agentleFS
ttalkkaklabttalkkaklab/social-flow/skills/platform-guide/SKILL.md

platform-guide

Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

The per-platform writing rules, video specs and safe zones. Knowledge only, nothing runs. Use when the user asks about "플랫폼 문법", "플랫폼별 작성 규칙", "인스타 캡션 어떻게", "쇼츠 제목 규칙", "platform grammar", "how to write for Threads/Instagram/Facebook/YouTube", or when another social-flow skill needs the posting limits, caption rules, video specs or safe-zone numbers. The source of truth is references/platform-playbook.md.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read it before writing for any platform, without exception.

    line 60
  2. Distinctive:

    After writing or editing any Korean copy, run the checker for its surface.

    line 64
  3. Distinctive:

    Read outgoing copy for factual support, natural language and fit with the channel and conversation.

    line 98

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Automatic execution policy: Read automation guidance first. Creative rules and review findings guide improvements; scores, review/hash/freeze records, CTA choices and intermediate approval steps do not block authorized work. Preserve actual external-action authorization and stop at the artifact the user requested. This policy supersedes older quality-gate wording below.

Platform guide — the SoT for grammar and specs

A knowledge-only skill holding the writing grammar, video specs, limits, and anti-patterns for the four publishing platforms: Threads · Instagram · Facebook · YouTube. produce (§9 per-platform text), publish (approval-gate review), and the content-reviewer agent all take this skill's playbook as their baseline.

Core principles (summary)

  1. "Share the facts, never the sentences" — even with the same material, redesign the speaker, register, sentence endings, and information density for each platform. Automatic cross-posting is banned.
  2. Plain language — use the channel audience's knowledge and voice; default to adult non-specialists. No unexplained jargon, no translationese, no over-compressed sentences with the subject dropped. If a necessary term is unfamiliar to that audience, lead with the plain word and gloss the term in parentheses on first appearance only.
  3. The first encounter is everything — the first line on Threads, the first 125 characters of an IG caption, the YT title+thumbnail, the first second and then the first 3 seconds of the video. If you don't win there, the rest never gets read. The first second is a measurement, not a feeling: after the build, the first subtitle cue's start time is read off the shipped SRT, and past 1.0s it warns (playbook §7).
  4. Golden-hour replies — answer comments in the first 60 minutes after publishing; the same reactions spread further when they land early (grow-threads references/growth-playbook.md §Principles). The one sourced lift figure is Buffer's 10.2M-post Threads set: posts where the author replied to their own post took +42% engagement, the largest of the six platforms it tracks.
  5. Korean without AI tells — one sentence of translationese, stock phrasing, or assistant-speak makes the whole post read as an ad and get scrolled past. The rules live in references/korean-style.md; the findings come from references/check-style.py. Narration, subtitles, copy, titles, and comment drafts are all in scope.

Platforms at a glance

ThreadsInstagramFacebookYouTube
Formtext · 1 image · video on the post (videoUrl)reels · carousel ≤10 imagestext/image/regular videoShorts (9:16 ≤3 min)
Body limit500 charscaption 2,200 chars5,000 charstitle 100 · description 5,000
Registercasual spoken, short by default (§3)hook in the first 125 chars; a save prompt is optionalstructured expositoryone spoken sentence, result withheld
Linksnone in the body — the video rides on the post; a self-reply link only as the fallback (§3)caption links not clickable → commentbanned in body → first commentdescription OK
Hashtags≤1 (ranking weight 0)no fixed count — topic markers in the caption0–2#Shorts required by preset; 3–5 is guidance
Mediavideo/image as public HTTPS URLpublic HTTPS URLpublic HTTPS URLlocal file upload
Limits250 posts/24h100 posts/24h—100 uploads/day

Detailed grammar, copy formulas, the anti-pattern checklist, and video specs (safe zones, subtitles, length) are in references/platform-playbook.md — Read it before writing for any platform, without exception.

Style check

After writing or editing any Korean copy, run the checker for its surface. The code lists the findings; a human or agent reads them and fixes the sentences.

PG=${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/platform-guide/references
python3 $PG/check-style.py --surface <surface> <file>
node $PG/extract-text.js ./storyboard/scenes.js <narration|subtitle|screen> | \
  python3 $PG/check-style.py --surface <surface> -

8 surfaces: narration subtitle screen threads ig fb yt reply. exit 0 pass / 1 warning (S2 accumulation) / 2 S1 found / 3 the check did not run (empty input · path error) / 4 skip (the text is not Korean, so the rules have nothing to say about it).

S1 findings are suggestions. Fix the sentence and re-run, or write down why it stays; neither the exit code nor a score decides whether authorized work goes on (owner directive 2026-10-16). exit 3 is not a pass — fix the path and run again. exit 4 is not_applicable, not a pass and not a failure. Write paths against ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT} (produce·publish run from data/<channel>/episodes/<topic>/, so relative paths won't resolve).

The YouTube meta file gets a second, structural check on top of the style one — node $PG/check-meta.js output/youtube/meta.md reads the playbook §6 layout, the title limits, the preset hashtags, the summary voice, and a verbatim copy of COMPREHENSION.answer (it finds scenes.js from the episode layout). Same exit codes. Its 0 is "layout and verbatim leak clean" — a paraphrased result is the reviewer's blind read. A short whose cover opens on the result (hookType:"spoiler") keeps this check: the cover may say the answer, the title and the description still withhold it (playbook §2). Only long-form answer-first episodes skip it.

Editorial review guidance for outgoing copy

Read outgoing copy for factual support, natural language and fit with the channel and conversation. A style checker or independent reviewer can help when a concrete issue needs another look. Findings and scores inform revisions; no threshold, review count or intermediate approval blocks already-authorized work. Record missing reviews honestly. Publication and replies still require actual user or standing authorization for that external action.

Outgoing copyAuthored byReviewerVerdict tail
Storyboard narration (the spoken sentences alone)storyboard · autoproducestoryboard-reviewer narration mode, then vocabulary mode — optional reads with the actual actions and attributed speechSTORYBOARD_REVIEW
Platform copy (threads · ig · fb · yt)produce · autoproducecontent-reviewer copy axisCONTENT_REVIEW
Growth copy (new posts · search-driven engagement · inbox replies)grow-threads · grow-instagram · grow-youtubegrowth-post-reviewerGROWTH_POST_REVIEW
Post-publish repliespublishgrowth-post-reviewerGROWTH_POST_REVIEW
bio · channel description · taglinechannel · introgrowth-post-reviewer standaloneGROWTH_POST_REVIEW

Additional Resources

Reference Files

  • references/platform-playbook.md — per-platform grammar in detail, copy formulas, video specs, anti-pattern checklist (SoT)
  • references/korean-style.md — Korean style SoT: AI-tell pattern tables (T·D·C·A·E), severities, per-surface application, the prefer-deletion principle
  • references/check-style.py — deterministic style checker (stdlib only; --surface · --json · --doc · --selftest); findings are suggestions, exit codes report severity
  • references/check-meta.js — the YouTube meta.md check: the §6 layout, title limits (100 chars · no <> · front-loading warning), the format preset's required hashtags, the summary voice, and a verbatim COMPREHENSION.answer in the title or description (--print title|description|tags · --selftest)
  • references/pipeline.js — the step catalog: the stage ladder, the checks and reviews on the attended and unattended paths with what each one decides (only operational contracts stop work; reviews file findings), the reviewer verdict-tail contract, and produce's three build lanes. episode-state.js derives an episode's stage from it; docs/pipeline-manifest.md explains the design
  • references/pipeline-lint.js — checks the workflow entrypoints and reviewer table against pipeline.js (7 rules, read-only; --list · --selftest)
  • references/extract-text.js — scenes.js → per-surface text extraction (narration · subtitle · screen; handles the window.SCENES global contract)
  • references/safezone-landscape.md — the 16:9 safe-zone measurements (2026-08-17): x 96/1920 · top 96/1080 · bottom 285/1080, and which surfaces stay provisional. formats.js, the video template and the storyboard template all cite it
  • references/reply-gate.md — reply context and optional editing diagnostics, with actual sending authorization kept separate
  • references/formats.js / references/format-resolve.js / references/format-lint.js — the format presets, the resolver the builders call, and the linter that holds the inline mirrors to them
  • references/skill-lint.js — the skill-surface check: routing descriptions, tool lanes, reference links and orphans, manifest parity, the tool count in prose (16 rules; --list · --selftest)

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.