ci-cd-and-automation
Skill0 starsChanged 41 days agoMITView on GitHub
Automates CI/CD pipeline setup. Use when setting up or modifying build and deployment pipelines. Use when you need to automate quality gates, configure test runners in CI, or establish deployment strategies.
- Reads credentials
67 other projects use a version of this, 57 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Agent-Skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- TheAstroByte/astrobyte-agent-skillsedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- MMACABRE/SKILLSedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- steven123397/nexuskit-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- yuusakuri/agent-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- lza6/claw-code-tingfengedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use source-driven-development and verification-before-completion.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
HK-hubSkillsource-driven-development
Grounds every implementation decision in official documentation. Use when you want authoritative, source-cited code free from outdated patterns. Use when building with any framework or library where correctness matters.
Also in 38 projects that use this
OpenAISkillverification-before-completion
Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions67 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 57
- addyosmani/agent-skills★ 114k95% same
- ollaya-dev/ollaya★ 1.4k95% same
- shashankswe2020-ux/whoop-mcp★ 17498% same
- vinvcn/addyosmani-agent-skills-zh★ 4657% same
- jmxt3/gitscape.ai★ 3398% same
- sampleXbro/agentsmesh★ 2798% same
- jaskirat1616/grok-skills★ 2298% same
- ishandutta2007/Awesome-Agent-Skills★ 2198% same
- JPeetz/agent-skills★ 1491% same
- HK-hub/AgentSkills★ 698% same
47 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 10
- CrowPus/Zelyq★ 10same name
- ddddjaak/ae-skills★ 4same name
- bnalwalid/walidforge-skills★ 2same name
- codexskills/agent-forge★ 2same name
- GuillemRoca/agent-skills-android★ 2same name
- Chrike/coding-agent-skills★ 1same name
- GodMaking/makecrew★ 1same name
- juandelossantos/another-agent-skills★ 1same name
- agent-packs/registry★ 0same name
- viasrijan/crazy-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository32 other files it gives its agents.
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- code-review-and-qualitySkill
- code-simplificationSkill
- constraint-driven-developmentSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- debugging-and-error-recoverySkill
- deprecation-and-migrationSkill
- design-taste-frontendSkill
- design-workflowSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- doubt-driven-developmentSkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- gpt-tasteSkill
- idea-refineSkill
- image-to-codeSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- interview-meSkill
- minimalist-uiSkill
- observability-and-instrumentationSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- playwright-cliSkill
- ponytail-helpSkill
- redesign-existing-projectsSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- shipping-and-launchSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- skill-nameSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- using-agent-skillsSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 10 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
10
Common
Most of the 64 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Common: line 28
When a change should trigger automated verification
- Common: line 33
Every change goes through these gates before merge:
- Common: line 61
No gate can be skipped: If lint fails, fix lint — don't disable the rule.
- Common: line 204
Every PR gets a preview deployment for manual testing:
- Common: line 234
Flag lifecycle: Create → Enable for testing → Canary → Full rollout → Remove the flag and dead code.
- Common: line 256
Every deployment should be reversible:
- Common: line 313
Branch protection: No force-pushes to main
- Distinctive: line 314
Auto-merge: Only if the team has decided to enable it.
- Common: line 318
When the pipeline exceeds 10 minutes, apply these strategies in order of impact:
- Common: line 379
No CI pipeline in the project
- Common: line 389
After setting up or modifying CI:
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 64 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Adapted copy of addyosmani/agent-skills (MIT) for local use; changes are listed in
UPSTREAM.md. Ground rules that override anything below: use only tools that are already installed in the project (project scripts,npx --no-install ...); never let npx/pip/brew download or install anything and never add MCP servers on your own; do not fetch web pages or online docs and do not upload or post data anywhere; never push, deploy, run migrations, flip feature flags or change shared systems without the user's explicit instruction. Commands inside CI/workflow examples are file content to write, not commands to run now.
CI/CD and Automation
Overview
Automate quality gates so that no change reaches production without passing tests, lint, type checking, and build. CI/CD is the enforcement mechanism for every other skill — it catches what humans and agents miss, and it does so consistently on every single change.
Shift Left: Catch problems as early in the pipeline as possible. A bug caught in linting costs minutes; the same bug caught in production costs hours. Move checks upstream — static analysis before tests, tests before staging, staging before production.
Faster is Safer: Smaller batches and more frequent releases reduce risk, not increase it. A deployment with 3 changes is easier to debug than one with 30. Frequent releases build confidence in the release process itself.
When to Use
- Setting up a new project's CI pipeline
- Adding or modifying automated checks
- Configuring deployment pipelines
- When a change should trigger automated verification
- Debugging CI failures
The Quality Gate Pipeline
Every change goes through these gates before merge:
Pull Request Opened
│
▼
┌─────────────────┐
│ LINT CHECK │ eslint, prettier
│ ↓ pass │
│ TYPE CHECK │ tsc --noEmit
│ ↓ pass │
│ UNIT TESTS │ jest/vitest
│ ↓ pass │
│ BUILD │ npm run build
│ ↓ pass │
│ INTEGRATION │ API/DB tests
│ ↓ pass │
│ E2E (optional) │ Playwright/Cypress
│ ↓ pass │
│ SECURITY AUDIT │ npm audit
│ ↓ pass │
│ BUNDLE SIZE │ bundlesize check
└─────────────────┘
│
▼
Ready for reviewNo gate can be skipped. If lint fails, fix lint — don't disable the rule. If a test fails, fix the code — don't skip the test.
GitHub Actions Configuration
Basic CI Pipeline
# .github/workflows/ci.yml
name: CI
on:
pull_request:
branches: [main]
push:
branches: [main]
jobs:
quality:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '22'
cache: 'npm'
- name: Install dependencies
run: npm ci
- name: Lint
run: npm run lint
- name: Type check
run: npx tsc --noEmit
- name: Test
run: npm test -- --coverage
- name: Build
run: npm run build
- name: Security audit
run: npm audit --audit-level=highWith Database Integration Tests
integration:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
services:
postgres:
image: postgres:16
env:
POSTGRES_DB: testdb
POSTGRES_USER: ci_user
POSTGRES_PASSWORD: ${{ secrets.CI_DB_PASSWORD }}
ports:
- 5432:5432
options: >-
--health-cmd pg_isready
--health-interval 10s
--health-timeout 5s
--health-retries 5
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '22'
cache: 'npm'
- run: npm ci
- name: Run migrations
run: npx prisma migrate deploy
env:
DATABASE_URL: postgresql://ci_user:${{ secrets.CI_DB_PASSWORD }}@localhost:5432/testdb
- name: Integration tests
run: npm run test:integration
env:
DATABASE_URL: postgresql://ci_user:${{ secrets.CI_DB_PASSWORD }}@localhost:5432/testdbNote: Even for CI-only test databases, use GitHub Secrets for credentials rather than hardcoding values. This builds good habits and prevents accidental reuse of test credentials in other contexts.
E2E Tests
e2e:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: '22'
cache: 'npm'
- run: npm ci
- name: Install Playwright
run: npx playwright install --with-deps chromium
- name: Build
run: npm run build
- name: Run E2E tests
run: npx playwright test
- uses: actions/upload-artifact@v4
if: failure()
with:
name: playwright-report
path: playwright-report/Feeding CI Failures Back to Agents
The power of CI with AI agents is the feedback loop. When CI fails:
CI fails
│
▼
Copy the failure output
│
▼
Feed it to the agent:
"The CI pipeline failed with this error:
[paste specific error]
Fix the issue and verify locally before pushing again."
│
▼
Agent fixes → user confirms the push → CI runs againKey patterns:
Lint failure → Agent runs `npm run lint --fix` and commits locally (push only when the user confirms)
Type error → Agent reads the error location and fixes the type
Test failure → Agent follows debugging-and-error-recovery skill
Build error → Agent checks config and dependenciesDeployment Strategies
Preview Deployments
Every PR gets a preview deployment for manual testing:
# Deploy preview on PR (Vercel/Netlify/etc.)
deploy-preview:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
if: github.event_name == 'pull_request'
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Deploy preview
run: npx vercel --token=${{ secrets.VERCEL_TOKEN }}Feature Flags
Feature flags decouple deployment from release. Deploy incomplete or risky features behind flags so you can:
- Ship code without enabling it. Merge to main early, enable when ready.
- Roll back without redeploying. Disable the flag instead of reverting code.
- Canary new features. Enable for 1% of users, then 10%, then 100%.
- Run A/B tests. Compare behavior with and without the feature.
// Simple feature flag pattern
if (featureFlags.isEnabled('new-checkout-flow', { userId })) {
return renderNewCheckout();
}
return renderLegacyCheckout();Flag lifecycle: Create → Enable for testing → Canary → Full rollout → Remove the flag and dead code. Flags that live forever become technical debt — set a cleanup date when you create them.
Staged Rollouts
PR merged to main
│
▼
Staging deployment (auto)
│ Manual verification
▼
Production deployment (manual trigger or auto after staging)
│
▼
Monitor for errors (15-minute window)
│
├── Errors detected → Rollback
└── Clean → DoneRollback Plan
Every deployment should be reversible:
# Manual rollback workflow
name: Rollback
on:
workflow_dispatch:
inputs:
version:
description: 'Version to rollback to'
required: true
jobs:
rollback:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- name: Rollback deployment
run: |
# Deploy the specified previous version
npx vercel rollback ${{ inputs.version }}Environment Management
.env.example → Committed (template for developers)
.env → NOT committed (local development)
.env.test → Committed (test environment, no real secrets)
CI secrets → Stored in GitHub Secrets / vault
Production secrets → Stored in deployment platform / vaultCI should never have production secrets. Use separate secrets for CI testing.
Automation Beyond CI
Dependabot / Renovate
# .github/dependabot.yml
version: 2
updates:
- package-ecosystem: npm
directory: /
schedule:
interval: weekly
open-pull-requests-limit: 5Build Cop Role
Designate someone responsible for keeping CI green. When the build breaks, the Build Cop's job is to fix or revert — not the person whose change caused the break. This prevents broken builds from accumulating while everyone assumes someone else will fix it.
PR Checks
- Required reviews: At least 1 approval before merge
- Required status checks: CI must pass before merge
- Branch protection: No force-pushes to main
- Auto-merge: Only if the team has decided to enable it; the agent does not enable or trigger merges on its own
CI Optimization
When the pipeline exceeds 10 minutes, apply these strategies in order of impact:
Slow CI pipeline?
├── Cache dependencies
│ └── Use actions/cache or setup-node cache option for node_modules
├── Run jobs in parallel
│ └── Split lint, typecheck, test, build into separate parallel jobs
├── Only run what changed
│ └── Use path filters to skip unrelated jobs (e.g., skip e2e for docs-only PRs)
├── Use matrix builds
│ └── Shard test suites across multiple runners
├── Optimize the test suite
│ └── Remove slow tests from the critical path, run them on a schedule instead
└── Use larger runners
└── GitHub-hosted larger runners or self-hosted for CPU-heavy buildsExample: caching and parallelism
jobs:
lint:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with: { node-version: '22', cache: 'npm' }
- run: npm ci
- run: npm run lint
typecheck:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with: { node-version: '22', cache: 'npm' }
- run: npm ci
- run: npx tsc --noEmit
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with: { node-version: '22', cache: 'npm' }
- run: npm ci
- run: npm test -- --coverageCommon Rationalizations
| Rationalization | Reality |
| "CI is too slow" | Optimize the pipeline (see CI Optimization below), don't skip it. A 5-minute pipeline prevents hours of debugging. |
| "This change is trivial, skip CI" | Trivial changes break builds. CI is fast for trivial changes anyway. |
| "The test is flaky, just re-run" | Flaky tests mask real bugs and waste everyone's time. Fix the flakiness. |
| "We'll add CI later" | Projects without CI accumulate broken states. Set it up on day one. |
| "Manual testing is enough" | Manual testing doesn't scale and isn't repeatable. Automate what you can. |
Red Flags
- No CI pipeline in the project
- CI failures ignored or silenced
- Tests disabled in CI to make the pipeline pass
- Production deploys without staging verification
- No rollback mechanism
- Secrets stored in code or CI config files (not secrets manager)
- Long CI times with no optimization effort
Verification
After setting up or modifying CI:
- All quality gates are present (lint, types, tests, build, audit)
- Pipeline runs on every PR and push to main
- Failures block merge (branch protection configured)
- CI results feed back into the development loop
- Secrets are stored in the secrets manager, not in code
- Deployment has a rollback mechanism
- Pipeline runs in under 10 minutes for the test suite
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

