agentleFS
vstorm-covstorm-co/agenticos/.claude/skills/agent-spec/SKILL.md

agent-spec

Skill241 starsChanged 30 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Change the agent spec — add or remove a field, rename one, tighten a rule, bump SPEC_VERSION, change publish-time validation, or touch YAML export/import. Use whenever editing app/agents/spec.py or anything that reads a stored spec. Every published agent and every client git repository holds a copy of this format, so a change that only works forwards breaks agents nobody touched.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    If you narrow anything in a spec field, the same applies: find every stored value first, and migrate it in the same change.

    line 50

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

The agent spec — the format you cannot break

app/agents/spec.py. Reference page: docs/reference/spec.md (generated from the docstrings, so the reasoning belongs in the docstring). Concepts: docs/concepts.md.

The most load-bearing type in the platform: the Builder edits it, the database versions it, the factory instantiates it, and clients export it as YAML into their own git repositories.

The constraint

Old specs must keep loading. A published agent's spec is stored as it was written. A change that only parses new documents is a 500 on every run of something nobody touched.

model_config = ConfigDict(extra="forbid") means an unknown key is a hard error, so this is not theoretical. SPEC_VERSION is currently 14.

What each change costs

ChangeCost
Add an optional field with a defaultFree. Old specs take the default
Add a required fieldNot allowed. Give it a default, or a mode="before" validator that supplies one
Rename a fieldA mode="before" validator that moves the old key. CapabilityBindingSpec._fold_the_knowledge_capabilitys_own_rename is the worked example
Remove a fieldDrop it in a mode="before" validator and log a warning — never let extra="forbid" raise on a stored spec. See _MODEL_SETTINGS_WITHDRAWN
Narrow a rule (shorter max, tighter pattern, new enum)The dangerous one — see below
Move behaviour to a capabilityFold the old value into a binding, don't just drop it. _with_thinking_binding is the pattern

Bump SPEC_VERSION whenever a stored document needs migrating, and write the migration in the same change.

Narrowing a rule is a data migration

A narrower rule does not only reject new input — it makes existing rows unreadable, and a Pydantic model that refuses to validate one field of one row takes down the whole listing endpoint with a 500.

IngestionConfig and its OCR language codes are the worked example outside the spec: ocr_language went from "anything 2–16 characters" to Tesseract's ^[a-z]{3}(\+[a-z]{3})*$, and every row written before it held "en". The data migration shipped in the same revision.

If you narrow anything in a spec field, the same applies: find every stored value first, and migrate it in the same change.

Two invariants a migration must preserve

Idempotence. An explicitly-set value wins over a migrated one, so re-reading a spec the validator already migrated changes nothing. Both existing validators are written this way; keep it.

Refusal at publish, never at run time. An unknown capability id, an ungranted scope, a tool_approval keyed on a tool that does not exist, an unrenderable tool name, a secret_id of the wrong kind or from another organization, a personal MCP connection — all refused while somebody is looking at a form. Validation added to the runner instead is a broken agent in production rather than a red field in the Builder.

app/services/agent_registry.py owns publish validation. _tool_override_problems is the shape to copy: collect every problem and report them together.

What the spec deliberately excludes

Anything about where it runs (surfaces, channels, exposures) and who may use it (owner, sharing). Those are deployment and access facts; keeping them out is what lets the same spec be exported, reviewed and reused across organizations.

It also carries no secret values — only secret_id references. A spec goes into a client's git repository.

YAML

to_yaml keeps spec order rather than sorting, so a diff reflects what changed rather than where it happens to sort, and UUIDs become strings so the file round-trips through any reader. from_yaml raises ValueError on a non-mapping document, because a list or a bare string reaches Pydantic as an unhelpful type error.

Round-trip is part of the contract: spec == AgentSpec.from_yaml(spec.to_yaml()).

Test

tests/test_agent_spec_and_factory.py. Every migration needs a test that loads a verbatim old document — not one built from the current model, which cannot fail. Plus the round-trip, the duplicate-capability refusal, and each publish refusal.

app/agents/** is held to 100%. See the backend-tests skill.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.