job-intake
Skill0 starsChanged 39 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turn a recruiting vacancy or hiring-manager conversation into an agreed job brief, with requirements, constraints, and open questions.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- nomanAliShah786/claude-code-job-searchtheir own version, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- nomanAliShah786/claude-code-job-search★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- candidate-outreachSkill
- candidate-presentationSkill
- candidate-screeningSkill
- hiring-scorecardSkill
- interview-invitationSkill
- interview-kitSkill
- recruitment-workflowSkill
- sourcing-strategySkill
- vitaeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈1
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 17
Ask what the hire needs to accomplish in the first three and six months.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Job intake
Inputs
Start with the vacancy, hiring-manager notes, and any approved job description. Identify the client, role, hiring owner, location/work arrangement, employment type, compensation range and currency, hiring timeline, and interview process. Ask only for missing facts that affect the brief; preserve unknowns instead of inventing answers.
Procedure
- Ask what the hire needs to accomplish in the first three and six months. Turn vague labels such as “rockstar” into observable work outcomes.
- Separate must-have capabilities from preferences. For every must-have, record why it is needed and what evidence would demonstrate it. Challenge unnecessary credential or exact-title requirements with the hiring owner.
- Record logistics separately from capability: location, working hours, travel, compensation, start date, and any role-specific authorization requirement supplied by the employer. Do not infer eligibility from nationality or names.
- Capture the opportunity accurately: scope, team, reporting line, support, and progression. Mark any selling point that still needs confirmation.
- Resolve contradictory sources with the hiring owner. Keep source and date alongside disputed claims.
- Return the brief and a short decision list. An unconfirmed intake is a draft, not an approved vacancy.
Output
Produce: role summary; expected outcomes; must-haves with evidence; preferences; working conditions; approved compensation; process and owners; candidate proposition; unresolved questions with decision owners. State which questions block sourcing and which can wait.
Quality check
Can another recruiter explain success in the role without the original conversation? Are preferences clearly separated from requirements? Are salary, location, and process facts sourced? Avoid age, gender, family status, ethnicity, or “culture fit” proxies as selection criteria.
Example
Input: “Senior backend engineer, must know our exact framework, own reliability.”
Draft outcome: “Within six months, reduce recurring production incidents and own the on-call improvement plan.” Evidence: a concrete example of diagnosing incidents and preventing recurrence. Open question for the manager: is the exact framework essential on day one, or can experience with comparable systems suffice?
With Vitae
If connected, use live list_jobs/get_job and list_clients/get_client tools to identify the records. Never guess IDs. Prepare the brief before requesting a create_job_draft or update. Missing required API fields remain questions. Respect server approval responses and read back successful changes. Otherwise return a document the recruiter can enter in Vitae.
Completion and handoff
Hand the approved requirements to hiring-scorecard; retain open questions and the hiring owner's approval state. Do not publish a vacancy or start a paid search merely because the brief is complete.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

