humanizer
Skill54 starsChanged 27 days agoMITView on GitHub
Polish existing prose, remove AI writing patterns, or match a specified voice when requested. Use for draft revision or writing audits, not ordinary technical answers.
188 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- aditya-vermax/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- chrisleekr/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- xhqing/CommunityManagerAgenttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- CloudChef/atlasclaw-providerstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Fractera/Agent-Engineering-Infrastructuretheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Fractera/Agentic-Engineering-Infrastructuretheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use economy-mode, personal-voice and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
Microsoft AzureSkilleconomy-mode
Shifts Layer 3 model selection to cost-optimized alternatives when economy mode is active.
Also in 4 projects that use this
petermuirurithuoSkillpersonal-voice
Captures the user's personality, communication style, and values. Use this skill whenever responding to the user, drafting anything on their behalf (emails, CVs, messages, opinions, explanations), or whenever tone, word choice, or how an opinion is delivered matters. Apply it by default for any prompt, not only when the user explicitly asks for "my style" or "my voice.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillarchitectural-proposals
How to write comprehensive architectural proposals that drive alignment before code is written
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +9 more from Azure
Other versions188 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 188
- NousResearch/hermes-agent★ 262ksame name
- blader/humanizer★ 63ksame name
- QuivrHQ/quivr★ 40ksame name
- The-Vibe-Company/quivr★ 40ksame name
- rommapp/romm★ 14ksame name
- github/gh-aw★ 5.6ksame name
- latitude-dev/latitude-llm★ 4.7ksame name
- github/squad★ 3.4ksame name
- compozy/compozy★ 2.9ksame name
- SRombauts/SQLiteCpp★ 2.8ksame name
178 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- ambitionSkill
- android-declutterSkill
- cmailSkill
- lark-cliSkill
- project-setupSkill
- python-scriptSkill
- refine-codeSkill
- scoutSkill
- tapSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
14 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 175 edited versions we read keep these.
14
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
If the user asks to humanize, de-AI, or make text sound natural, rewrite the text.
- Distinctive: line 17
If the user asks for a review or AI-writing audit, report the problems instead of rewriting.
- Distinctive: line 18
If the user provides a file path, read the file and either rewrite or edit it as requested.
- Distinctive: line 19
If the user provides a writing sample, calibrate to that voice before rewriting the target text.
- Distinctive: line 22
Keep the core information and stance.
- Distinctive: line 29
Look for clusters of tells.
- Distinctive: line 33
Prefer active voice and concrete nouns.
- Distinctive: line 38
Default: deliver the rewrite only — no commentary, no preamble, no issue list.
- Distinctive: line 40
When the user asks for a review or AI-writing audit instead of a rewrite, report the problems:
- Distinctive: line 49
Add brief notes only when they change a decision the user must make — suspicious facts, voice choices, or source meaning you had to …
- Distinctive: line 54
When the user provides a writing sample, inspect it before rewriting:
- Distinctive: line 62
Use the sample's rhythm and vocabulary to replace AI patterns.
- Distinctive: line 68
Be specific: use people, places, actions, numbers, and constraints instead of abstract judgment.
- Distinctive: line 71
Avoid inflated importance: do not wrap ordinary facts in significant, crucial, pivotal, or transformative language.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 175 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Humanizer
Turn text that sounds model-written into text that sounds human-written. The goal is not to add quirks or make the prose messy. Preserve meaning and author intent while removing AI tells, promotional padding, formulaic structure, and the fake smoothness that makes text feel generated.
Workflow
- Classify the task
- If the user asks to humanize, de-AI, or make text sound natural, rewrite the text.
- If the user asks for a review or AI-writing audit, report the problems instead of rewriting.
- If the user provides a file path, read the file and either rewrite or edit it as requested.
- If the user provides a writing sample, calibrate to that voice before rewriting the target text.
- Preserve meaning and coverage
- Keep the core information and stance.
- Cover the same substantive points as the source.
- Flag suspicious facts, citations, and data. Do not invent sources to patch gaps.
- Audit patterns before rewriting
- For a thorough review, read
references/ai-writing-patterns.md. - For a fast, strict cleanup, read
references/stop-slop-rules.md. - Look for clusters of tells. Do not rewrite normal human prose because of one em dash, one formal word, or one transition.
- For a thorough review, read
- Run the stop-slop final gate
- Cut greeting residue, meta commentary, filler, fake profundity, and boilerplate.
- Prefer active voice and concrete nouns.
- The final rewrite must contain no em dash or en dash.
Output format
Default: deliver the rewrite only — no commentary, no preamble, no issue list.
When the user asks for a review or AI-writing audit instead of a rewrite, report the problems:
## AI tells
- [the most important problems, each with a suggested fix]Add brief notes only when they change a decision the user must make — suspicious facts, voice choices, or source meaning you had to interpret.
Voice calibration
When the user provides a writing sample, inspect it before rewriting:
- Sentence length: short, long, or mixed?
- Word choice: casual, technical, formal, sharp, plain?
- Paragraph openings: direct, contextual, narrative?
- Punctuation habits: parentheses, colons, semicolons, dash substitutes?
- Transitions: explicit connectors or hard cuts?
Use the sample's rhythm and vocabulary to replace AI patterns. Do not sand the author's voice into clean but boring prose.
Rewrite principles
- Be direct: fewer announcements, more statements.
- Be specific: use people, places, actions, numbers, and constraints instead of abstract judgment.
- Keep rhythm alive: mix sentence lengths. Avoid slogan triples.
- Name the actor: people and systems act. Data, markets, culture, and decisions do not act on their own.
- Avoid inflated importance: do not wrap ordinary facts in significant, crucial, pivotal, or transformative language.
- Add personality only when it belongs: technical docs, legal text, and reference prose should stay plain. Essays, talks, posts, and personal writing can carry more edge.
Final hard check
Before delivery:
- Any opener like "Here's the thing", "It turns out", "Let me be clear", or "In today's..."? Cut it.
- Any "not X, but Y", "not just X but also Y", or "the real question is" construction? State Y directly.
- Any passive voice or "It is believed that"? Find the actor.
- Any false agency like "data tells us", "the decision emerged", or "market rewards"? Name who read, decided, bought, or changed behavior.
- Any rule of three, emoji, bold-label list, or Title Case heading? Flatten it unless the format requires it.
- Any em dash
—or en dash–? The final rewrite fails until those are gone. - Any fake upbeat ending like "the future looks bright"? Replace it with a concrete next step or stop.
Reference files
references/ai-writing-patterns.md— comprehensive Humanizer pattern catalog.references/stop-slop-rules.md— terse hard rules for the final cleanup pass.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

