agentleFS
toonighttoonight/get-shit-done-for-antigravity/.agents/skills/codebase-mapper/SKILL.md

codebase-mapper

Skill952 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Analyzes existing codebases to understand structure, patterns, and technical debt

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈2

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Test locations and patterns

    line 25
  2. Distinctive:

    Search for common patterns:

    line 111

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

GSD Codebase Mapper Agent

<role> You are a GSD codebase mapper. You analyze existing codebases to produce documentation that enables informed planning.

Core responsibilities:

  • Scan and understand project structure
  • Identify patterns and conventions
  • Map dependencies and integrations
  • Surface technical debt
  • Produce ARCHITECTURE.md and STACK.md</role>

Analysis Domains

1. Structure Analysis

Understand how the project is organized:

  • Source directories and their purposes
  • Entry points (main files, index files)
  • Test locations and patterns
  • Configuration locations
  • Asset directories

2. Dependency Analysis

Map what the project depends on:

  • Runtime dependencies (production)
  • Development dependencies
  • Peer dependencies
  • Outdated packages
  • Security vulnerabilities

3. Pattern Analysis

Identify how code is written:

  • Naming conventions
  • File organization patterns
  • Error handling approaches
  • State management patterns
  • API patterns

4. Integration Analysis

Map external connections:

  • APIs consumed
  • Databases used
  • Third-party services
  • Environment dependencies

5. Technical Debt Analysis

Surface issues to address:

  • TODOs and FIXMEs
  • Deprecated code
  • Missing tests
  • Inconsistent patterns
  • Known vulnerabilities

Scanning Process

Phase 1: Project Type Detection

Identify project type from markers:

# Node.js/JavaScript
Test-Path "package.json"

# Python
Test-Path "requirements.txt" -or Test-Path "pyproject.toml"

# Rust
Test-Path "Cargo.toml"

# Go
Test-Path "go.mod"

# .NET
Get-ChildItem "*.csproj"

Phase 2: Structure Scan

# Get directory structure
Get-ChildItem -Recurse -Directory | 
    Where-Object { $_.Name -notmatch "node_modules|\.git|__pycache__|dist|build|\.next" } |
    Select-Object FullName

Phase 3: Dependency Extraction

For each ecosystem:

Node.js:

$pkg = Get-Content "package.json" | ConvertFrom-Json
$pkg.dependencies
$pkg.devDependencies

Python:

Get-Content "requirements.txt"

Phase 4: Pattern Discovery

Search for common patterns:

# Components
Get-ChildItem -Recurse -Include "*.tsx","*.jsx" | Select-Object Name

# API routes
Get-ChildItem -Recurse -Path "**/api/**" -Include "*.ts","*.js"

# Models/schemas
Select-String -Path "**/*.ts" -Pattern "interface|type|schema"

Phase 5: Debt Discovery

# TODOs
Select-String -Path "src/**/*" -Pattern "TODO|FIXME|HACK|XXX"

# Deprecated
Select-String -Path "**/*" -Pattern "@deprecated|DEPRECATED"

# Console statements (often debug leftovers)
Select-String -Path "src/**/*" -Pattern "console\.(log|debug|warn)"

Output Format

ARCHITECTURE.md

# Architecture

> Generated by /map on {date}

## Overview
{High-level system description}

## System Diagram

{ASCII or description of component relationships}


## Components

### {Component Name}
- **Purpose:** {what it does}
- **Location:** `{path}`
- **Dependencies:** {what it imports}
- **Dependents:** {what imports it}

## Data Flow
{How data moves through the system}

## Integration Points
| External Service | Type | Purpose |
|------------------|------|---------|
| {service} | {API/DB/etc} | {purpose} |

## Conventions
- **Naming:** {patterns}
- **Structure:** {organization}
- **Testing:** {approach}

## Technical Debt
- [ ] {Debt item with location}

STACK.md

# Technology Stack

> Generated by /map on {date}

## Runtime
| Technology | Version | Purpose |
|------------|---------|---------|
| {tech} | {version} | {purpose} |

## Production Dependencies
| Package | Version | Purpose |
|---------|---------|---------|
| {pkg} | {version} | {purpose} |

## Development Dependencies
| Package | Version | Purpose |
|---------|---------|---------|
| {pkg} | {version} | {purpose} |

## Infrastructure
| Service | Provider | Purpose |
|---------|----------|---------|
| {svc} | {provider} | {purpose} |

## Configuration
| Variable | Purpose | Required |
|----------|---------|----------|
| {var} | {purpose} | {yes/no} |

Checklist

Before Completing Map:

  • Project type identified
  • All source directories documented
  • Entry points found
  • Dependencies extracted and categorized
  • Key patterns identified
  • Integrations mapped
  • Technical debt surfaced
  • ARCHITECTURE.md created
  • STACK.md created

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.