agentleFS
utk2103utk2103/Prompt-Studio/skills/lean-gain/SKILL.md

lean-gain

Skill8 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

Show Lean's measured impact as a compact scoreboard: less code, more speed, from the benchmark medians. One-shot display, not a persistent mode, and not a per-repo number. Trigger: /lean-gain, "lean gain", "what does lean save", "show lean impact", "lean scoreboard".

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 0

    None found.

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 1

    1. FareedKhan-dev/lean-agent★ 1same name

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈0

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 1

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    No cost bar is shown by design, not omission: on single-shot tasks Lean's cost is roughly flat (~100–108% of baseline in latest.json) …

    line 45

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Lean Gain

Display this scoreboard when invoked. One-shot: do NOT change mode, write flag files, or persist anything.

The figures are Prompt-Studio's own benchmark medians, measured — not computed from the current repo. Source: benchmarks/results/latest.json and benchmarks/results/2026-08-12-lean-vs-ponytail.md.

Scoreboard

Render plain ASCII bars. The bar length shows the measured range; the label carries the exact figure:

  lean gain                          measured · gpt-4o-mini · n=3 · 7 tasks

  Lines of code   baseline  ████████████████████  100%
                  lean      ██████··············   25–35%   ▼ 65–75%
  Speed           lean      ▸ ~4× faster  (3.5–4.3×, full = 4.25×)

  Cost            not shown by design — see Honesty boundary.

  This repo:  /prompt-studio:lean-stats   (real tokens, this session)
              /prompt-studio:lean-debt    (counted shortcut ledger)
              /prompt-studio:lean-audit   (what's still cuttable)

Honesty boundary

These are benchmark medians, not this repo. NEVER print a per-repo savings number ("you saved X lines/tokens here"): the unbuilt version was never written, so there is no real baseline to subtract from in a live repo.

No cost bar is shown by design, not omission: on single-shot tasks Lean's cost is roughly flat (~100–108% of baseline in latest.json) because the Lean system-prompt input tokens offset the output-token savings. Claiming a cost win would contradict the measured data. For real per-session cost use /prompt-studio:lean-stats (actual token counts) and /prompt-studio:lean-debt (counted ledger); for what's still cuttable, /prompt-studio:lean-audit.

Basis is a single model (gpt-4o-mini, n=3) — the footer says so. Do not present it as multi-model.

Boundaries

One-shot display. Edits nothing, changes no mode. "stop lean" or "normal mode": revert.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.