workflow-orchestration
Skill115 starsChanged 7 months agoMITView on GitHub
Disciplined task execution with planning, verification, and self-improvement loops. Use when starting non-trivial tasks (3+ steps), fixing bugs, building features, refactoring code, or when rigorous execution with quality gates is needed. Includes subagent delegation, lessons tracking, and staff-engineer-level verification.
11 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-configtheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- Muhammad-Tariq/webgis-claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
- BrendenKennedy/claude-for-ai-platformstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- AnastasiyaW/claude-code-configtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- lxy3837/MultiCoopAgentSystemtheir own version, first seen Jul 13, 2026
- zavora-ai/skill-workflow-orchestrationtheir own version, first seen May 31, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ui-ux-pro-max.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
StrayDragonSkillui-ux-pro-max
UI/UX design intelligence. 50 styles, 21 palettes, 50 font pairings, 20 charts, 8 stacks (React, Next.js, Vue, Svelte, SwiftUI, React Native, Flutter, Tailwind). Actions: plan, build, create, design, implement, review, fix, improve, optimize, enhance, refactor, check UI/UX code. Projects: website, landing page, dashboard, admin panel, e-commerce, SaaS, portfolio, blog, mobile app, .html, .tsx, .vue, .svelte. Elements: button, modal, navbar, sidebar, card, table, form, chart. Styles: glassmorphism, claymorphism, minimalism, brutalism, neumorphism, bento grid, dark mode, responsive, skeuomorphism, flat design. Topics: color palette, accessibility, animation, layout, typography, font pairing, spacing, hover, shadow, gradient.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- IwuchukwuDivine/skill-registry★ 291% same
- dnh33/workflow-orchestration★ 033% same
Wrote their own version · 9
- AnastasiyaW/claude-code-config★ 214same name
- AnastasiyaW/codex-claude-code-config★ 214same name
- clasen/Skills★ 40same name
- CarbeneAI/Forge★ 9same name
- shyamsridhar123/oneshot★ 4same name
- lxy3837/MultiCoopAgentSystem★ 3same name
- BrendenKennedy/claude-for-ai-platforms★ 1same name
- Muhammad-Tariq/webgis-claude-skills★ 1same name
- zavora-ai/skill-workflow-orchestration★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
20 rules. 0 are common, 16 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 8 edited versions we read keep these.
16
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 31
If something goes sideways, STOP and re-plan immediately
- Distinctive: line 32
Use plan mode for verification steps, not just building
- Distinctive: line 33
Write detailed specs upfront to reduce ambiguity
- Distinctive: line 37
Keep the main context window clean:
- Distinctive: line 54
After ANY correction from the user:
- Very specific: line 56
Update tasks/lessons.md with the pattern
- Distinctive: line 57
Write rules that prevent the same mistake
- Distinctive: line 72
Never mark a task complete without proving it works
- Distinctive: line 74
Ask yourself: "Would a staff engineer approve this?"
- Distinctive: line 75
Run tests, check logs, demonstrate corrections
- Distinctive: line 76
If verification fails → return to the plan step and revise before retrying
- Distinctive: line 81
If a fix feels hacky: "Knowing everything I know now, implement the elegant solution"
- Distinctive: line 86
When given a bug report: Just fix it.
- Very specific: line 92
Plan First: Write plan to tasks/todo.md with checkable items
- Distinctive: line 93
Verify Plan: Check in before starting implementation
- Distinctive: line 96
Verify Results: Run tests and confirm behavior before marking done
- Distinctive: line 97
Handle Failures: If verification fails → re-plan (step 1), don't push through
- Very specific: line 98
Document Results: Add review to tasks/todo.md
- Very specific: line 99
Capture Lessons: Update tasks/lessons.md after corrections
- Distinctive: line 116
Minimal Impact: Only touch what's necessary.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 8 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Workflow Orchestration
Apply these practices for disciplined, high-quality task execution.
Quick Reference
| Practice | When to Apply |
| Plan Mode | Any task with 3+ steps or architectural decisions |
| Subagents | Research, exploration, parallel analysis |
| Lessons | After ANY user correction |
| Verification | Before marking any task complete |
| Elegance Check | Non-trivial changes only |
1. Plan Mode Default
- Enter plan mode for ANY non-trivial task (3+ steps or architectural decisions)
- If something goes sideways, STOP and re-plan immediately
- Use plan mode for verification steps, not just building
- Write detailed specs upfront to reduce ambiguity
2. Subagent Strategy
Keep the main context window clean:
- Offload research, exploration, and parallel analysis to subagents
- For complex problems, throw more compute at it via subagents
- One task per subagent for focused execution
Template:
Agent({
description: "Search auth patterns",
prompt: "Find all authentication middleware in src/ and list file paths with a one-line summary of each."
})3. Self-Improvement Loop
After ANY correction from the user:
- Update
tasks/lessons.mdwith the pattern - Write rules that prevent the same mistake
- Review lessons at session start
Inline example (full template in references/lessons-format.md):
## 2024-01-10 - Testing
**Mistake**: Mocks hid real API behavior; production broke
**Pattern**: Over-mocking created false confidence
**Rule**: Include at least one integration test hitting real services
**Applied**: All API endpoints, external service integrations4. Verification Before Done
- Never mark a task complete without proving it works
- Diff behavior between main and your changes when relevant
- Ask yourself: "Would a staff engineer approve this?"
- Run tests, check logs, demonstrate corrections
- If verification fails → return to the plan step and revise before retrying
5. Demand Elegance (Balanced)
- For non-trivial changes: pause and ask "is there a more elegant way?"
- If a fix feels hacky: "Knowing everything I know now, implement the elegant solution"
- Skip this for simple, obvious fixes—don't over-engineer
6. Autonomous Bug Fixing
- When given a bug report: Just fix it. Don't ask for hand-holding
- Point at logs, errors, failing tests—then resolve them
- Zero context switching required from the user
Task Management Protocol
- Plan First: Write plan to
tasks/todo.mdwith checkable items - Verify Plan: Check in before starting implementation
- Track Progress: Mark items complete as you go
- Explain Changes: High-level summary at each step
- Verify Results: Run tests and confirm behavior before marking done
- Handle Failures: If verification fails → re-plan (step 1), don't push through
- Document Results: Add review to
tasks/todo.md - Capture Lessons: Update
tasks/lessons.mdafter corrections
Inline example (full templates in references/task-templates.md):
# Task: Fix memory leak in WebSocket handler
## Plan
- [ ] Reproduce the issue locally
- [ ] Identify leak source with profiler
- [ ] Implement fix
- [ ] Verification: Memory stable over 1000 connectionsCore Principles
- Simplicity First: Make every change as simple as possible
- No Laziness: Find root causes. No temporary fixes. Senior developer standards
- Minimal Impact: Only touch what's necessary. Avoid introducing bugs
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

