agentleFS
uwuclxdyuwuclxdy/agenticat/skills/webapp-testing/SKILL.md

webapp-testing

Skill7 starsChanged 17 days agoMITView on GitHub

Playwright toolkit for local web apps: navigate, click, fill forms, screenshots, console logs.

196 other projects use a version of this, 168 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use academy-guide, skill-share and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • AnthropicSkill

    academy-guide

    Stop and check this skill before finishing any reply to a question about how to use Claude or a Claude product — it recommends matching courses, tutorials, and use cases from Claude Academy (academy.claude.com), Anthropic's learning hub. Trigger on: "how do I", "how can I", "getting started with", "what can Claude do", "teach me", "learn to use"; questions about artifacts, projects, skills, plugins, connectors, MCP; requests about rolling Claude out to a team, class, or organization; and any ask for training materials, onboarding content, or learning resources. Use it when the user is learning how to use a feature or product — not when they are mid-task and just want the task done. This skill composes with other skills: after consulting product documentation to answer how a Claude feature works, also check here for a matching course or tutorial — a docs-grounded answer and an Academy recommendation belong together. Only recommend on a strong match; never invent Academy content.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • ArogyaReddySkill

    skill-share

    A skill that creates new Claude skills and automatically shares them on Slack using Rube for seamless team collaboration and skill discovery.

    Also in 23 projects that use this

  • SKB3002Skill

    intelligent-routing

    Automatic agent selection and intelligent task routing. Analyzes user requests and automatically selects the best specialist agent(s) without requiring explicit user mentions.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • ArogyaReddySkill

    raffle-winner-picker

    Picks random winners from lists, spreadsheets, or Google Sheets for giveaways, raffles, and contests. Ensures fair, unbiased selection with transparency.

    Also in 26 projects that use this

  • zephyrwang6Skill

    topic-collector

    AI热点采集工具。从Twitter/X、Product Hunt、Reddit、Hacker News、博客等采集AI相关热点内容。当用户说"开始今日选题"、"采集热点"、"看看今天有什么新闻"、"今日AI热点"时触发。聚焦领域:Vibe Coding、Claude Skill、AI知识管理、AI模型更新、AI新产品、海外热点。

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • zephyrwang6Skill

    deepl

    Übersetzt Texte, Dokumente und XLIFF-Dateien via DeepL API. Verwende für Übersetzungen mit /deepl translate, /deepl file oder /deepl xliff.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • +4 more from zephyrwang6
  • +1 more from ArogyaReddy

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 1 is common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 1

    Common

    Most of the 190 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 0

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use sync_playwright() for synchronous scripts

    line 94
  2. Common:

    Always close the browser when done

    line 95
  3. Very specific:

    Use descriptive selectors: text=, role=, CSS selectors, or IDs

    line 96

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 190 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Vendored from anthropics/skills under Apache-2.0. Modified: description and when_to_use trigger rewrite, a Delegating section pointing at the paired webapp-tester agent shipped in this repo, a tone pass (emoji and all-caps emphasis removed), a wait-discipline pass replacing the fixed-duration wait_for_timeout advice and its two example uses with condition waits, a not-found-reads-boot bullet, and a Limits note that a screenshot gets read and judged, with a pixel diff as the secondary check.

Web Application Testing

To test local web applications, write native Python Playwright scripts.

Helper Scripts Available:

  • scripts/with_server.py - Manages server lifecycle (supports multiple servers)

Always run scripts with --help first to see usage. Don't read the source until the script has been run and shown not to fit the task. These scripts can be large; reading them pollutes your context window. They exist to be called directly as black boxes.

Decision Tree: Choosing Your Approach

UI/frontend only. For pure backend/API assertions without a browser, use Playwright's request context or a plain HTTP client instead (see Limits).

User task → Is it static HTML?
    ├─ Yes → Read HTML file directly to identify selectors
    │         ├─ Success → Write Playwright script using selectors
    │         └─ Fails/Incomplete → Treat as dynamic (below)
    │
    └─ No (dynamic webapp) → Is the server already running?
        ├─ No → Run: python scripts/with_server.py --help
        │        Then use the helper + write simplified Playwright script
        │
        └─ Yes → Reconnaissance-then-action:
            1. Navigate and wait for networkidle
            2. Take screenshot or inspect DOM
            3. Identify selectors from rendered state
            4. Execute actions with discovered selectors

Example: Using with_server.py

To start a server, run --help first, then use the helper:

Single server:

python scripts/with_server.py --server "npm run dev" --port 5173 -- python your_automation.py

Multiple servers (e.g., backend + frontend):

python scripts/with_server.py \
  --server "cd backend && python server.py" --port 3000 \
  --server "cd frontend && npm run dev" --port 5173 \
  -- python your_automation.py

To create an automation script, include only Playwright logic (servers are managed automatically):

from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright

with sync_playwright() as p:
    browser = p.chromium.launch(headless=True) # Always launch chromium in headless mode
    page = browser.new_page()
    page.goto('http://localhost:5173') # Server already running and ready
    page.wait_for_load_state('networkidle') # wait for JS to execute before inspecting
    # ... your automation logic
    browser.close()

Reconnaissance-Then-Action Pattern

  1. Inspect rendered DOM:
    page.screenshot(path='/tmp/inspect.png', full_page=True)
    content = page.content()
    page.locator('button').all()
    Note: screenshot() only saves an image, it does not diff against a baseline (see Limits).
  2. Identify selectors from inspection results
  3. Execute actions using discovered selectors

Common Pitfall

Inspecting the DOM before networkidle on a dynamic app reads a half-rendered page. Wait for page.wait_for_load_state('networkidle') first.

Best Practices

  • Use bundled scripts as black boxes - To accomplish a task, consider whether one of the scripts available in scripts/ can help. These scripts handle common, complex workflows reliably without cluttering the context window. Use --help to see usage, then invoke directly.
  • Use sync_playwright() for synchronous scripts
  • Always close the browser when done
  • Use descriptive selectors: text=, role=, CSS selectors, or IDs
  • Wait on the observable the next assertion reads, never on a duration. expect(locator).to_have_text(...) and its siblings retry until the value arrives; page.wait_for_selector(), page.wait_for_function() and page.expect_console_message(predicate) cover what expect does not. Make the condition the one your code is actually about: a bare expect_console_message() returns on the first message and misses everything logged after it, so pass the predicate that matches the message meaning the work finished. A page.wait_for_timeout() is a bet that the page settles inside a number someone picked, and it goes wrong exactly when the machine is loaded, which is when CI runs. Where an action genuinely produces nothing observable, keep the duration and write one line beside it saying which condition could not be expressed.
  • Two timeout budgets exist and they are set separately. Measured against Chromium: expect() defaults to 5000 ms, page.wait_for_* defaults to 30000 ms, and expect.set_options() moves only the first. A per-call timeout= beats both. Do not pass timeout=0 to set_options expecting no wait: 0 is falsy, so the default comes back and every check passes for the wrong reason.
  • not found read a fixed few seconds after an action on a dev-server SPA measures the app's boot, not the action's outcome -> poll for the app's own ready signal (an element, a postMessage, a network call) and only then record the absence.

Limits

  • screenshot() only saves an image. Read it and judge it as a viewer would; that is the check for "looks right". A pixel diff (Pillow, pixelmatch) answers only "did anything move", and needs a baseline someone judged.
  • UI/frontend only. For pure backend/API assertions without a browser, use Playwright's request context (playwright.request) or a plain HTTP client instead.

Reference Files

  • examples/ - Examples showing common patterns:
    • element_discovery.py - Discovering buttons, links, and inputs on a page
    • static_html_automation.py - Using file:// URLs for local HTML
    • console_logging.py - Capturing console logs during automation

Delegating

To verify an app as a subagent task, spawn the webapp-tester agent (agents/webapp-tester.md in this repo). It boots through scripts/with_server.py, drives the flows, and returns pass/fail with screenshot + console evidence. Use this skill inline only when driving the browser yourself.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.