content-experimentation-best-practices
Skill5 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub
Content experimentation and A/B testing guidance covering experiment design, hypotheses, metrics, sample size, statistical foundations, CMS-managed variants, and common analysis pitfalls. Use this skill when planning experiments, setting up variants, choosing success metrics, interpreting statistical results, or building experimentation workflows in a CMS or frontend stack.
5 other projects use a version of this, 5 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- robotostudio/turbo-start-sanityedited, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- Aymenjdily/biblion-testing-agentic-ai-skillsedited, first seen Sep 4, 2026
- opencue/cuecardsedited, first seen Aug 17, 2026
- sanity-io/agent-toolkitedited, first seen May 13, 2026
- Oceanjackson1/Claude-Skilledited, first seen Mar 26, 2026
Other versions5 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 5
- sanity-io/agent-toolkit★ 19498% same
- robotostudio/turbo-start-sanity★ 18698% same
- opencue/cuecards★ 698% same
- Aymenjdily/biblion-testing-agentic-ai-skills★ 298% same
- Oceanjackson1/Claude-Skill★ 283% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository9 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- content-modeling-best-practicesSkill
- portable-text-conversionSkill
- portable-text-serializationSkill
- sanity-best-practicesSkill
- seo-aeo-best-practicesSkill
- writing-qualitySkill
- writing-qualitySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 5 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 33
Start with the reference that matches the current problem, such as design, statistics, CMS integration, or pitfalls.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 5 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Content Experimentation Best Practices
Principles and patterns for running effective content experiments to improve conversion rates, engagement, and user experience.
When to Apply
Reference these guidelines when:
- Setting up A/B or multivariate testing infrastructure
- Designing experiments for content changes
- Analyzing and interpreting test results
- Building CMS integrations for experimentation
- Deciding what to test and how
Core Concepts
A/B Testing
Comparing two variants (A vs B) to determine which performs better.
Multivariate Testing
Testing multiple variables simultaneously to find optimal combinations.
Statistical Significance
The confidence level that results aren't due to random chance.
Experimentation Culture
Making decisions based on data rather than opinions (HiPPO avoidance).
References
Start with the reference that matches the current problem, such as design, statistics, CMS integration, or pitfalls. See references/ for detailed guidance:
references/experiment-design.md— Hypothesis framework, metrics, sample size, and what to testreferences/statistical-foundations.md— p-values, confidence intervals, power analysis, Bayesian methodsreferences/cms-integration.md— CMS-managed variants, field-level variants, external platformsreferences/common-pitfalls.md— 17 common mistakes across statistics, design, execution, and interpretation
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

