system-architecture
Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when designing system architecture, microservices, or evaluating scalability and technology trade-offs — microservices review and risk identification.
9 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- hugo082/skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 22, 2026
- bingyue/fde-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- enekesabel/dev-flowtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- salvatorebottiglieri/agentic-dev-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- ProjAnvil/MindForgetheir own version, first seen Oct 9, 2026
- joelhooks/joelclawtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 9
- joelhooks/joelclaw★ 65same name
- hieutrtr/ai1-skills★ 8same name
- bingyue/fde-skills★ 5same name
- ProjAnvil/MindForge★ 3same name
- enekesabel/dev-flow★ 2same name
- Jacobinwwey/notemdpro★ 2same name
- salvatorebottiglieri/agentic-dev-kit★ 2same name
- augments-labs/sdlc-skills★ 1same name
- hugo082/skills★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository64 other files it gives its agents.
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- crazy-skills-catalogSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- git-workflow-and-versioningSkill
- using-git-worktreesSkill
- documentation-and-adrsSkill
- readme-generationSkill
- accessibilitySkill
- adverse-reviewSkill
- aeoSkill
- agent-designerSkill
- api-and-interface-designSkill
- best-practicesSkill
- browser-testing-with-devtoolsSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- ceo-advisorSkill
- ci-cd-and-automationSkill
- content-creatorSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- create-voltagentSkill
- cto-advisorSkill
- deep-researchSkill
- doubt-driven-developmentSkill
- frontend-ui-engineeringSkill
- gdprSkill
- idea-refineSkill
- incremental-implementationSkill
- interview-meSkill
- iso27001Skill
- local-seo-managerSkill
- mcp-server-builderSkill
- observability-and-instrumentationSkill
- performanceSkill
- planning-and-task-breakdownSkill
- product-manager-toolkitSkill
- research-orchestratorSkill
- saas-metrics-coachSkill
- seoSkill
- soc2Skill
- source-driven-developmentSkill
- spec-driven-developmentSkill
- tech-debt-trackerSkill
- voltagent-best-practicesSkill
- voltagent-core-referenceSkill
- voltagent-docs-bundleSkill
- web-quality-auditSkill
- using-crazy-skillsSkill
- writing-skillsSkill
- core-web-vitalsSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- context-compressionSkill
- prompt-enhancementSkill
- token-efficiencySkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- verification-before-completionSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- security-and-hardeningSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Files
System Architecture
Microservices and system design review. Composite of alirezarezvani/claude-skills engineering-team senior-architect + POWERFUL api-design-reviewer.
When to use
- Designing a new system, service boundary, or microservices split
- Reviewing an architecture for scalability, coupling, or failure modes
- Evaluating technology choices (DB, queue, infra) with trade-offs
Workflow
- Map the system — List components, data flow, dependencies, and interfaces. Draw a one-box-per-service diagram (Mermaid or ASCII).
- Propose 2-3 approaches — With trade-offs (latency, cost, operational burden) and your recommendation. Ruthlessly YAGNI — remove unnecessary components.
- Review checklist — For the chosen approach:
- Boundaries: does each service have one clear purpose? Can you change internals without breaking consumers?
- Data: ownership, consistency (eventual vs strong), schema evolution
- Failure: retries, timeouts, circuit breakers, observability
- Scale: stateful vs stateless, caching, partitioning
- Document — Write the validated design to
docs/architecture/<topic>.md(ordocs/superpowers/specs/if architectural per brainstorming).
Verification
- 2-3 approaches with trade-offs and a recommended option
- Sectioned design approved per section before committing
- Boundaries pass isolation test (change internals without breaking consumers)
- Failure and scale considerations are explicit, not deferred
References
- Source:
alirezarezvani/claude-skillsengineering-team/senior-architect, engineering/POWERFUL/api-design-reviewer
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

