seo-audit
Skill9 starsChanged 43 days agoMITView on GitHub
Run a comprehensive SEO audit — keyword research, on-page analysis, content gaps, technical checks, and competitor comparison. Use when assessing a site's SEO health, when finding keyword opportunities and content gaps competitors own, or when you need a prioritized action plan split into quick wins and strategic investments.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 166 edited versions we read keep these.
5
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 30
If not specified, default to full site audit.
- Distinctive: line 53
Use web search to research the keyword landscape
- Distinctive: line 193
After presenting the audit, ask:
- Distinctive: line 198
Create optimized title tags and meta descriptions for your key pages?
- Distinctive: line 201
Run this same analysis for a different competitor or domain?"
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 166 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
/seo-audit
If you see unfamiliar placeholders or need to check which tools are connected, see CONNECTORS.md.
Audit a website's SEO health, research keyword opportunities, identify content gaps, and benchmark against competitors. Produces a prioritized action plan a marketer can execute immediately.
Trigger
User runs /seo-audit or asks for an SEO audit, keyword research, content gap analysis, technical SEO check, or competitor SEO comparison.
Inputs
Gather the following from the user. If not provided, ask before proceeding:
- URL or domain — the site to audit, or a topic/keyword if running in keyword research mode
Audit type — one of:
- Full site audit — end-to-end SEO review covering all sections below
- Keyword research — identify keyword opportunities for a topic or domain
- Content gap analysis — find topics competitors rank for that you don't
- Technical SEO check — crawlability, speed, structured data, and infrastructure issues
- Competitor SEO comparison — head-to-head SEO benchmarking against specific competitors
If not specified, default to full site audit.
- Target keywords or topics (optional) — specific keywords the user is already targeting or wants to rank for
- Competitors (optional) — domains or companies to compare against. If not provided and the audit type requires competitor data, use web search to identify 2-3 likely competitors based on the user's domain and keyword space.
Process
1. Keyword Research
Research keywords related to the user's domain, topic, or target keywords.
If ~~SEO tools are connected:
- Pull keyword data, search volume, keyword difficulty scores, and ranking positions automatically
- Identify keywords the site currently ranks for and where it's gaining or losing ground
If ~~product analytics are connected:
- Cross-reference keyword targets with actual organic traffic data to validate which keywords are driving visits and conversions
If tools are not connected:
- Use web search to research the keyword landscape
- Note: "For more precise volume and difficulty data, connect an SEO tool like Ahrefs or Semrush via MCP. The audit will auto-populate with ranking data."
For each keyword opportunity, assess:
- Primary keywords — high-intent terms directly tied to the user's product or service
- Secondary keywords — supporting terms and variations
- Search volume signals — relative demand (high, medium, low) based on available data
- Keyword difficulty — how competitive the term is (easy, moderate, hard)
- Long-tail opportunities — specific, lower-competition phrases with clear intent
- Question-based keywords — "how to", "what is", "why does" queries that mirror People Also Ask results
- Intent classification — informational, navigational, commercial, or transactional
2. On-Page SEO Audit
For each key page (homepage, top landing pages, recent blog posts), evaluate:
- Title tags — present, unique, within 50-60 characters, includes target keyword
- Meta descriptions — present, compelling, within 150-160 characters, includes a call to action
- H1 tags — exactly one per page, includes primary keyword
- H2/H3 structure — logical hierarchy, uses secondary keywords where natural
- Keyword usage — primary keyword appears in the first 100 words, used naturally throughout, not over-stuffed
- Internal linking — pages link to related content, orphan pages identified, anchor text is descriptive
- Image alt text — all images have descriptive alt attributes, keywords included where relevant
- URL structure — clean, readable, includes keywords, no excessive parameters or depth
3. Content Gap Analysis
Identify what's missing from the user's content strategy:
- Competitor topic coverage — topics and keywords competitors rank for that the user's site does not cover
- Content freshness — pages that haven't been updated in 12+ months and may be losing rankings
- Thin content — pages with insufficient depth to rank (under 300 words for informational queries, lacking substance)
- Missing content types — formats competitors use that the user doesn't (guides, comparison pages, glossaries, tools, templates)
- Funnel gaps — missing content at specific buyer journey stages (awareness, consideration, decision)
- Topic clusters — opportunities to build pillar pages with supporting content
4. Technical SEO Checklist
Evaluate technical foundations that affect crawlability and rankings:
- Page speed — identify slow-loading pages and likely causes (large images, render-blocking scripts, excessive redirects)
- Mobile-friendliness — responsive design, tap targets, font sizes, viewport configuration
- Structured data — opportunities for schema markup (FAQ, HowTo, Product, Article, Organization, Breadcrumb)
- Crawlability — robots.txt configuration, XML sitemap presence and accuracy, canonical tags, noindex/nofollow usage
- Broken links — internal and external 404s, redirect chains
- HTTPS — secure connection, mixed content issues
- Core Web Vitals signals — LCP, FID/INP, CLS indicators based on observable page behavior
- Indexation — pages that should be indexed but may not be, duplicate content risks
5. Competitor SEO Comparison
For each competitor, compare:
- Keyword overlap — keywords both sites rank for, and where each site ranks higher
- Keyword gaps — terms the competitor ranks for that the user does not
- Domain authority signals — relative site strength based on backlink profiles, referring domains, and content depth
- Content depth — average content length, topic coverage breadth, publishing frequency
- Backlink profile observations — types of sites linking to competitors, link-worthy content they've produced
- SERP feature ownership — which competitor appears in featured snippets, People Also Ask, image packs, or knowledge panels
- Technical advantages — site speed differences, mobile experience, structured data usage
Output
Executive Summary
Open with a 3-5 sentence summary of overall SEO health. Highlight:
- The site's biggest strength
- The top 3 priorities that will have the most impact
- An overall assessment: strong foundation, needs work, or critical issues
Keyword Opportunity Table
| Keyword | Est. Difficulty | Opportunity Score | Current Ranking | Intent | Recommended Content Type |
Opportunity score: high, medium, or low — based on the combination of search demand, difficulty, and relevance to the user's business.
Include 15-25 keyword opportunities, sorted by opportunity score.
On-Page Issues Table
| Page | Issue | Severity | Recommended Fix |
Severity levels:
- Critical — directly hurting rankings or preventing indexation
- High — significant impact on SEO performance
- Medium — best practice violation, moderate impact
- Low — minor optimization opportunity
Content Gap Recommendations
For each content gap identified, provide:
- Topic or keyword to target
- Why it matters — search demand, competitor coverage, funnel stage
- Recommended format — blog post, landing page, guide, comparison page, etc.
- Priority — high, medium, or low
- Estimated effort — quick win (1-2 hours), moderate (half day), substantial (multi-day)
Technical SEO Checklist
| Check | Status | Details |
Status: Pass, Fail, or Warning.
Competitor Comparison Summary
| Dimension | Your Site | Competitor A | Competitor B | Winner |
Include rows for: keyword count, content depth, publishing frequency, backlink signals, technical score, SERP feature presence.
Prioritized Action Plan
Split recommendations into two categories:
Quick Wins (do this week):
- Actions that take under 2 hours and have immediate impact
- Examples: fix title tags, add meta descriptions, fix broken links, add alt text
Strategic Investments (plan for this quarter):
- Actions that require more effort but drive long-term growth
- Examples: build a topic cluster, create a pillar page, launch a link-building campaign, overhaul site structure
For each action item, include:
- What to do (specific and concrete)
- Expected impact (high, medium, low)
- Effort estimate
- Dependencies (if any)
Follow-Up
After presenting the audit, ask:
"Would you like me to:
- Draft content briefs for the top keyword opportunities?
- Create optimized title tags and meta descriptions for your key pages?
- Build a content calendar based on the gap analysis?
- Dive deeper into any specific section of the audit?
- Run this same analysis for a different competitor or domain?"
Other versions185 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 34k100% same
Wrote their own version · 184
- coreyhaines31/marketingskills★ 58ksame name
- every-app/open-seo★ 26ksame name
- AgriciDaniel/claude-seo★ 20ksame name
- trycompai/crm★ 12ksame name
- Ryze-AI-Adgent/open-seo-mcp-skills★ 8.4ksame name
- TheCraigHewitt/seomachine★ 7.5ksame name
- legions-developer/evilcharts★ 3.2ksame name
- MaxMiksa/Auto-Company★ 3.2ksame name
- MaxMiksa/Autonomous-Company★ 3.2ksame name
- compozy/compozy★ 2.8ksame name
174 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use openseo-release-notes, community-led-growth and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
JwuthriSkillopenseo-release-notes
Cut an OpenSEO release — bump the version, draft user-facing release notes from commits since the last tag, run a review + subagent-verification pass, and open a "release: vX.X.X" PR. Use when the user asks to prepare a release, bump the version, or write release notes.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillcommunity-led-growth
Expert in community-led growth (CLG) - leveraging user communities to drive acquisition, retention, and expansion. Covers building developer communities, user groups, ambassador programs, and turning customers into advocates. Knows the difference between community as a feature vs community as a growth engine, and how to measure community ROI. Use when "community-led, CLG, ambassador program, champion program, user community, developer community, word of mouth, user group, " mentioned.
Also in 5 projects that use this
nicepkgSkillph-community-outreach
Engage Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News and other communities for Product Hunt launches. Use this skill to identify relevant communities, craft appropriate posts, and drive cross-platform engagement without appearing spammy.
Also in 5 projects that use this
JwuthriSkillseo-project-setup
Set up a durable local SEO workspace with project context, notes, goals, positioning, preferences, MCP checks, and Search Console data intake.
Also in 9 projects that use this
akii-technologies-ltdSkillkeyword-clustering
Cluster and organize keywords into topical groups for SEO. Use when the user asks to "cluster keywords", "group keywords", "organize keywords", "keyword mapping", "topic clusters", "keyword grouping", "build a content plan", "pillar pages", "topical authority", "semantic clustering", or pastes a list of keywords.
Also in 11 projects that use this
xfstudioSkillmicro-saas-launcher
Expert in launching small, focused SaaS products fast - the indie hacker approach to building profitable software. Covers idea validation, MVP development, pricing, launch strategies, and growing to sustainable revenue. Ship in weeks, not months. Use when: micro saas, indie hacker, small saas, side project, saas mvp.
Also in 5 projects that use this
- +4 more from nicepkg
- +1 more from Jwuthri
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/better-auth.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/brand-review.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/campaign-plan.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/competitive-brief.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/content-creation.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/draft-content.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/effect-form-e2e.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/effect-sql-rls.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/email-sequence.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/grilling.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/grill-me.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/impeccable.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/performance-report.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/product-development.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/seo-audit.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/tanstack-start-ssr.mdcCursor rule
- better-authSkill
- brand-reviewSkill
- campaign-planSkill
- competitive-briefSkill
- content-creationSkill
- draft-contentSkill
- effect-form-e2eSkill
- effect-sql-rlsSkill
- email-sequenceSkill
- grillingSkill
- grill-meSkill
- impeccableSkill
- performance-reportSkill
- product-developmentSkill
- tanstack-start-ssrSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

