agentleFS
victorhqcvictorhqc/filbert/.agents/skills/release-notes/SKILL.md

release-notes

Skill4 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Write the body text for a GitHub release in this repo — the Overview, Features, Bug Fixes, and full Changes list. Use this whenever the user asks to "write release notes", "draft the release text", "summarize what's in the release", or wants prose for a new GitHub release. Covers how to find the last release tag, list the commits and merged PRs on main since that tag, read the diffs and PR descriptions, and turn them into plain-English release notes.

176 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use brainstorm-experiments-existing, brainstorm-ideas-new and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • skytiger6724Skill

    brainstorm-experiments-existing

    Design experiments to test assumptions for an existing product — prototypes, A/B tests, spikes, and other low-effort validation methods. Use when validating assumptions, testing feature ideas cheaply, or planning product experiments.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • skytiger6724Skill

    brainstorm-ideas-new

    Brainstorm feature ideas for a new product in initial discovery from PM, Designer, and Engineer perspectives. Use when starting product discovery for a new product, exploring features for a startup idea, or doing initial ideation.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • 45ckSkill

    pestle-analysis

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • About-IntelligenceSkill

    positioning-ideas

    Brainstorm product positioning ideas differentiated from competitors.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • About-IntelligenceSkill

    product-name

    Brainstorm 5 unique, memorable product names with rationale aligned to brand values and target audience.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • +7 more from skytiger6724
  • Other versions176 projects use a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 176

    1. tw93/Mole★ 74ksame name
    2. makeplane/plane★ 62ksame name
    3. tabler/tabler★ 42ksame name
    4. pnpm/pnpm★ 37ksame name
    5. quasarframework/quasar★ 27ksame name
    6. dotnet/core★ 22ksame name
    7. zauberzeug/nicegui★ 16ksame name
    8. adobe/react-spectrum★ 16ksame name
    9. espanso/espanso★ 15ksame name
    10. microsoft/agent-framework★ 15ksame name

    166 more not listed

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 162 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 11

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Keep them true. Read the commits and the pull requests, then write what changed.

    line 9
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not guess. Work out the exact range of commits that will ship.

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    Use the main branch, not the current working branch:

    line 34
  4. Distinctive:

    If there are no commits since the last tag, stop and tell the user there is nothing to release.

    line 43
  5. Very specific:

    When a change is not clear from the title and PR body, read the diff.

    line 58
  6. Distinctive:

    Read only what you need to understand the change.

    line 66
  7. Distinctive:

    Use the Hemingway approach:

    line 79
  8. Distinctive:

    No filler. "In order to" is just "to".

    line 84
  9. Distinctive:

    No marketing. Say what the code does, not how amazing it is.

    line 85
  10. Distinctive:

    No restating the commit subject.

    line 86
  11. Distinctive:

    Write for a user who runs the app but has not seen this branch of the code.

    line 88
  12. Very specific:

    Keep the existing line format: - <subject> (#<PR>) (<short hash>).

    line 120
  13. Distinctive:

    Use the short hash, 7 characters.

    line 121
  14. Very specific:

    If a commit has no PR number, drop the (#NN) part but keep the subject and hash.

    line 122

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 162 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Release notes

Release notes tell the user what changed since the last version. Keep them short. Keep them true. Read the commits and the pull requests, then write what changed.

1. Find the release range

Do not guess. Work out the exact range of commits that will ship.

  1. Find the repository owner and name from the remote:

    git --no-pager remote get-url origin

    Parse the owner/repo from it.

  2. Find the last published release and its tag with the GitHub tools. Use get_latest_release (or list_releases and take the first entry).
  3. Resolve that tag to a commit so you know exactly where the last release ends:

    git --no-pager rev-parse <last-tag>
    git --no-pager log -1 <last-tag>
  4. List the commits on main (and main only) that will ship in this release. Use the main branch, not the current working branch:

    git --no-pager log <last-tag>..main --oneline

    The agent tools work too: list_commits with sha: main gives the history. Count the commits. This is the set of changes to write about.

    If there are no commits since the last tag, stop and tell the user there is nothing to release.

2. Read what changed

For each commit in the range, understand what it did. Do not stop at the commit subject.

  1. Find the merged pull requests in the range. Commit subjects often carry the PR number, e.g. feat: add tags view (#94). Collect those numbers.
  2. For each PR, read its description with pull_request_read using method: get. The PR description often states the intent and the fix in clearer terms than the commit.
  3. When a change is not clear from the title and PR body, read the diff. Use pull_request_read with method: get_diff for a PR, or for a bare commit:

    git --no-pager show <commit-sha> --stat
    git --no-pager show <commit-sha>

    Read only what you need to understand the change. Do not quote code back at the reader.

  4. Sort each change into one of three buckets:

    • Feature — new functionality the user can see or do.
    • Bug fix — something broken that is now fixed. Note what was broken and what the fix does.
    • Other — dependency upgrades, CI changes, refactors, tooling. These go in the plain Changes list, not in Features or Bug Fixes.

3. Write the release notes

Use the Hemingway approach:

  • Short sentences. One idea per sentence.
  • Plain words. No jargon when a common word works.
  • Active voice. The subject does the thing.
  • No filler. "In order to" is just "to". "At this point in time" is "now".
  • No marketing. Say what the code does, not how amazing it is.
  • No restating the commit subject. The overview adds new information.

Write for a user who runs the app but has not seen this branch of the code.

4. Template

Fill in each section. Drop a section if it has nothing to say. Do not pad.

The Changes list is the only section that lists every PR. Features and Bug Fixes summarize the user-facing changes in plain English.

## Overview

<One to three sentences. What is this release about? Name the big themes. A
user should know what to expect after reading this.>

## ✨ Features

- <Feature in one sentence. What can the user do now that they could not
  before? One bullet per feature. Group small related changes.>

## 🐛 Bug Fixes

- <What was broken, and what the fix does. One bullet per fix.>

## 📝 Changes since <last-tag>

- <PR title or commit subject> (#<PR number>) (<short hash>)
- <PR title or commit subject> (#<PR number>) (<short hash>)

Notes on the Changes list

  • Keep the existing line format: - <subject> (#<PR>) (<short hash>).
  • Use the short hash, 7 characters.
  • If a commit has no PR number, drop the (#NN) part but keep the subject and hash.
  • Preserve the original commit subject. Do not rewrite it. This list is the audit trail, not the summary.

5. Before you hand it back

  • The range is right. Every commit between the last tag and main is covered, and only those commits.
  • Every claim in Overview, Features, and Bug Fixes is grounded in a diff, a commit, or a PR description. No invented detail.
  • Features and Bug Fixes describe what the user sees, not the implementation.
  • The Changes list includes every PR in the range, in the original format.
  • Sentences are short. Words are simple.
  • A user can read it in under a minute and know what changed.

6. Next: the in-app highlights

The app shows a short version of Features and Bug Fixes after an update. The release workflow fails if Sources/App/Resources/ReleaseHighlights.json has no entry for the version. After these notes, tell the user to run the release-highlights skill and to merge its change before they publish the release.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.