watch-and-act
Skill2 starsChanged 4 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Wait on an EXTERNAL signal the harness can't notify you about — CI, a deploy, a queue, an endpoint — polling on a cache-aware cadence (≤270s active, ≥1200s idle, never ~300s), bounded by a deadline, acting on the transition. Prefers a NATIVE wait/monitor capability when present; when polling must cross a turn it persists a durable, atomic, resumable watch state (`scripts/watch-state.mjs`) so the ORIGINAL bound survives a fresh process and a missing wake capability degrades to a resumable PENDING report instead of blocking. Never polls harness-tracked background work (that re-invokes you automatically). Use to bridge a run to something happening elsewhere.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- adversarial-verifySkill
- auto-buildSkill
- auto-learnSkill
- auto-mapSkill
- autonomous-pipelineSkill
- auto-performanceSkill
- auto-planSkill
- auto-reviewSkill
- auto-shipSkill
- auto-simplifySkill
- auto-specSkill
- auto-testSkill
- budget-guardSkill
- checkpoint-resumeSkill
- converge-loopSkill
- fan-out-workSkill
- schedule-recurring-agentSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. About 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈11
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.