create-github-issue
Skill32 starsChanged 25 days agoMITView on GitHub
Draft a GitHub issue for this repo, saved to <short-kebab-title>.md at the repo root for review before it's filed. Use whenever the user wants to create or draft a GitHub issue for this repo, e.g. "create a github issue for X" — including turning any rough idea into one.
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- microsoft/simplechattheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- NVIDIA/OpenShelltheir own version, first seen Oct 14, 2026
- dannys-code-corner/incantheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- socktainer/socktainertheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- podman-desktop/podman-desktoptheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- couimet/my-claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Aug 19, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- NVIDIA/OpenShell★ 21ksame name
- podman-desktop/podman-desktop★ 8.1ksame name
- socktainer/socktainer★ 630same name
- microsoft/simplechat★ 157same name
- dannys-code-corner/incan★ 73same name
- couimet/my-claude-skills★ 1same name
- kweaver-ai/skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- bump-npm-depsSkill
- create-gitlab-taskSkill
- debug-production-runSkill
- sync-architectureSkill
- update-changelogSkill
- update-server-depsSkill
The file
Files
Discuss the item with the user until they have no more concerns, then write its <short-kebab-title>.md. If drafting several items in one sitting, do them one at a time rather than batching — each needs its own back-and-forth before it's committed to a file. Write every paragraph in the draft (and in this skill) as a single line in the source, no matter how long — Markdown collapses a paragraph to one flow regardless, so a mid-sentence line break only makes the raw file harder to edit and diff.
1. Draft the content
Sections: Summary, Why, Acceptance Criteria, Notes. Title and labels are tracked separately from these — see step 2 — never as a heading or section inside the body: GitHub already renders both natively (title field, labels sidebar), so writing them into the body just duplicates what the issue page already shows.
- Summary/Why: usually needs asking, not assuming — a bare idea or short phrase doesn't say what problem it solves or what "done" looks like. Ask.
- Acceptance Criteria: for a normal dev task, checkboxes of observable, testable behavior — what a reviewer can verify from the outside (when something fires vs. skips, what changes for the caller/user, what stays unchanged) — never implementation steps (which file to edit, which function or schema field to add, which existing helper to reuse). If a checkbox reads like a diff summary rather than something you could verify by exercising the feature, it belongs in Notes instead. For a research/monitoring item (how does the model react to X, monitor loop-detection accuracy) — phrase criteria as findings to produce, not pass/fail behavior: "write up observed failure modes for prompt variant A vs B", "report loop-detection false-positive rate over N sampled runs".
- Notes: context and pointers only (relevant files, a concrete trigger condition for deferred work, open questions) — this is also where implementation-level specifics steered out of Acceptance Criteria land (which file/function to touch, an existing helper to reuse, a schema key's exact type) — never restate what a label already says. "Not urgent yet" or "high priority" duplicates
priority: low/priority: high; if it's worth saying, say the reason (e.g. "revisit once X grows past Y"), not the priority itself. When pointing at code, name the file and a grep-able symbol/string (a function name, a marker), never a line number — line numbers go stale the next time the file changes, while a symbol is still findable by search even after it moves. - Relating to another issue: reference it in prose with GitHub's own auto-linking (
#123, orowner/repo#123for cross-repo) — GitHub turns these into real linked references automatically, no separate link-creation step needed. - Title:
[PREFIX] Title, with the prefix derived from thetype: *label the way this repo's existing issues do it ([FEAT],[BUG],[REFACTOR],[PERF],[SEC],[DOC]) — excepttype: maintenance, which is[TASK]. Checkgh issue list --state allif unsure. Settle on it while discussing the draft — it's what names the file (step 2) and fills--title(step 3), not something written inside the body. - Labels: one
type: *(type: bug,type: feature,type: refactor,type: performance,type: maintenance,type: documentation,type: security) and, if the conversation makes one obvious, onepriority: *(priority: high,priority: medium,priority: low). These must already exist on the repo (gh label list) — if the one you need is missing, create it first:gh label create "type: performance" --color <hex> --description "...". Don't invent a new label for a one-off item; pick the closest existing type. Settle on these the same way as the title — they fill--labelin step 3, not a section in the body.
2. Write the file
Save to <short-kebab-title>.md at the repo root, named after the issue's title. This is a local scratch file, not something this skill files from on its own. Start the file directly at ## Summary — no title heading above it (see Title, above).
3. Move on
Once the user confirms the draft has no more concerns, ask how they want it to land on GitHub:
- Create it now:
gh issue create --title "[PREFIX] Title" --body-file <short-kebab-title>.md --label "type: <x>" [--label "priority: <x>"]— but only after the user explicitly confirms, since this is a write to a shared system. Then delete the local draft file. - Manual copy-paste: tell the user the intended title and labels in chat (they go in GitHub's separate title field and labels picker, not the body), then leave the file for them to paste as the description; delete it once they confirm it's been created.
Either way, the draft file doesn't stick around — go on to the next item.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

