agentleFS
VercelKnown publishervercel-labs/ui/.agents/skills/ui-sdk-write-docs/SKILL.md

ui-sdk-write-docs

Skill4.8k starsChanged 17 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Write or review ui-sdk website documentation in apps/docs/content/docs, including Core, framework, component, and agent guides. Use for new pages, prose edits, example explanations, and documentation reviews, following the current site's writing style.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write in the website's current style.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Read Writing Website Docs and its main voice reference, Build a Component.

    line 18
  3. Distinctive:

    When writing code examples, follow ui-sdk-write-code and the relevant framework conventions.

    line 26
  4. Very specific:

    Headings: keep TypeTable examples maps and incoming fragment links in sync with renamed headings.

    line 37
  5. Very specific:

    Live demos: run the relevant specs under tests/docs/ and try changed interactions in the rendered page.

    line 39

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Write ui-sdk Docs

Write in the website's current style. This skill is for contributors working on the website.

Size the work to the request. For a small edit, such as a sentence, caption, or typo, read the writing guide and the section you're changing, verify any API claim you change, and reread that section. For a new section, new page, or rewrite, follow the steps below. In either case, use only the checks the change reaches.

Honor the requested scope: a review produces findings, a draft stays in chat, and an edit changes files. Treat existing wording and structure as intentional. Preserve the maintainer's edits unless the request calls for revising them; suggest unrelated improvements separately.

1. Read the Page and Its Reference

Read Writing Website Docs and its main voice reference, Build a Component. Then read the page being changed and choose a reference for that page type from the guide. For a new page, read the neighboring pages so it continues what the reader already knows.

Identify what this page adds and which concepts can be linked instead of repeated.

2. Check What the API Does

For behavior you introduce or change in the explanation, inspect the relevant exported types, implementation, and tests. This matters especially for defaults, persistence, cancellation, SSR, and hydration. Resolve mismatches against the actual behavior rather than assuming either prose or JSDoc is correct. Keep planned capabilities separate from shipped behavior.

When writing code examples, follow ui-sdk-write-code and the relevant framework conventions.

3. Write the Explanation

Apply the writing guide to the requested scope. For changes shared across framework pages, update the corresponding copies with each framework's actual API. Framework-specific changes stay in the affected framework.

4. Read and Verify

Reread the changed section or page using the writing guide's final question. Check links, file titles, snippets, and generated references affected by the edit. Consult the docs-site guide for the implementation and the test guide for commands when these checks apply:

  • Walkthrough code: the React and Web Components docs-walkthrough tests extract code from Compose Behaviors and their Rendering pages. Check the extraction and run the affected tests when changing those snippets; update the tests if the documented behavior requires it.
  • Headings: keep TypeTable examples maps and incoming fragment links in sync with renamed headings. The maps derive anchors from heading text.
  • Component examples: tests/docs/props.spec.ts checks public API coverage in React examples. Preserve that coverage when replacing or removing examples, and check the corresponding framework copies.
  • Live demos: run the relevant specs under tests/docs/ and try changed interactions in the rendered page. Check captions and layout stability. A prose-only edit doesn't need a new demo or a full browser sweep.
  • MDX rendering: for changes to MDX components, tables, or framework-specific blocks, check both the rendered page and its Markdown export.

Report what changed and what was verified, including checks you couldn't run.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.