fix
Skill224 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
ALWAYS activate this skill before fixing ANY bug, error, test failure, CI/CD issue, type error, lint, log error, UI issue, code problem.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 69 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 23
First action: If there is no "auto" keyword in the request, use AskUserQuestion to determine workflow mode:
- Distinctive: line 38
Create report with all findings for the next step.
- Very specific: line 51
Task Orchestration (Moderate+ only): After classifying, create native Claude Tasks for all phases upfront with dependencies.
- Very specific: line 53
Use TaskCreate with addBlockedBy for dependency chains
- Very specific: line 54
Update via TaskUpdate as each phase completes
- Very specific: line 68
Ask user if they want to commit via git-manager subagent
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 69 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Fixing
Unified skill for fixing issues of any complexity with intelligent routing.
Arguments
--auto- Activate autonomous mode (default)--review- Activate human-in-the-loop review mode--quick- Activate quick mode--parallel- Activate parallel mode: route to parallelfullstack-developeragents per issue
Workflow
Step 1: Mode Selection
First action: If there is no "auto" keyword in the request, use AskUserQuestion to determine workflow mode:
| Option | Recommend When | Behavior |
| Autonomous (default) | Simple/moderate issues | Auto-approve if score >= 9.5 & 0 critical |
| Human-in-the-loop Review | Critical/production code | Pause for approval at each step |
| Quick | Type errors, lint, trivial bugs | Fast debug → fix → review cycle |
See references/mode-selection.md for AskUserQuestion format.
Step 2: Debug
- Activate
debugskill. - Guess all possible root causes.
- Spawn multiple
Exploresubagents in parallel to verify each hypothesis. - Create report with all findings for the next step.
Step 3: Complexity Assessment & Task Orchestration
Classify before routing. See references/complexity-assessment.md.
| Level | Indicators | Workflow |
| Simple | Single file, clear error, type/lint | references/workflow-quick.md |
| Moderate | Multi-file, root cause unclear | references/workflow-standard.md |
| Complex | System-wide, architecture impact | references/workflow-deep.md |
| Parallel | 2+ independent issues OR --parallel flag | Parallel fullstack-developer agents |
Task Orchestration (Moderate+ only): After classifying, create native Claude Tasks for all phases upfront with dependencies. See references/task-orchestration.md.
- Skip for Quick workflow (< 3 steps, overhead exceeds benefit)
- Use
TaskCreatewithaddBlockedByfor dependency chains - Update via
TaskUpdateas each phase completes - For Parallel: create separate task trees per independent issue
Step 4: Fix Implementation & Verification
- Implement fix per selected workflow, updating Tasks as phases complete.
- Spawn multiple
Exploresubagents to verify no regressions. - Prevent future issues by adding comprehensive validation.
Step 5: Finalize (MANDATORY - never skip)
- Report summary: confidence score, changes, files
docs-managersubagent → update./docsif changes warrant (NON-OPTIONAL)TaskUpdate→ mark ALL Claude Taskscompleted- Ask user if they want to commit via
git-managersubagent
IMPORTANT: Skill/Subagent Activation Matrix
See references/skill-activation-matrix.md for complete matrix.
Always activate: debug (all workflows)
Conditional: problem-solving, sequential-thinking, brainstorm-technical, brainstorm-features, context-engineering
Subagents: debugger, researcher, planner, code-reviewer, tester, Bash
Parallel: Multiple Explore agents for scouting, Bash agents for verification
Output Format
Unified step markers:
✓ Step 0: [Mode] selected - [Complexity] detected
✓ Step 1: Root cause identified - [summary]
✓ Step 2: Fix implemented - [N] files changed
✓ Step 3: Tests [X/X passed]
✓ Step 4: Review [score]/10 - [status]
✓ Step 5: Complete - [action taken]References
Load as needed:
references/mode-selection.md- AskUserQuestion format for modereferences/complexity-assessment.md- Classification criteriareferences/task-orchestration.md- Native Claude Task patterns for moderate+ workflowsreferences/workflow-quick.md- Quick: debug → fix → reviewreferences/workflow-standard.md- Standard: full pipeline with Tasksreferences/workflow-deep.md- Deep: research + brainstorm-technical + plan with Tasksreferences/review-cycle.md- Review logic (autonomous vs HITL)references/skill-activation-matrix.md- When to activate each skillreferences/parallel-exploration.md- Parallel Explore/Bash/Task coordination patterns
Specialized Workflows:
references/workflow-ci.md- GitHub Actions/CI failuresreferences/workflow-logs.md- Application log analysisreferences/workflow-test.md- Test suite failuresreferences/workflow-types.md- TypeScript type errorsreferences/workflow-ui.md- Visual/UI issues (requires design skills)
Other versions75 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- docaohieu2808/claude-skills★ 075% same
Wrote their own version · 74
- facebook/react★ 252ksame name
- react/react★ 251ksame name
- motiondivision/motion★ 35ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- crbnos/carbon★ 2.8ksame name
- Akylas/OSS-DocumentScanner★ 2.6ksame name
- kdlbs/kandev★ 1ksame name
- GoogleCloudPlatform/magic-modules★ 975same name
64 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use feature, frontend-code-review and 8 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
EffortlessMetricsSkillfeature
Also in 10 projects that use this
chendongqiSkillfrontend-code-review
Trigger when the user requests a review of frontend files (e.g., `.tsx`, `.ts`, `.js`). Support both pending-change reviews and focused file reviews while applying the checklist rules.
Also in 4 projects that use this
GoogleSkillpr-creator
Also in 4 projects that use this
vbrevikSkillwork
Use when the user says 'plan', 'todo', 'copy plan', 'append plan', 'resume plan', 'priorities', or 'what's next'.
Also in 4 projects that use this
MetaSkillroadmap
Build, continue, inspect, or visualize a source-grounded mathematical roadmap and theorem DAG in an existing Autoform Markdown blueprint. Use for source research, repository-wide inventories of existing and planned mathematics, scope, coverage, milestones, and roadmap articles; do not create repository infrastructure or prove Lean declarations.
Also in 4 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkillbuild
Build the TypeSpec Rust emitter from source. Run this after cloning the repo, after pulling changes, or when TypeScript source files have been modified.
Also in 8 projects that use this
In this repository46 other files it gives its agents.
- .claude/skills/react-best-practices/AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- ai-multimodalSkill
- askSkill
- backend-developmentSkill
- brainstorm-featuresSkill
- brainstorm-technicalSkill
- chrome-devtoolsSkill
- code-reviewSkill
- context-engineeringSkill
- cookSkill
- databasesSkill
- debugSkill
- design-mockup-createSkill
- design-systemSkill
- devopsSkill
- docs-seekerSkill
- docsSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- frontend-developmentSkill
- gitSkill
- journalSkill
- markdown-novel-viewerSkill
- mermaidjs-v11Skill
- mobile-developmentSkill
- plans-kanbanSkill
- planSkill
- previewSkill
- problem-solvingSkill
- project-managementSkill
- quality-gatesSkill
- react-best-practicesSkill
- repomixSkill
- researchSkill
- scoutSkill
- sequential-thinkingSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- specsSkill
- teamSkill
- test-casesSkill
- testSkill
- ui-stylingSkill
- ui-ux-pro-maxSkill
- web-design-guidelinesSkill
- web-frameworksSkill
- web-testingSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

