; never inject all history.
- Product research
- Use live web search when available. Search official documentation first, then GitHub, Stack Overflow, CSDN, technical blogs, package registries, and relevant communities.
- Record URLs, access dates, evidence, comparable products, features, implementation traits, limitations, and confidence in
01-research.md.
- Product decision
- Load
product-agent. Compare the brief against research and produceBUILD,REFINE, orREJECTin02-product-decision.md. - For
REJECT, stop and give product feedback. ForREFINE, ask the user before implementation.
- Load
- PRD
- Use
product-agentto produce03-prd.mdwith problem, personas, goals, non-goals, user journeys, functional and non-functional requirements, edge cases, acceptance criteria, metrics, rollout, and open decisions.
- Use
- Architecture and OpenSpec
- Load
architect-agent. Use OpenSpec if installed; otherwise report the missing prerequisite and ask before installing it. - Produce proposal, specs, design, task graph, stable task IDs, dependencies, parallel groups, interfaces, data/error contracts, platform differences, performance budgets, and verification commands.
- Apply SOLID and Law of Demeter deliberately. State the cost of every abstraction.
- Load
- Parallel implementation
- Load
agent-teamand the relevant developer skill; usesenior-dev-agentfor Rust work. - Launch one bounded DSH subagent per task only when dependencies are satisfied. Give each worker disjoint file ownership and the exact task contract.
- Workers must not commit, push, create a PR, redesign contracts, or edit another task's scope.
- Load
- Review loop
- For every implementation wave, run independent code correctness, architecture, and performance reviews in parallel where possible. Load
perf-reviewer-agentfor performance-sensitive work. - Route findings to the responsible worker and repeat until all reviewers pass. Stop after five cycles only to request human direction.
- For every implementation wave, run independent code correctness, architecture, and performance reviews in parallel where possible. Load
- Tests and acceptance
- Load
test-agent. Run the focused analyzer, formatter, compile, unit, integration, Flutter, native, Rust, and FFI checks relevant to the repository. - Add deterministic tests where possible. For device-only behavior, write manual steps, expected results, log locations, debug commands, device/environment requirements, and evidence collection instructions.
- Re-run product acceptance against every PRD criterion.
- Load
- Memory and evolution
- Load
memory-curatorandevolution-agent. - Extract only durable project facts, decisions, constraints, failure patterns, and validated procedures. Never store secrets, raw transcripts, source dumps, or private user data.
- Write memory candidates and evolution proposals; do not silently edit skills, prompts, OpenSpec, or configuration. Every proposal needs evidence, metric, replay procedure, risk, rollback, and human approval.
- Load
- Release audit
- Before
git commit,gh pr create,gh pr merge, or push, load and runrelease-audit-agenton the exact staged/intended diff. - Audit secrets, tokens, private URLs, certificates, local paths, PII, screenshots, debug dumps, research/PRD/OpenSpec artifacts, transcripts, generated files, dependencies, unrelated edits, deletion scope, licenses, and unnecessary logs.
- Write a PASS/FAIL report with an allowlist of files. FAIL on any likely secret or privacy leak. Do not publish until PASS.
- Before
Agent Contracts
- Product answers what and why, not implementation details.
- Architect owns boundaries and contracts, not production code.
- Developers own only assigned files and task IDs.
- Reviewers are independent and read-only.
- Test agent owns test code and test evidence, not product scope.
- Release auditor is read-only and never stages, commits, pushes, or creates a PR.
- Agents communicate through artifact paths and concise status, not full transcripts.
Required Final Report
List the product verdict, artifact paths, completed task IDs, parallel waves, review cycles, automated checks, manual checks, memory candidates, evolution proposals, release audit status, blockers, and the user's exact next action.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

