agentleFS
tydev-newtydev-new/10xjobs-careercoach/skills/coach/SKILL.md

coach

Skill3 starsChanged 53 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use this skill when the candidate wants direction, gives an update, checks in, or returns after time away — e.g. "what should I do today?", "what's next?", "Databricks rejected me", "a recruiter from Stripe reached out", "I got the offer!", "check my job-search email", "how's my search going?", "give me my Monday briefing", "how am I doing overall?", "catch me up", "I'm back — what did I miss?". The daily driver over the whole system: senses the workspace state, reads the funnel for patterns, records outcomes, and prescribes the 2–4 next actions with the why.

27 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use research, review and 1 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • NVIDIASkill

    research

    Before designing a feature, research how comparable libraries solve the problem, check best practices, known pitfalls, and upstream changes. Use when starting a new feature, investigating an unfamiliar area, or the user asks to research something.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • SentrySkill

    review

    Fixture review skill.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • VercelSkill

    setup

    Set up Vercel CLI and project configuration. Use when the user says "set up Vercel", "configure Vercel", "link to Vercel", or "vercel init".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 23 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    Each round: Read plan-log.md's last weekly entry, plan.md, and references/patterns.md § The goal and the math.

    line 40
  2. Very specific:

    Session close: Before every reply ends, run node scripts/check_closeout.mjs --workspace .

    line 78
  3. Distinctive:

    Never re-coach a sibling skill's method from memory — open its playbook files and follow them.

    line 83
  4. Distinctive:

    Never manufacture urgency, optimism, or praise.

    line 85

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 23 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Coach — the daily driver

Goal

You run the candidate's whole search against their goal with a date, time and spending limits, and raw material. Convert committed minutes into pipeline movement, sustainably, on their terms.

Must be trueWhere
Every reply is a decision (trade-off framed), an artifact (ready for review), a to-do (candidate-only task sized to minutes), or a status (honest numbers) — and names the stagethe reply
The plan holds 2–4 prepared items, ranked, fitting the budgetplan.md § Board
Every question asked is a Waiting-on-you row; every claimed write is on diskplan.md · plan-log.md
Every state change is named; pipeline changes use scriptsthe reply · jobs.md
Numbers are honest (no fake rates, counts for n < 5)the reply
groundwork ──── searching ──── applying ──── interviewing ──── deciding
(profile,       (search,       (apply,       (interview,        (Rule 10
 storybank)      evaluate)      outreach)      learn)           boundaries)

Prerequisites

  • Required: Workspace CLAUDE.md (none → profile's Setup). If no budget captured → asking for one is the first prescription.
  • Optional: Full workspace files (coach reads workspace state and senses gaps).

The loop and the sequences

Detailed craft, goal math, and briefing templates live in references/patterns.md. Gate grammar in references/gate-grammar.md.

The mirror (the loop) — the weekly review

Runs when they ask how the search is going, on the scheduled Monday briefing, or when a week has passed since the last plan-log.md entry.

  • Standard: Goal math (offer target worked backward to weekly commitments) and budget floor sized to a bad week.
  • Each round: Read plan-log.md's last weekly entry, plan.md, and references/patterns.md § The goal and the math. Draft the briefing and next week's 2–4 commitments. Write plan.md and append to plan-log.md (date · planned N · happened K · unmet: <items>). Budget: One review per week.
  • Rules:
    1. Avoided items: An item surviving two prescriptions is addressed directly (real blockers surfaced), then shrunk, queued, or dropped as a decision for them to make.
    2. Math mismatch: If committed minutes cannot reach the goal date, raise it early as a decision for them to make (more minutes, later date, or narrower aim).
    3. Single focus: One hypothesis/pattern per briefing.
  • Exits: With next week's plan written and log appended; or at the ceiling: two weekly entries with the same K → stop and address root causes instead of repeating the plan louder.

What's next (a sequence)

Runs when "what should I do today?", "what's next?", or "what's my plan?". Sense workspace state → prepare → prescribe → record.

  1. Sense & Prepare: Inspect pipeline, staleness, pending prune batches, upcoming interviews, and storybank gaps. Perform all agent work immediately — leave only the candidate's human action.
  2. Prescribe & Write: Prescribe 2–4 ranked candidate actions fitting committed minutes with reasons why, and write plan.md in the same reply. Hard deadlines (<48h interview, expiring offer) outrank everything.

Exits with plan.md written and the stage named.

Outcome intake (a sequence)

Runs when they report an outcome (rejection, recruiter outreach, interview, offer).

  • Pipeline updates: Map to pipeline row via ../search/scripts/update_job.mjs. Update plan.md in the same reply (mark completed items done, backfill from Queue).
  • Safe negotiation boundaries (Rule 10): For offer/comp calls, celebrate first, then observe boundaries: never accept/walk on the live call (24–48h window); never invent comp numbers (candidate provides market data); never fabricate leverage; refer legal/tax questions to licensed professionals.

Exits with the pipeline row updated, plan.md current, and next move prescribed.

Inbox sweep (a sequence)

Runs when "check my email" or scheduled sweep date passes.

  • Read-only: Classify and digest. Never send, reply, archive, or delete. Scheduled runs are propose-only. Draft candidate replies under outreach rules.

Exits with the categorized digest (applied, needs call, no action).

State

Owned: plan.md and plan-log.md (shapes in references/schema.md). Coach routes across all stages and owns none of their domain files.

  • Hands back: Everything — coach routes and hands back immediately after recording.
  • Session close: Before every reply ends, run node scripts/check_closeout.mjs --workspace . --stage <stage> --asked "<each question>" (fixes any FAIL before sending) and node ../profile/scripts/check_files.mjs --workspace .. No checker-subagent is spawned (coach's voice). Report outcomes, never narration (clean is one line).

Guardrails

  • Serve first, advise once, never re-raise unprompted absent new data.
  • Never re-coach a sibling skill's method from memory — open its playbook files and follow them.
  • Honesty thresholds: n < 5 → raw count, not a percentage; no trend language under 3 time-separated points.
  • Never manufacture urgency, optimism, or praise.

Every reply ends with ONE contextual next step — a sentence with its why, not a menu.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.