auto-test
Skill0 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Runs an autonomous test generation loop that finds uncovered code paths, writes tests for them, runs the suite, and keeps tests that pass and increase coverage. Loops indefinitely. Triggers on "auto-test", "generate tests", "increase coverage", "write tests for my codebase", "test generation loop", or "cover untested code".
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- ulpi-io/autonomous-engineeringtheir own version, first seen Jul 19, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- ulpi-io/autonomous-engineering★ 2same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- auto-refactoringSkill
- auto-researchingSkill
- fuzz-fixingSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
7 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 21
No snapshot spam. No tautological assertions.
- Very specific: line 25
If testgen.json exists, skip to Setup Phase.
- Distinctive: line 33
Agent 2 — Coverage Baseline: Run existing tests with coverage.
- Very specific: line 57
Create branch autotest/<tag> (append -2, -3 if exists)
- Distinctive: line 58
Verify existing tests pass and record baseline coverage
- Very specific: line 59
Add results.tsv and run.log to .gitignore
- Distinctive: line 126
If it uses fixtures, use fixtures.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Auto-Test
Autonomous test generation loop: find uncovered code, write a test, run the suite, keep tests that pass and increase coverage, discard tests that fail or don't help.
Contract: every new test passes the full suite and increases coverage. No snapshot spam. No tautological assertions.
Discovery Flow
If testgen.json exists, skip to Setup Phase.
Explore with 2 parallel subagents:
Agent 1 — Structure & Stack: Directory tree, language/framework, build system, project purpose. Identify the test framework (Jest, Vitest, pytest, Go test, etc.) and how tests are organized.
Agent 2 — Coverage Baseline: Run existing tests with coverage. Report total line/branch coverage, identify the least-covered files, and note any files with zero coverage. Find the coverage command and output format.
Present findings and ask one question:
Here's what I found:
- [project summary]
- [test framework and organization]
- [current coverage: X% lines, Y% branches]
- [least-covered files]
What should I focus on?
- Whole codebase (start with least-covered files)
- Specific directories or files
- Specific modules or layers (e.g., "API handlers", "utils")
Infer config from exploration — see CONFIG.md for fields.
- Write
testgen.json, show for confirmation, then proceed.
Setup Phase
- Parse
testgen.json - Create branch
autotest/<tag>(append-2,-3if exists) - Verify existing tests pass and record baseline coverage
- Add
results.tsvandrun.logto.gitignore - Initialize
results.tsvwith header row - Build ranked list of uncovered files/functions from coverage report
- This is the last interaction. From here, fully autonomous.
The Loop
LOOP FOREVER. NEVER stop. NEVER ask permission to continue.
1. PICK: Choose the target with lowest coverage from the ranked list.
Cooldown targets where last 3 test attempts were discarded.
Review results.tsv for trends.
2. ANALYZE: Read the source file. Understand what the code does,
its inputs, outputs, side effects, and error paths. Read existing
tests for the module to understand conventions and test patterns.
3. WRITE TEST: Write one focused test file (or add to existing test file).
Follow project conventions for:
- File naming (*.test.ts, test_*.py, *_test.go, etc.)
- Import style
- Test structure (describe/it, test functions, etc.)
- Setup/teardown patterns
- Mocking patterns already in use
Target ONE code path per test. Prefer:
- Happy path first (if untested)
- Error/edge cases second
- Branch coverage over line coverage
4. RUN: Execute test suite > run.log 2>&1.
- New test fails → delete test file, log as "test_failed", move on.
- Existing tests break → delete test file, log as "broke_existing", move on.
- All pass → proceed to measure.
5. MEASURE: Run coverage command > run.log 2>&1.
Extract coverage metric.
- Coverage increased → keep.
- Coverage unchanged → discard (test is redundant).
- Coverage decreased (shouldn't happen if tests pass) → discard.
6. COMMIT (if kept): Add test file only. Descriptive message with
what's being tested and coverage delta.
Do NOT commit results.tsv or run.log.
7. LOG: Append to results.tsv (iteration, timestamp, target_file,
test_file, code_path_tested, coverage_before, coverage_after,
status, reason).
8. UPDATE RANKING: Re-extract per-file coverage, re-rank targets.
9. Every 10 iterations, print progress summary. GOTO 1.Test Quality Rules
- One behavior per test — each test verifies one code path or one edge case.
- Descriptive names — test name should read as a specification:
"returns empty array when input is null"not"test1". - Real assertions — assert specific values, not just "doesn't throw".
expect(result).toEqual([1, 2, 3])notexpect(result).toBeDefined(). - No snapshot abuse — snapshots are for rendering output, not logic testing.
- Minimal mocking — mock external dependencies (network, filesystem, time), not internal modules. Follow the project's existing mock patterns.
- No test interdependence — each test must pass in isolation.
- Match project style — if the project uses factories, use factories. If it uses fixtures, use fixtures. Don't introduce new patterns.
What NOT to Test
- Private internals — test through the public interface.
- Framework code — don't test that Express routes or React renders.
- Type system guarantees — if TypeScript prevents it, don't test for it.
- Configuration — don't test that env vars are read correctly.
- Trivial getters/setters — no value in testing
getName() { return this.name }.
Critical Rules
- Protect context window — see CONTEXT.md. Always redirect output.
- results.tsv is your memory — survives git resets, full history.
- One test per iteration — isolate variables. If a test fails, you know which one.
- Never modify source code — you're writing tests, not fixing bugs. If you find a bug, log it in results.tsv as "bug_found" and move on.
- Follow existing conventions — read existing tests before writing new ones.
- When stuck — see STRATEGIES.md.
Output
- Git history on
autotest/<tag>— each test is a commit with coverage delta - results.tsv — full test generation log
- run.log — most recent test/coverage output
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

