publish-spec-gitlab-milestone
Skill1 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when publishing an approved spec as a GitLab milestone with a ready-for-agent anchor issue. Not for ticket breakdowns or milestone admin.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- vladcheck/skillsword for word, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- vladcheck/skills★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- analyze-session-pingpong-logsSkill
- create-glossarySkill
- deepseek-reasoning-tier-clarifierSkill
- defineSkill
- find-alternativesSkill
- get-note-links-from-textSkill
- gitlab-eas-tickets-publishSkill
- gitlab-mr-roundtripSkill
- git-rebuild-branchSkill
- git-sequentialSkill
- gost-report-rebuildSkill
- mattpocock-skills-researchSkill
- mirea-moodle-downloadSkill
- obsidian-add-links-to-noteSkill
- opsx-spec-validateSkill
- paretto-principleSkill
- publish-tickets-gitlabSkill
- solidSkill
- update-skills-via-skills-shSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈7
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Write the complete spec to a temporary <spec-file>.
- Distinctive: line 32
Create the milestone and save the complete create response:
- Distinctive: line 48
Put the complete spec into the milestone description, addressing the milestone by its global REST ID:
- Very specific: line 55
Ensure the ready-for-agent triage label exists:
- Distinctive: line 61
If the label lookup returns 404, create the label:
- Distinctive: line 69
Stop on lookup errors other than 404.
- Very specific: line 71
Write a temporary <pointer-file> containing only the anchor text and milestone URL:
- Distinctive: line 81
Keep the full spec out of the anchor issue.
- Distinctive: line 83
Create or reuse the anchor issue:
- Distinctive: line 105
Verify the persisted milestone description and issue metadata before reporting completion:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Publish a spec as a GitLab milestone
Publish the complete spec in the milestone description. Use the anchor issue only as a pointer to that description and as the carrier of the ready-for-agent triage label.
Procedure
- Obtain
<repo>, the numeric REST<project-id>,<milestone-title>, the approved spec, and, when converting an existing plain issue, its<issue-iid>. Use<milestone-id>only for the global numeric REST milestoneid, never for a project-scoped IID. Write the complete spec to a temporary
<spec-file>. Preserve the approved content and use this English section template:# Problem Statement # Solution # User Stories # Implementation Decisions # Testing Decisions # Out of Scope # Further NotesCreate the milestone and save the complete create response:
glab api projects/<project-id>/milestones -X POST \ -f title="<milestone-title>" > <milestone-response>Extract
<milestone-id>and<milestone-url>directly from that response:jq -r '.id' <milestone-response> jq -r '.web_url' <milestone-response>Require a nonempty numeric
idand a nonemptyweb_urlbefore continuing. Do not recover the ID by listing milestones or indexing an array.Put the complete spec into the milestone description, addressing the milestone by its global REST ID:
glab api projects/<project-id>/milestones/<milestone-id> -X PUT \ -f description=@<spec-file>Ensure the
ready-for-agenttriage label exists:glab api projects/<project-id>/labels/ready-for-agentIf the label lookup returns 404, create the label:
glab api projects/<project-id>/labels -X POST \ -f name="ready-for-agent" \ -f color="#95a5a6"Stop on lookup errors other than 404.
Write a temporary
<pointer-file>containing only the anchor text and milestone URL:The complete specification is maintained in the milestone description: <milestone-url> Use the milestone description as the single source of truth. This anchor issue tracks implementation readiness.Keep the full spec out of the anchor issue.
- Create or reuse the anchor issue:
For a new anchor issue, run:
glab issue create --repo <repo> \ --title "Spec: <milestone-title>" \ --description-file <pointer-file> \ --milestone "<milestone-title>" \ --label ready-for-agent \ --yesCapture the created issue's project-scoped
<issue-iid>.To convert an existing plain issue, replace its body with the pointer and attach the milestone and triage label:
glab issue update <issue-iid> --repo <repo> \ --description-file <pointer-file> \ --milestone "<milestone-title>" \ --label ready-for-agent
Verify the persisted milestone description and issue metadata before reporting completion:
glab api projects/<project-id>/milestones/<milestone-id> > <milestone-verification> jq -e --rawfile spec <spec-file> \ '.description == $spec' <milestone-verification> glab issue view <issue-iid> --repo <repo>Confirm that the milestone response has the expected
<milestone-id>and title and that the comparison returnstrue. Confirm that the anchor issue has theready-for-agenttriage label, belongs to<milestone-title>, and contains only the pointer to the milestone description.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

