agent-spec
Skill241 starsChanged 30 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Change the agent spec — add or remove a field, rename one, tighten a rule, bump SPEC_VERSION, change publish-time validation, or touch YAML export/import. Use whenever editing app/agents/spec.py or anything that reads a stored spec. Every published agent and every client git repository holds a copy of this format, so a change that only works forwards breaks agents nobody touched.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vhmarquez/argotheir own version, first seen Oct 15, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- vhmarquez/argo★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository22 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- frontend/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- llms.txtllms.txt
- agent-capabilitySkill
- alembic-migrationSkill
- backend-testsSkill
- background-taskSkill
- channel-botSkill
- dev-agentSkill
- e2e-testsSkill
- frontend-featureSkill
- mcp-connectionsSkill
- permissions-rbacSkill
- pr-commentsSkill
- pr-descriptionSkill
- project-docsSkill
- rag-knowledgeSkill
- resolve-changelog-conflictSkill
- review-mapSkill
- ste-writingSkill
- vault-secretsSkill
- vstorm-code-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 50
If you narrow anything in a spec field, the same applies: find every stored value first, and migrate it in the same change.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
The agent spec — the format you cannot break
app/agents/spec.py. Reference page: docs/reference/spec.md (generated from the
docstrings, so the reasoning belongs in the docstring). Concepts:
docs/concepts.md.
The most load-bearing type in the platform: the Builder edits it, the database versions it, the factory instantiates it, and clients export it as YAML into their own git repositories.
The constraint
Old specs must keep loading. A published agent's spec is stored as it was written. A change that only parses new documents is a 500 on every run of something nobody touched.
model_config = ConfigDict(extra="forbid") means an unknown key is a hard error, so
this is not theoretical. SPEC_VERSION is currently 14.
What each change costs
| Change | Cost |
| Add an optional field with a default | Free. Old specs take the default |
| Add a required field | Not allowed. Give it a default, or a mode="before" validator that supplies one |
| Rename a field | A mode="before" validator that moves the old key. CapabilityBindingSpec._fold_the_knowledge_capabilitys_own_rename is the worked example |
| Remove a field | Drop it in a mode="before" validator and log a warning — never let extra="forbid" raise on a stored spec. See _MODEL_SETTINGS_WITHDRAWN |
| Narrow a rule (shorter max, tighter pattern, new enum) | The dangerous one — see below |
| Move behaviour to a capability | Fold the old value into a binding, don't just drop it. _with_thinking_binding is the pattern |
Bump SPEC_VERSION whenever a stored document needs migrating, and write the
migration in the same change.
Narrowing a rule is a data migration
A narrower rule does not only reject new input — it makes existing rows unreadable, and a Pydantic model that refuses to validate one field of one row takes down the whole listing endpoint with a 500.
IngestionConfig and its OCR language codes are the worked example outside the
spec: ocr_language went from "anything 2–16 characters" to Tesseract's
^[a-z]{3}(\+[a-z]{3})*$, and every row written before it held "en". The data
migration shipped in the same revision.
If you narrow anything in a spec field, the same applies: find every stored value first, and migrate it in the same change.
Two invariants a migration must preserve
Idempotence. An explicitly-set value wins over a migrated one, so re-reading a spec the validator already migrated changes nothing. Both existing validators are written this way; keep it.
Refusal at publish, never at run time. An unknown capability id, an ungranted
scope, a tool_approval keyed on a tool that does not exist, an unrenderable tool
name, a secret_id of the wrong kind or from another organization, a personal MCP
connection — all refused while somebody is looking at a form. Validation added to the
runner instead is a broken agent in production rather than a red field in the Builder.
app/services/agent_registry.py owns publish validation. _tool_override_problems is
the shape to copy: collect every problem and report them together.
What the spec deliberately excludes
Anything about where it runs (surfaces, channels, exposures) and who may use it (owner, sharing). Those are deployment and access facts; keeping them out is what lets the same spec be exported, reviewed and reused across organizations.
It also carries no secret values — only secret_id references. A spec goes into a
client's git repository.
YAML
to_yaml keeps spec order rather than sorting, so a diff reflects what changed rather
than where it happens to sort, and UUIDs become strings so the file round-trips
through any reader. from_yaml raises ValueError on a non-mapping document, because
a list or a bare string reaches Pydantic as an unhelpful type error.
Round-trip is part of the contract: spec == AgentSpec.from_yaml(spec.to_yaml()).
Test
tests/test_agent_spec_and_factory.py. Every migration needs a test that loads a
verbatim old document — not one built from the current model, which cannot fail.
Plus the round-trip, the duplicate-capability refusal, and each publish refusal.
app/agents/** is held to 100%. See the backend-tests skill.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

