agentleFS
Sign inStart free
wamalalawrencewamalalawrence/agent-skills/skills/software-engineer/SKILL.md

software-engineer

Skill0 starsChanged 50 days agoLicence not identifiedView on GitHub

Senior-level pair-programming workflow for software engineering work. Use when: making code changes, bug fixes, refactors, feature implementation, issue-description driven fixes, code review, PR preparation, migration scripts, API changes, or security review. Connects implementation, review, and issue resolution in one context-aware loop. Uses compact project and issue context first, then expands only when risk or ambiguity requires it. Invokes the nested code-reviewer skill at the end of Implementation and again at the end of QA, and auto-iterates the engineer↔reviewer pair-programming loop (address findings, re-invoke reviewer, repeat until convergence or `${CODE_REVIEWER_MAX_ROUNDS}`) instead of bouncing each round back to the user. Reuses issue-investigator when issue context, root cause, or expected behavior needs deeper evidence.

  • Reads credentials
  • Deletes or force-pushes
  • Commits and pushes

12 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use software-architect.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • u1pnsSkill

    software-architect

    Acts as a CTO and Senior Software Architect. Use this skill when the user needs a technical architecture, database schema, API design, or stack selection. Triggers: 'system design', 'tech spec', 'choose stack', 'database model', 'API structure', 'security architecture'.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

73 rules. 0 are common, 41 are distinctive, and 32 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 41

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 32

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

The licence could not be identified — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

Check your setup, free