agentleFS
ukeSJTUukeSJTU/agents/.agents/skills/role-creator/SKILL.md

role-creator

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

Create and update Codex custom agents using standalone custom-agent TOML files.

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

11 rules. About 0 are common, 7 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈7

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 4

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Use this skill to author, update, or troubleshoot custom Codex agents as standalone TOML files.

    line 10
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not infer required values.

    line 33
  3. Distinctive:

    Do not write until required inputs are explicitly confirmed.

    line 34
  4. Distinctive:

    Must be a non-empty list of unique values when present.

    line 46
  5. Very specific:

    Do not add sandboxing/MCP/web-search/model extras unless requested.

    line 51
  6. Distinctive:

    Keep generated files minimal by default.

    line 52
  7. Distinctive:

    If the user says "inherit defaults", omit optional keys instead of setting explicit values.

    line 53
  8. Distinctive:

    Create or update the file directly with required keys.

    line 61
  9. Very specific:

    If runtime returns unknown agent_type, verify the active scope and confirm the file exists at the expected path.

    line 96
  10. Very specific:

    Check syntax first with tomlq or tomlq -C.

    line 97
  11. Distinctive:

    Keep role instructions operational and narrowly scoped to avoid drift.

    line 98

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Role Creator

Overview

Use this skill to author, update, or troubleshoot custom Codex agents as standalone TOML files.

Current behavior:

  • Each custom agent is defined by one file:
    • Global: ~/.codex/agents/<agent-name>.toml
    • Project: <project>/.codex/agents/<agent-name>.toml
  • The agent file is the role source of truth.
  • ~/.codex/config.toml is only for global/runtime settings (for example [agents] thread limits), not per-role registration.

Non-Negotiable Inputs

Step 1 is required before writing files:

  • name (role identifier used by agent_type)
  • description (short, human-readable purpose)
  • developer_instructions
  • model (recommend gpt-5.3-codex unless requested)
  • model_reasoning_effort (none|minimal|low|medium|high|xhigh)
  • role scope (global or project)
  • output TOML path (canonical absolute path preferred)
  • whether to include nickname_candidates and exact values

Execution rule:

  • Do not infer required values.
  • Do not write until required inputs are explicitly confirmed.

Role file contract (current)

From Codex custom agent docs (/codex/subagents):

  • Required keys: name, description, developer_instructions.
  • Optional keys: nickname_candidates, model, model_reasoning_effort, sandbox_mode, web_search, mcp_servers, skills.config, etc.
  • name is the spawn identifier and source of truth.
  • description + developer_instructions define behavior and usage boundaries.
  • nickname_candidates is optional and used only for display.

nickname_candidates requirements:

  • Must be a non-empty list of unique values when present.
  • Allowed characters: ASCII letters, digits, spaces, hyphens, underscores.

Default policy for optional settings

  • Do not add sandboxing/MCP/web-search/model extras unless requested.
  • Keep generated files minimal by default.
  • If the user says "inherit defaults", omit optional keys instead of setting explicit values.

Workflow

  1. Collect and confirm required inputs.
  2. Resolve output path:
    • global → ~/.codex/agents/<name>.toml
    • project → <project>/.codex/agents/<name>.toml
  3. Create or update the file directly with required keys.
  4. Validate TOML parse and required keys.
  5. Return a ready-to-run example call:
{"agent_type":"<name>","message":"<task>"}

Commands

# 1) Write a standalone custom-agent file
/home/willr/Applications/skills/skills/role-creator/scripts/write_role_config.sh \
  --output ~/.codex/agents/reviewer.toml \
  --role-name reviewer \
  --description "PR reviewer focused on correctness, security, and risk." \
  --model gpt-5.4 \
  --reasoning high \
  --developer-instructions "Review code like an owner. Lead with concrete findings and residual risks."

# Optional: include nickname candidates for display
/home/willr/Applications/skills/skills/role-creator/scripts/write_role_config.sh \
  --output ~/.codex/agents/reviewer.toml \
  --role-name reviewer \
  --description "PR reviewer focused on correctness, security, and risk." \
  --model gpt-5.4 \
  --reasoning high \
  --developer-instructions "Review code like an owner. Lead with concrete findings and residual risks." \
  --nickname-candidates "Atlas,Delta,Echo" \
  --sandbox-mode read-only \
  --web-search disabled

Guardrails

  • If runtime returns unknown agent_type, verify the active scope and confirm the file exists at the expected path.
  • Check syntax first with tomlq or tomlq -C.
  • Keep role instructions operational and narrowly scoped to avoid drift.

References

  • Codex subagents docs: https://developers.openai.com/codex/subagents
  • Display nicknames: https://developers.openai.com/codex/subagents#display-nicknames
  • Reusable templates: templates/

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.