agentleFS
tylergibbs1tylergibbs1/codewarden/skills/vercel-design-guidelines/SKILL.md

vercel-design-guidelines

Skill1 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub

Check web interfaces against Vercel's design guidelines. Use when asked to "review my UI", "check accessibility", "audit design", "review UX", "check my site against best practices", or "apply Vercel design guidelines".

1 other project uses a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

  • Other versions1 project uses a version of this.

    Word for word · 1

    1. adriancooney/claude-code-configurator★ 1100% same

    Edited · 0

    None found.

    Wrote their own version · 0

    None found.

    How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.

  • In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 5 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈5

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read the user's code (components, CSS, HTML)

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Check against Vercel design guidelines (interactions, animations, layout, content, forms, performance, design, copywriting)

    line 13
  3. Distinctive:

    When a user asks to review their UI or check against design guidelines:

    line 19
  4. Distinctive:

    Read the relevant source files (components, styles, HTML)

    line 22
  5. Distinctive:

    Always fetch fresh guidelines to ensure you're checking against the latest standards.

    line 28

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Vercel Design Guidelines

Review web interfaces against Vercel's comprehensive design guidelines and propose fixes.

How It Works

  1. Read the user's code (components, CSS, HTML)
  2. Check against Vercel design guidelines (interactions, animations, layout, content, forms, performance, design, copywriting)
  3. Report violations with specific line references
  4. Propose concrete fixes with code examples

Usage

When a user asks to review their UI or check against design guidelines:

  1. Fetch the live guidelines from https://vercel.com/design/guidelines
  2. Read the relevant source files (components, styles, HTML)
  3. Analyze the code against each applicable guideline category
  4. Report findings grouped by category with severity

Guidelines URL: https://vercel.com/design/guidelines

Always fetch fresh guidelines to ensure you're checking against the latest standards.

Audit Categories

  • Interactions: Keyboard accessibility, focus management, hit targets, loading states, URL persistence
  • Animations: Reduced motion, GPU acceleration, easing, interruptibility
  • Layout: Optical adjustment, alignment, responsive testing, safe areas
  • Content: Inline help, skeletons, empty states, typography, accessibility
  • Forms: Labels, validation, autocomplete, error handling, submit behavior
  • Performance: Re-renders, layout thrashing, virtualization, preloading
  • Design: Shadows, borders, radii, contrast, color accessibility
  • Copywriting: Active voice, title case, clarity, error messaging

Output Format

Present findings as:

## {Category} Issues

### {Severity}: {Guideline Name}
**File:** `path/to/file.tsx:42`
**Issue:** {Description of the violation}
**Guideline:** {Brief guideline reference}
**Fix:**
```{language}
{Proposed code fix}

Severity levels:
- **Critical**: Accessibility violations, broken functionality
- **Warning**: UX issues, performance concerns
- **Suggestion**: Polish, best practices

## Example Review

Interactions Issues

Critical: Keyboard Accessibility

File: components/Modal.tsx:28 Issue: Modal lacks focus trap - keyboard users can tab outside Guideline: Implement focus traps per WAI-ARIA patterns Fix:

// Add focus trap using @radix-ui/react-focus-guards or similar
import { FocusScope } from '@radix-ui/react-focus-scope';

<FocusScope trapped>
  <ModalContent>{children}</ModalContent>
</FocusScope>

Warning: Loading State Duration

File: components/Button.tsx:15 Issue: No minimum loading duration - causes flicker on fast responses Guideline: Add 150-300ms delay and 300-500ms minimum visibility Fix:

const [isLoading, setIsLoading] = useState(false);
const minimumLoadingTime = 300;

async function handleClick() {
  setIsLoading(true);
  const start = Date.now();
  await action();
  const elapsed = Date.now() - start;
  if (elapsed < minimumLoadingTime) {
    await new Promise(r => setTimeout(r, minimumLoadingTime - elapsed));
  }
  setIsLoading(false);
}

## Quick Checklist

For rapid reviews, check these high-impact items first:

- [ ] All interactive elements keyboard accessible
- [ ] Visible focus rings on focusable elements
- [ ] Hit targets ≥24px (44px on mobile)
- [ ] Form inputs have associated labels
- [ ] Loading states don't flicker
- [ ] `prefers-reduced-motion` respected
- [ ] No `transition: all`
- [ ] Errors show how to fix, not just what's wrong
- [ ] Color contrast meets APCA standards
- [ ] No zoom disabled

## Present Results to User

After reviewing:

Design Guidelines Audit

Reviewed {N} files against Vercel design guidelines.

Summary

  • Critical: {N} issues
  • Warning: {N} issues
  • Suggestions: {N} items

{Detailed findings by category}

Recommended Priority

  1. {First critical fix}
  2. {Second critical fix} ...

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.