quality-list
Skill0 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub
Single source of truth for universal code-quality items. Definitions live in items/<slug>.md; audit and preflight skills reference items by slug.
In this repository33 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- authoritative-text-rulesSkill
- breachreaperSkill
- bug-to-contractSkill
- code-review-gateSkill
- codex-contract-test-reviewSkill
- codex-plan-reviewSkill
- codex-reviewSkill
- copilot-reviewSkill
- debtreaperSkill
- diff-rootSkill
- docreaperSkill
- done-checkSkill
- driftreaperSkill
- file-adrSkill
- file-issueSkill
- file-pubdocSkill
- file-pullreqSkill
- finding-to-auditSkill
- finding-triageSkill
- gate-miss-to-issueSkill
- gh-body-auditSkill
- gh-body-conventionsSkill
- implementSkill
- land-via-integration-branchSkill
- read-issueSkill
- reimreSkill
- research-and-implementSkill
- researchSkill
- review-pipelineSkill
- review-telemetrySkill
- stage-commit-pushSkill
- todo-checkSkill
The file
Files
Quality List (SSOT)
Skills that audit or preflight against universal code-quality apply these items by reference. This binds the audit runner and the preflight runner alike: a runner may carry a compressed mnemonic of an item, but never the item's full triggers, concern conditions, N/A criteria, or enumerations — that copied detail is the manual-synchronization surface this rule removes — and the mnemonic is never the authority. The item body plus every applicable lang-<lang>.md addendum section is what determines whether an item applies and holds the item's full detail; a stale mnemonic cannot override it. The Items index below is likewise the single source of truth for which of this rule set's items exist and which lane each belongs to: runners derive their active set of universal code-quality items by reading this index, never by hardcoding a parallel slug list. A runner that also applies another rule set derives that set from its own SSOT's index the same way; this index says nothing about it.
Item lanes
Each item is tagged for which lane it belongs to when a consumer splits work between a fresh-context subagent and main context. The tags govern this rule set only; a runner applying another rule set alongside it routes that one by whatever its SSOT declares:
- mechanical — judgable from literal text alone (the diff, for an audit; the planned-scope description, for a preflight) plus literal code text and literal rule text, with no need for conversation history, plan context, or actual command execution. Delegated to a fresh-context subagent (
done-checkStep 2,todo-checkStep 2) to neutralize the author's blindspot for what their own comments, code, or planned scope actually say (vs what they meant them to say). - contextual — requires plan / intent / review history that only the main context has, OR requires running a command against the working tree to gather evidence. Stays in main context (
done-checkStep 3,todo-checkStep 3).
A small number of items are dual-lane: their detection has both mechanical (literal-grep) and contextual (history-aware) signals. Such items appear in both lanes; consumers (done-check, todo-check) route the relevant signal to the appropriate context. The current dual-lane item is ported-code-attribution (declared port = mechanical, undeclared port = contextual).
Each item's lane is declared once, in the Items index below (the — mechanical / — contextual suffix on each entry). Item files do not carry a lane tag in their H1 heading.
Items
Listed in canonical reading order. Reference items by slug (e.g., behavior-coverage); numbering is not stable and not part of the SSOT.
- invariant-derivation — contextual
- purpose-verification — contextual
- pattern-audit — contextual
- duplication-extraction — mechanical
- scope-discipline — contextual
- behavior-coverage — mechanical
- implementation-guards — mechanical
- impact-verification — mechanical
- test-execution — contextual
- completion-hygiene — contextual
- architectural-boundary — mechanical
- escape-hatch-necessity — contextual
- paired-artifact-drift — mechanical
- docstring-drift — contextual
- discovery-surfacing — contextual
- ported-code-attribution — mechanical (+ contextual half)
- signature-change-regression — mechanical
- public-doc-durability — mechanical
- public-api-surface — mechanical
Where an item body or addendum spells a detection command over the change under audit, <root-rev> in it is the revision form diff-root derives from the root the runner was given, and the range form is that skill's per-command conversion. Substitute the derived form, never the supplied one. A runner with no root does not run those commands: use the item's working-tree form where it offers one, and otherwise judge the item from the sources the run does have. Never substitute a range.
Language-specific addenda live alongside this file as lang-<language>.md and supplement specific items with triggers and mitigation idioms (current examples: lang-cpp.md, lang-rust.md). An addendum section realizes an item concretely; it never bounds the item: its triggers and N/A criteria scope only that realization, and a diff outside the realization's constructs remains subject to the base item's conditions.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

