coach
Skill41 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when planning a fork: more than one defensible direction and no active standard covers it. Settle the plan before work starts. Do not use merely because a request is vague or underspecified; vagueness takes a clarifying question, not a standard.
27 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jskswamy/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- barcia/running-coach-skilltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- furkantanyol/hevy-coachtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- rmarji/chiron-counciltheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- EtanHey/golemstheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- DayDreamingSheep/tennis-teamtheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
VercelSkillsetup
Set up Vercel CLI and project configuration. Use when the user says "set up Vercel", "configure Vercel", "link to Vercel", or "vercel init".
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions27 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 27
- felixrieseberg/claude-coach★ 200same name
- tance-mang/chinese-webnovel-skills★ 97same name
- coltonjosephdean-rgb/talk-to-anyone★ 61same name
- mycelium-hq/ai-brain-starter★ 50same name
- alxyrgin/health-os★ 38same name
- pablo-aa/my-fitness-claw★ 26same name
- dazuck/operator-skills★ 17same name
- taivop/marketplace★ 17same name
- coolxeo/grok-bot-skills★ 7same name
- barcia/running-coach-skill★ 6same name
17 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 23 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
Before anything else, confirm a standard can be written here:
- Distinctive: line 20
When the check passes: a fork with more than one defensible direction produces a standard before it produces an artifact.
- Distinctive: line 28
If yes, this is a fork, and it gets settled on the record before anything is drafted.
- Very specific: line 36
Record the choice: before drafting: node "<plugin-root>/scripts/coach-runner.mjs" record-fork --file <fork.json> writes …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 23 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Coach
Resolve runtime paths before file or script operations.
Before anything else, confirm a standard can be written here:
node "<plugin-root>/scripts/coach-runner.mjs" status --jsonExit 1 with the plugin-install-path error means the resolved project root sits inside the plugin install, and no standard can be recorded in this location. Say that plainly and stop. Do not draft around it, and do not put the record somewhere else.
When the check passes: a fork with more than one defensible direction produces a standard before it produces an artifact.
What counts as a fork
The test is not "am I unsure?". You can be entirely confident and still be one of several confident answers. Nor is it "is this vague?" — a request that is merely underspecified takes a clarifying question and nothing more. The test is:
Could another competent agent, reading the same evidence, reach a different defensible answer?
If yes, this is a fork, and it gets settled on the record before anything is drafted.
The output, in order
- Read the standards already on file —
.scc/standards/*/STANDARD.md. If one covers this fork, name it, follow it, and go to step 6. A settled question is not a fork. If itsreview_whenhas come true, say so and reopen it as a fork; the old record gets retired rather than edited, and the new one records what changed. - Name the fork. One line: what is being chosen between, in the user's own terms.
- Put every defensible direction on the table, each with the evidence that makes it defensible. Include the one you would have picked alone. Include "do not do the thing that was asked" whenever the evidence supports it — a rejected premise is a direction to offer, not a call to make alone.
- The user picks. One question, the directions as its options.
- Record the choice before drafting:
node "<plugin-root>/scripts/coach-runner.mjs" record-fork --file <fork.json>writes.scc/standards/<id>/STANDARD.md— the chosen direction, the rejected ones and why they lost, andreview_when, the condition that would reopen it. - Then produce the artifact, from the standard — and run
scripts/standard-check.mjsagainst it. A standard whose checks were never run against the work it governs did not govern anything.
Runtime
scripts/coach-runner.mjs is the authority for its own command syntax. It ships no usage output, so take syntax from the runner itself rather than from a list here, which drifts the moment the runner changes.
Two things the runner cannot tell you: its state and its standards live under the project's .scc/, never under the plugin install; and finalize stops at an approval gate — confirm, continue, plan-mode — rather than running the work. That call stays the user's.
See docs/skills/coach.md for scoring, state, artifacts, and troubleshooting.
Internal auto-mode fragments live under skills/coach/references/fragments/ with kind: skill-fragment. They are not public skills, commands, or skill:// routes.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

