agentleFS
vitaedotaivitaedotai/agent/skills/job-intake/SKILL.md

job-intake

Skill0 starsChanged 39 days agoMITView on GitHub

Turn a recruiting vacancy or hiring-manager conversation into an agreed job brief, with requirements, constraints, and open questions.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Ask what the hire needs to accomplish in the first three and six months.

    line 17

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Job intake

Inputs

Start with the vacancy, hiring-manager notes, and any approved job description. Identify the client, role, hiring owner, location/work arrangement, employment type, compensation range and currency, hiring timeline, and interview process. Ask only for missing facts that affect the brief; preserve unknowns instead of inventing answers.

Procedure

  1. Ask what the hire needs to accomplish in the first three and six months. Turn vague labels such as “rockstar” into observable work outcomes.
  2. Separate must-have capabilities from preferences. For every must-have, record why it is needed and what evidence would demonstrate it. Challenge unnecessary credential or exact-title requirements with the hiring owner.
  3. Record logistics separately from capability: location, working hours, travel, compensation, start date, and any role-specific authorization requirement supplied by the employer. Do not infer eligibility from nationality or names.
  4. Capture the opportunity accurately: scope, team, reporting line, support, and progression. Mark any selling point that still needs confirmation.
  5. Resolve contradictory sources with the hiring owner. Keep source and date alongside disputed claims.
  6. Return the brief and a short decision list. An unconfirmed intake is a draft, not an approved vacancy.

Output

Produce: role summary; expected outcomes; must-haves with evidence; preferences; working conditions; approved compensation; process and owners; candidate proposition; unresolved questions with decision owners. State which questions block sourcing and which can wait.

Quality check

Can another recruiter explain success in the role without the original conversation? Are preferences clearly separated from requirements? Are salary, location, and process facts sourced? Avoid age, gender, family status, ethnicity, or “culture fit” proxies as selection criteria.

Example

Input: “Senior backend engineer, must know our exact framework, own reliability.”

Draft outcome: “Within six months, reduce recurring production incidents and own the on-call improvement plan.” Evidence: a concrete example of diagnosing incidents and preventing recurrence. Open question for the manager: is the exact framework essential on day one, or can experience with comparable systems suffice?

With Vitae

If connected, use live list_jobs/get_job and list_clients/get_client tools to identify the records. Never guess IDs. Prepare the brief before requesting a create_job_draft or update. Missing required API fields remain questions. Respect server approval responses and read back successful changes. Otherwise return a document the recruiter can enter in Vitae.

Completion and handoff

Hand the approved requirements to hiring-scorecard; retain open questions and the hiring owner's approval state. Do not publish a vacancy or start a paid search merely because the brief is complete.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.