gitnexus-debugging
Skill310 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when the user is debugging a bug, tracing an error, or asking why something fails. Examples: \"Why is X failing?\", \"Where does this error come from?\", \"Trace this bug\"
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 3 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 20
Call list_repos {} before the first tool call.
- Very specific: line 108
When no path exists, trace reports the furthest reachable node — exactly where the chain breaks (dynamic dispatch, reflection, or an …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 3 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Debugging with GitNexus
When to Use
- "Why is this function failing?"
- "Trace where this error comes from"
- "Who calls this method?"
- "This endpoint returns 500"
- Investigating bugs, errors, or unexpected behavior
Bind the repository first
A root cause traced in the wrong repository is a wrong root cause.
Call list_repos {} before the first tool call. With one indexed repository,
use the examples below as written. With more than one, pass repo on every
call: an omitted repo normally errors, but under an MCP policy with a
configured default it resolves to that default silently. If you cannot tell
which repository is meant, stop and ask. This matters most for cypher, whose
statement carries no in-band hint of which database it ran against.
list_repos is paginated, so page with offset: pagination.nextOffset until
hasMore is false before concluding a repository is absent.
A stale index describes the code from before your bug, so refresh before trusting a trace, and state the repository and index freshness with the diagnosis.
Workflow
0. list_repos {} → Bind repo
1. query({search_query: "<error or symptom>"}) → Find related execution flows
2. context({name: "<suspect>"}) → See callers/callees/processes
3. READ gitnexus://repo/{name}/process/{name} → Trace execution flow
4. cypher({statement: "MATCH path..."}) → Custom traces if neededIf "Index is stale" → run
node .gitnexus/run.cjs analyzein terminal.
Checklist
- [ ] list_repos {} — bind repo; explicit repo when >1 indexed, ask if ambiguous
- [ ] Understand the symptom (error message, unexpected behavior)
- [ ] query for error text or related code
- [ ] Identify the suspect function from returned processes
- [ ] context to see callers and callees
- [ ] Trace execution flow via process resource if applicable
- [ ] cypher for custom call chain traces if needed
- [ ] Read source files to confirm root cause
- [ ] State the repository and index freshness with the diagnosisDebugging Patterns
| Symptom | GitNexus Approach |
| Error message | query for error text → context on throw sites |
| Wrong return value | context on the function → trace callees for data flow |
| Intermittent failure | context → look for external calls, async deps |
| Performance issue | context → find symbols with many callers (hot paths) |
| Recent regression | detect_changes to see what your changes affect — pass worktree for a linked worktree |
| "How does A reach B?" | trace between the two symbols — shortest call chain in one call |
Tools
query — find code related to error:
query({search_query: "payment validation error", repo: "my-app"})
→ Processes: CheckoutFlow, ErrorHandling
→ Symbols: validatePayment, handlePaymentError, PaymentExceptioncontext — full context for a suspect:
context({name: "validatePayment", repo: "my-app"})
→ Incoming calls: processCheckout, webhookHandler
→ Outgoing calls: verifyCard, fetchRates (external API!)
→ Processes: CheckoutFlow (step 3/7)cypher — custom call chain traces. Pass repo alongside the statement; the
Cypher text itself names no repository, so the result is unattributable without
it:
MATCH path = (a)-[:CodeRelation {type: 'CALLS'}*1..2]->(b:Function {name: "validatePayment"})
RETURN [n IN nodes(path) | n.name] AS chaintrace — shortest call chain between two symbols ("how does A reach B?"), one call instead of chaining context hops:
trace({ from: "processCheckout", to: "fetchRates", repo: "my-app" })
→ status: ok, hopCount: 3
→ hops: processCheckout → validatePayment → verifyCard → fetchRates
→ edges: CALLS (1.0), CALLS (0.95), CALLS (1.0)When no path exists, trace reports the furthest reachable node — exactly where the chain breaks (dynamic dispatch, reflection, or an external boundary).
Example: "Payment endpoint returns 500 intermittently"
0. list_repos {}
→ total: 2 (my-app, billing-api) — bind my-app explicitly on every call
1. query({search_query: "payment error handling", repo: "my-app"})
→ Processes: CheckoutFlow, ErrorHandling
→ Symbols: validatePayment, handlePaymentError
2. context({name: "validatePayment", repo: "my-app"})
→ Outgoing calls: verifyCard, fetchRates (external API!)
3. READ gitnexus://repo/my-app/process/CheckoutFlow
→ Step 3: validatePayment → calls fetchRates (external)
4. Root cause: fetchRates calls external API without proper timeout
Repository: my-app Index: currentWith a single indexed repository, step 0 returns total: 1 and the repo
argument drops out of every call above.
Other versions10 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 4
- kunwarVivek/mcp-github-project-manager★ 104100% same
- haoxiang-xu/PuPu★ 36100% same
- pandich93/youtube-niche-finder★ 23100% same
- MarkChu-git/typesafe-mcp★ 2100% same
Edited · 6
- abhigyanpatwari/GitNexus★ 48k68% same
- doobidoo/mcp-memory-service★ 2.1k61% same
- metagit-ai/metagit-cli★ 499% same
- vasceannie/slopgate★ 189% same
- AlexHercules/skills★ 067% same
- ErrorNotFound808/claude-skills★ 083% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- dashclaw-governanceSkill
- gitnexus-cliSkill
- gitnexus-debuggingSkill
- gitnexus-exploringSkill
- gitnexus-guideSkill
- gitnexus-impact-analysisSkill
- gitnexus-refactoringSkill
- c--projects-dashclaw-route-changesSkill
- dashclaw-governanceSkill
- dashclaw-shipSkill
- dashclaw-weeklySkill
- gitnexus-cliSkill
- gitnexus-exploringSkill
- gitnexus-guideSkill
- gitnexus-impact-analysisSkill
- gitnexus-refactoringSkill
- reproSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

